https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774

--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> The problem is that it's riscv (so 11 is prehistoric in that context) and
> it's also a huge generated file.
> 
> tbh, I suspect if you re-run the failing command, it might even succeed. The
> riscv boards often aren't very stable..

Hm, indeed, I'm trying it without the `-j2` this time, and it seems to be
getting past that spot... maybe it was hitting some sort of resource limit due
to the parallelism?

Reply via email to