https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118981
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119011
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
||il/gcc-patches/2025-Februar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
||gerald at pfeifer dot com
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
||il/gcc-patches/2025-January
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118664
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118636
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2025-01-22
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
I think the additional parentheses would be helpful; confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83732
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=86388
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
see also bug 86388 for the x86_64 equivalent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118466
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118458
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118371
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
So in other words, any bugs about diagnostics resulting from the default
standard now being -std=gnu23 would get put here?
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
||il/gcc-patches/2025-January
||/673040.html
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118349
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #0)
> > For example, one could do -Wtemplate-depth=17
> > -ftemplate-depth=1024 to get a warning when the pre-C++11 lim
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 87403
Target Milestone: ---
g++ currently has a flag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118010
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
]
|from static analyzer|False malloc leak warning
||from static analyzer
Keywords||needs-bisection
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118268
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118223
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118159
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108165
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
I think I've seen this, too; confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117865
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-16
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #2)
> I'm not sure what additional documentation needs to be added here, or if
> what's being requested is implementing a separate option/attribute just to
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116989
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117981
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98142
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> What kind of change could make it the default? It would be non-conforming,
> so can't just be the default.
>
> Do you mean a -fclosed-enums flag that implie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98142
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112840
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61759
--- Comment #19 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #18)
> This is the same bug?
>
> ```
> during GIMPLE pass: eh
> /opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_PPCSnowLeopardPorts_aqua_barrier/barrier/
> work/barrier-2.4.0/src
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=117873,
||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78829
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
Worth revisiting now that the default C standard is changing again
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117869
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117857
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
I think just ensuring that -D__DARWIN_UNIX03=1 is always passed to the
preprocessor ought to be enough...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19501
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64526
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> I am not sure if this needed any more since now () means the same as (void)
> with C23 and GCC defaults to C23 ...
Some people may still wish to compile for earl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117834
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117815
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #12)
> GCC lacks an equivalent for Clang's -Wdeprecated-non-prototype, right?
This has been added for GCC 15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99950
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Possibly related texinfo mail:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2024-11/msg00069.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117677
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117629
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/87a5f3w15a@mid.deneb.enyo.de/
>
> I wasn't interested in the idea before but it may be valuable. It would be
> better if we'd h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103459
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70800
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
Does someone want to bisect to find when exactly the fix arrived, or should we
just close this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40960
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/ossf/wg-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109310
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Also, the warning involved here not having its own
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> That doesn't really matter. Anybody who used the option in GCC 13/14 got
> that deprecation message.
They might not have seen it, though, as it is easy for war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
If this had been fixed previously, I probably wouldn't have gotten in the habit
of making my configure lines as long as I currently do!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94535
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||2024-10-29
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
Confirmed that the documentation still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77723
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101125
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93677
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80653
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37820
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to brian from comment #1)
> To list predefined macros, use -dM with an empty input file, e.g. "gcc
> -dM -E -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98021
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117263
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=103324
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Related: bug 103324 for a more general smoketest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113143
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #17)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #15)
> > This is one of the things blocking bug 46986, isn't it?
>
> ucontext is supported on macOS, AFAIK.
Only on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113143
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-16
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
Hm, that's strange, the Option Summary page says that it should be under x86
Options: https://gcc.gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117156
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 47170, which changed state.
Bug 47170 Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found resource leaks in
gcc/intl/localealias.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47170
What|Removed |Added
--
|--- |WONTFIX
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
GCC no longer contains this file; closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||WebRTC with PCH
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||ice-on
||PCH
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
retitling to clarify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92900
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> possibly related to bug 60972
...and, from the other direction, bug 68160 and bug 36566
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43301
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> we've got an idea that I just need to test
(well, either I, or someone else, I guess...)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108310
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|egallager at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to simon from comment #9)
> Created attachment 56140 [details]
> C demonstrator
>
> As noted in comment 8, the C compiler doesn’t have a problem with
> finding a file with a combining filename wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117059
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77502
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Antoni from comment #5)
> I believe so, but there might always be cases that we need to fix.
> Why do you ask? Did you get any issue?
I was just wondering if I could close it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #3)
> The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8415bceea9d3ca86adc00ae8ad92deaec0457dd1
>
> commit r14-7117-g8415bceea9d3ca86adc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117028
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116951
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||87403
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
I'd be careful to check how this interacts with the other switch-related
warnings; sometimes I've added a default case like that just to silenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112297
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #5)
> The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0eb6f8874047f7e7f13027aaac14d3de276c5e69
>
> commit r12-10370-g0eb6f88
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116794
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-21
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> The problem is that it's riscv (so 11 is prehistoric in that context) and
> it's also a huge generated file.
>
> tbh, I suspect if you re-run the failing command, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
well, I mean, it *ought* to be possible to bootstrap with GCC 11 as the host
compiler, right? The "transition to C++14" thread on the mailing lists was just
talking about raising the requirement for the host
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu
No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44032
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager ---
I'm hearing this came up at Cauldron this year... I wasn't there, so could
somebody who was summarize in this bug report for us?
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=37210
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #38 from Eric Gallager ---
Related: bug 37210 (in that they're both about cases where the build system
should warn the user about trying to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116744
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96842
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116642
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54140
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
||patch
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Jason has a patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662214.html
1 - 100 of 1314 matches
Mail list logo