[Bug lto/84995] Document gcc-ar and gcc-ranlib vs {libdir}/bfd-plugins (or actually start to install liblto_plugin under $LIBDIR/bfd-plugins)

2025-03-04 Thread eschwartz93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995 --- Comment #21 from Eli Schwartz --- I think that it makes sense to install this, for the same reason that one would wish to install the "gcc" symlink. If the user only has a single supported GCC version, this is a benefit. If the user has multi

[Bug objc/117478] -ObjC is not accepted: error: argument to '-O' should be a non-negative integer, 'g', 's', 'z' or 'fast'

2024-11-07 Thread eschwartz93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117478 --- Comment #5 from Eli Schwartz --- https://github.com/GNOME/gegl/blob/626c202550c4536c2e411821fb34e91d138c1548/meson.build#L246-L254 ``` if os_osx add_languages('objc') osx_ldflags = ['-Wl,-framework,Foundation', '-Wl,-framework,AppKit',

[Bug objc/117478] -ObjC is not accepted: error: argument to '-O' should be a non-negative integer, 'g', 's', 'z' or 'fast'

2024-11-07 Thread eschwartz93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117478 --- Comment #12 from Eli Schwartz --- (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #11) > Do you mean that even with the correct flag passed, the code won’t compile > with gcc14? While I have gcc15 locally (not updating it weekly though), few > peop

[Bug objc/117478] -ObjC is not accepted: error: argument to '-O' should be a non-negative integer, 'g', 's', 'z' or 'fast'

2024-11-07 Thread eschwartz93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117478 --- Comment #9 from Eli Schwartz --- It's not a bad idea to "fix" it from both ends. Projects such as gegl cannot compile on macOS using GCC 13 or 14, and that's not going to change. They can't really know what versions their users have install

[Bug c/105863] RFE: C23 #embed

2024-11-06 Thread eschwartz93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105863 Eli Schwartz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eschwartz93 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug lto/114505] static archives built with gcc --without-zstd cause ICE when read by gcc with zstd support

2024-03-27 Thread eschwartz93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114505 --- Comment #12 from Eli Schwartz --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1) > Confirmed as I've seen it before. At least we should turn it into a > "normal" error message instead of ICE. > > But note that even "downgrading the compression al

[Bug lto/114505] New: static archives built with gcc --without-zstd cause ICE when read by gcc with zstd support

2024-03-27 Thread eschwartz93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114505 Bug ID: 114505 Summary: static archives built with gcc --without-zstd cause ICE when read by gcc with zstd support Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED