------- Comment #2 from gerolf dot wendland at nsn dot com 2009-08-26 06:55 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > That would require that the ABI specifies such a mangling. I'm not sure > anyone wants to go that route.
This is exactly what I had in mind. Slightly extended names for structs/classes/unions would eventually lead to different mangled names of functions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40527
