https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63526
--- Comment #5 from Dávid Éles ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #3)
> (In reply to Dávid Éles from comment #2)
> > I uses the default mechanism to initialization of members.
> > As far as I know the C++ standard says (8.5/5):
> > To
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63526
--- Comment #2 from Dávid Éles ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Why do you think the member should be zero-initialized? Your constructor
> fails to initialize it.
I uses the default mechanism to initialization of members.
As
: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: eles.david.88 at gmail dot com
Created attachment 33701
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33701&action=edit
Test case
It seems due to missi
