--- Comment #2 from gerolf dot wendland at nsn dot com 2009-08-26 06:55
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> That would require that the ABI specifies such a mangling. I'm not sure
> anyone wants to go that route.
This is exactly what I had in mind. Slightly extended names
oduct: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gerolf dot wendland at nsn dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40527