https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63526

            Bug ID: 63526
           Summary: O1 O2 O3 optimization and inline template constructor
                    - uninitialized member
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: eles.david.88 at gmail dot com

Created attachment 33701
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33701&action=edit
Test case

It seems due to missing zero-initialization in case of inline constructor, I
got a warning for uninitialized value for the following code:
------------- main.cpp ------------------------
#include <iostream>

template <class T>
struct Foo
{
  Foo()
  {}

  void foo()
  {std::cout << _foo << std::endl;}
  T _foo;
};

int main()
{
  Foo<double> f;
  f.foo();
  return 0;
}
------------------------------------------------
Compilation with "g++ -Wall", the result:
everything is ok.

Compilation with "g++ -Wall -O1", the result:
------------------------------------------------
main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:10:4: warning: ‘f.Foo<double>::_foo’ is used uninitialized in this
function [-Wuninitialized]
main.cpp:16:15: note: ‘f’ was declared here
------------------------------------------------
I got a same result with -O2, -O3.
If the constructor is not inline, everything is ok. 
It seems that due to optimization the constructor "is inlined", but not in a
prepare way, it "is inlined" without zero-initialization.

Environment information:
--------------------------------------------------
$uname -a
Linux debian 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.51-1 i686 GNU/Linux
$g++ --version
g++ (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
---------------------------------------------------
A same behavior can be observed in older releases and distributions:
---------------------------------------------------
$uname -a
Linux rdv 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Oct 27 11:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
$g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
---------------------------------------------------
But not in the version:
---------------------------------------------------
$g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-4)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
---------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to