[Bug c++/101113] g++ thinks constructor suppressed by a requires clause is actually a bad copy constructor

[gcc at nospam dot scs.stanford.edu via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101113

David Mazières <gcc at nospam dot scs.stanford.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #4 from David Mazières <gcc at nospam dot scs.stanford.edu> ---
Sorry I should have closed this bug report a while ago when I said it wasn't a
bug.