--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-05-05 18:09
---
Will someone with the requisite permissions please set this bug to NEW? This has
been confirmed.
Thanks
Eric
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19636
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-05-05 17:25
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Bootstrapping avr-rtems w/ f95 enabled trips a similar or may-be the same bug
> (also a target which probably doesn't provide REAL 8).
As a side note, it is known that Fortr
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21284
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21107
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-04-19 15:49
---
Björn,
That sounds like a reasonable approach. Submit a bug report to the avr-libc
project on Savannah:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/avr-libc/>
Eric
--
What|R
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21078
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21018
ReportedBy: ericw at evcohs dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21052
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-04-13 15:43
---
FYI, I've tested the patch on my system here and it works for me.
Eric
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20822
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20937
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20808
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-04-08 11:48
---
I got this same error as Rolf did, building an AVR cross GCC with Ada on MinGW.
Could someone with more permissions be willing to set the Status as NEW?
Eric Weddington
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20594
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-04-07 16:50
---
Created an attachment (id=8556)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8556&action=view)
Patch from MinGW project that fixes the problem on Win2k,XP
This patch is from the MinGW project, at t
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-04-07 16:47
---
According to this related thread:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-03/msg01079.html>
There is a patch on the MinGW project here:
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=1053
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675
ot org
ReportedBy: ericw at evcohs dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20594
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20530
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||19885
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||19885
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17993
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||19885
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19087
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-10 21:30
---
Marek, can you review this bug, the attached patches, and possibly approve
committing the fix?
Thanks
Eric
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20355
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20296
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-04 18:24
---
Could this problem be because it needs the --with-dwarf2 configure switch (for
the __EH_FRAME_BEGIN__)?
Reference: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-07/msg00352.html>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-04 14:19
---
(In reply to comment #11)
Paul,
Everybody who works on the AVR toolchain knows that it would be desirable to
have attributes to allow objects to be put in and accessed in different address
spaces. This has
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-04 00:38
---
Could you attach your proposed patch insted of putting it inline in the comment?
Thanks
Eric
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20227
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-03 19:49
---
Subject: Re: AVR assignment of a value through a 16 bit
pointer generates out of order code
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-03 19
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-02 22:01
---
Link to discussion on avr-gcc-list:
<http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/avr-gcc-list/2005-02/msg00220.html>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20288
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-02 18:20
---
And the Component should be marked "target".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20288
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-03-02 18:19
---
Please note that this was discussed heavily on avr-gcc-list recently, and it is
a desired feature to have. This should be marked as an enhancement (since I
don't have sufficient permissions).
--
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-28 23:42
---
What is the status of this bug wrt. to the 4.0 branch? Is it fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14316
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-28 22:10
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly
determines required built-in function size requirements.
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-28 22:03
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Can't compile gnattools
for the cross targets
laurent at guerby dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-02-28 21:54
>
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-28 22:01
---
Subject: Re: static initialization .data redundantly copied
to ram prior to use.
bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
>2005
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20243
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-24 16:21
---
Subject: Re: 4.0 bootstrap unreasonably requires 64-bit
target type mode support.
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-24 16
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-24 14:31
---
Subject: Re: 4.0 bootstrap unreasonably requires 64-bit
target type mode support.
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-24 14
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-24 14:04
---
Subject: Re: 4.0 bootstrap unreasonably requires 64-bit
target type mode support.
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-24 02
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-23 23:32
---
Please explain why you think it is a bug for the avr to support long long. Your
description sounds like an opinion.
The pointer size on the AVR is currently 16 bits. This will change in the near
future to either
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-22 13:19
---
Subject: Re: unable to find a register to spill in class
`POINTER_REGS'
dieterbmeier at yahoo dot com wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From dieterbmeier at yahoo dot com 2005-02-22
>10:32
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20016
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19959
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-11 19:38
---
Bernd, does this still fail on the most recent HEAD?
Eric
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10768
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern dot m dot haase at
||web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern dot m dot haase at
||web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern dot m dot haase at
||web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-10 23:36
---
As an aside, DWARF2 is about to become the default debugging information used in
WinAVR, for both Atmel's AVR Studio and for use with avr-gdb/avr-insight. So
this one is crucial for having a successful
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-10 21:48
---
Subject: Re: Can't compile ethernut OS (avr-gcc)
dieterbmeier at yahoo dot com wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From dieterbmeier at yahoo dot com 2005-02-10
>21:44 ---
>It still fai
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-10 19:43
---
Dieter, could you please try this out with a more recent snapshot?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19636
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-10 18:59
---
The testcase compiles successfully with avr-gcc on 3.3.2, and 3.4.3, using
-mmcu=atmega128.
Could someone with sufficient permissions please set the "Known To Work" field.
Dieter, could you confirm wh
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19815
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19684
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19293
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-12-20 17:44
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hmm, on the mainline I get an error about dwarf2 not being supported:
> t.c:1: error: target system does not support the "dwarf-2" debug format
>
If you're talk
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-12-14 14:18
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees
not being computed.
On 14 Dec 2004 at 12:33, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From sch
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-12-14 05:03
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees
not being computed.
On 14 Dec 2004 at 2:13, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From sch
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-12-06 21:45
---
Subject: Re: -save-temps option ends with corrupt object
file
dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
>2004-12
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18549
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18563
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-11-11 16:29
---
Subject: Re: 3.4.3 ~6x+ performance regression vs 3.3.1,
constant trees not being computed.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-28 19:54 ---
Subject: Re: Disable building of fixincludes for avr target.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 19:53
>---
>But you
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-28 18:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=7425)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7425&action=view)
Proposed patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18151
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-25 20:33 ---
I've added the AVR mainters to the CC list of this bug.
Would one of the AVR maintainers (Denis, Marek) be willing to approve such a
change since this is a new feature?
Thanks
Eric
--
http://gcc.gn
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18151
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||marekm at amelek dot gda dot
||pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||denisc at overta dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18151
rsion: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ericw at evcohs dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: av
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ericw at evcohs dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-19 23:13 ---
Subject: Re: not using qi version of divmod
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-10-19 22:31 ---
>Subject: Re: not using qi version of
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-19 22:08 ---
Bug #10733 is related.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-14 18:37 ---
Would someone comment if the fix in comment #6 is correct? And could it be
applied to mainline to close out this bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7241
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17822
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17993
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-14 16:21 ---
See related bug #17462.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-13 13:45 ---
Subject: Re: Double target prefixed gcjh
On 13 Oct 2004 at 12:03, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-13 12:03
> ---
&g
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 22:18 ---
Subject: Re: Double target prefixed gcjh
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 21:20
>---
>I suppose you could try this.
&
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 19:14 ---
Subject: Re: Double target prefixed gcjh
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 19:08
>---
>Do you get a double prefix f
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-11 18:33 ---
Subject: Re: Duplicate executable installed in building cross
java compiler
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 18:30
>-
org
ReportedBy: ericw at evcohs dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
GCC target triplet: avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17939
82 matches
Mail list logo
