https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115902
--- Comment #3 from David Mazières ---
This might be the same as Bug 115583.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115902
Bug ID: 115902
Summary: Can't call immediate function within "if consteval"
when optimizing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101113
David Mazières changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112715
--- Comment #1 from David Mazières ---
I should have mentioned, I hereby place the test case in the public domain.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112715
Bug ID: 112715
Summary: Incorrect handling of template type aliases
instantiated from decltype of lambdas
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107889
Bug ID: 107889
Summary: Incorrect parsing of qualified friend function
returning decltype(auto)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101113
--- Comment #3 from David Mazieres ---
(In reply to TC from comment #2)
> https://eel.is/c++draft/class.copy.ctor#5
>
> I don't think this code is valid. The constraint (which isn't checked until
> overload resolution time anyway) can't suppres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101113
Bug ID: 101113
Summary: g++ thinks constructor suppressed by a requires clause
is actually a bad copy constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100946
Bug ID: 100946
Summary: [concepts] nonsensical results of compound
requirements in requires expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
