------- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-24 14:31 ------- Subject: Re: 4.0 bootstrap unreasonably requires 64-bit target type mode support.
schlie at comcast dot net wrote: >------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-24 14:22 >------- >Subject: Re: 4.0 bootstrap unreasonably requires > 64-bit target type mode support. > > > >>>>Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2005-02-24 14:04 >>>>Please explain why you think it is a bug for the avr to support long long. >>>> >>>> > >- I'll try to type it slower, but don't think it would help; what's being > asserted is that the support of 64-bit long long should not be required to > build the compiler. (Any particular reason you believe it should be?) > > The code in CVS works. Your personal change did not. You need to explain why you think your personal change, to not support 64-bit long long, should be the new default for the avr port. And you need to explain it on the gcc mailing list, not in the context of a GCC bug report that describes a bug in your personal experimental changes. And as a courtesy you should CC the AVR maintainers. Again, you're just restating what you've said earlier without giving a reason. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20143
