https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
--- Comment #18 from Dhruv Chawla ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> So if we add:
> if ((rand() & 1))
> arr[i] *= -1;
>
> For the initialization loop.
>
> And increase the 2D size from 256 to 1000 (th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
--- Comment #11 from Dhruv Chawla ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> Created https://github.com/UoB-HPC/TSVC_2/issues/8 for the issue in the
> benchmarking code. Let's see what they say too.
I think it is unlikely to get a reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
--- Comment #8 from Dhruv Chawla ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> I do have to wonder if splitting the path here helps because the condition
> (a[i] > 0.) Is predictable.
>
> I can't think it would be predictable but maybe on a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
--- Comment #5 from Dhruv Chawla ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Note there is also a fma forming missing:
> _69 = s_64 + 1.0e+0;
> ...
> _71 = _69 * _70;
>
> which is:
> `(s_64 + 1.0) * _70` which can be rewritten as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
--- Comment #1 from Dhruv Chawla ---
I'm not sure if this is an aarch64-specific issue or a middle-end issue, so
I've filed it under aarch64 for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118505
Bug ID: 118505
Summary: [15 regression] aarch64: 25% regression in TSVC s258
since r15-3436-gb2b20b277988ab
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118188
Bug ID: 118188
Summary: [15 regression] aarch64: 30% regression in TSVC s4115
since r15-5565-gdbc38dd9e96a99
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117801
--- Comment #12 from Dhruv Chawla ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> Created attachment 59722 [details]
> patch
>
> This patch passed bootstrap & regtest on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I did
> not check whether it solves the aar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117801
Bug ID: 117801
Summary: aarch64: 20% regression in TSVC s278 since
r15-3509-gd34cda72098867
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117477
--- Comment #4 from Dhruv Chawla ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Do you have a testcase which comes from some real code that shows the issue
> or is this just noticed from the small testcase you produced?
Hi, I noticed this oc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117477
Bug ID: 117477
Summary: aarch64: Unnecessary stack spill generated around
function call
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
11 matches
Mail list logo
