http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2013-04-19 18:18:19
UTC ---
Kai's patch applied cleanly for me vs. Revision: 197992 and allowed my failed
build to proceed as far as stage 3 where it failed on libjava (known issue).
I'm going to rerun the bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
Bug #: 56975
Summary: [regression] dllimport broken on i686-pc-cygwin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39933
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phantall at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Dave Korn 2011-12-08 12:10:35
UTC ---
Same as bug 39933.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39933 ***
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Dave Korn 2011-12-08 12:10:28
UTC ---
Same as bug 39933.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39933 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39933
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ich at az2000 dot de
--- Comment #4 from Dave
||2011-12-08
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.4.0 |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.4.0
--- Comment #3 from Dave Korn 2011-12-08 12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51095
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2011-12-07 00:46:18
UTC ---
> we may as well resume the discussion here
"there", not "here", sorry for any confusion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=864
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at grondar dot org
--- Comment #21 from Da
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Dave Korn 2011-12-07 00:45:10
UTC ---
Confirmed. I would also like to see the patch in Attachment 18256 applied.
I have re-opened bug 864 because there is (what I think is) a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=864
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed||2011-12-06
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.4.0 |4.7.0
Resolution|FIXED |
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #61 from Dave Korn 2011-04-21 00:40:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> I review the patch, and found that we can add "-fno-keep-inline-dllexport" to
> the compiler option, and then, the compiler and linker stage works well. But
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2011-04-07 22:22:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > The correct fix is going to be in the linker, not the compiler, by
> > implementing
> > a second library scan pass and obsoleting the pass-through mechanism.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2011-04-07 15:51:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 23913
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23913
WIP patch
Work in progress: see comment at start of do_rescan_work() re DT_NEEDED libs,
but should be wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2011-04-07 15:49:29
UTC ---
Well, this is basically a weakness in the pass-through solution implemented for
PR 42690; it only knows about the compilers stdlibs, and doesn't process any
user-specified libs on the comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #56 from Dave Korn 2011-04-07 15:15:14
UTC ---
What works for me on Cygwin, and so may well also work for anyone using MSYS,
is setting the heap_chunk_in_mb registry parameter to some value in the range
1024 - 1536. I use 1024 myself
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43157
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2011-02-12 20:27:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 23321
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23321
potential fix
With this patch, ld doesn't check the arch/mach/lang/etc. of dummy IR-only BFDs
any more.
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2011-02-12 17:48:46
UTC ---
Hi guys, yes, this is definitely a linker bug, what must be happening is that
there's some kind of private data not getting copied from the
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 19:17:04
UTC ---
I could be wrong (reopen the bug if I turn out to be mistaken), but I'll bet
this is the same as PR47274: the IR symtabs are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #30 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 19:17:04
UTC ---
*** Bug 47287 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827
--- Comment #14 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 17:37:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> [ ... ] -fsplit-stack [ ... ] need for gold as host linker [ ... ]
One of the ELF guys will have to answer that one for you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #28 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 06:59:58
UTC ---
It looks like the problem is much earlier than the linker; it looks like the IR
symtabs in the input object files are being generated incorrectly. Here are
the real symbol tables:
$ ./o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827
--- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2011-02-01 04:03:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Recreated this on linux x86_64 with gcc 4.6-20110129. Running ulimit -a shows
> me that the default stack limit is 8192 and increasing this to 18000 allows
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #25 from Dave Korn 2011-01-31 19:40:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> > What endian-ness are the ppc and hppa targets?
>
> hppa is big. I believe ppc is also big.
>
> Dave
Probably the first time this code has been tested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #23 from Dave Korn 2011-01-31 18:53:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> The problem is that first one is defined as prevailing_def_ironly while it is
> not an definition, just use of the symbol. Correct would be to have
> PREVAILI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #15 from Dave Korn 2011-01-28 15:28:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> The test is invalid on i[345]86-*-* without also enabling -msse.
Does the same apply to libcpp/lex.c? i.e. Is that code invalid unless
compiled with -msse2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47468
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-cygwin
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47468
--- Comment #1 from Dave Korn 2011-01-26 04:47:09
UTC ---
Created attachment 23128
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23128
preprocessed source for testcase (first failing test)
This is what causes:
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-la
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47468
Summary: FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/*
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40125
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2011-01-10 15:28:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> the optimize attribute isn't used in the preprocessed file but only the
> target attribute which is supported. Thus, "worksforme".
Target attributes must be im
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|davek at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2011-01-10 00:33:35
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Mon Jan 10 00:33:32 2011
New Revision: 168624
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168624
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c++/47218
* cgraphunit.c (as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #49 from Dave Korn 2011-01-09 17:30:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 22935
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22935
trial patch
brings the earlier change that nathan made to always keep dllexported inlines
under control
||2011.01.09 17:25:25
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2011-01-09 00:47:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 22932
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22932
proposed patch
Ensures thunks get a section name assigned in cgraphunit.c#assemble_thunk().
Taking this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2011-01-08 19:00:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Bug is caused by the change at rev 167795 applied to fix PR46667.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=167795
Full details at http://gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2011-01-08 18:06:07
UTC ---
Bug is caused by the change at rev 167795 applied to fix PR46667.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=167795
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2011-01-08 16:35:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> A simple test in PR47116:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22866
Thankyou, that should make debugging it easier :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Summary: [4.6.0 regression] C++ multiple definitions of
non-virtual thunk problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #27 from Dave Korn 2010-12-19 11:14:23
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Sun Dec 19 11:14:19 2010
New Revision: 168047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168047
Log:
PR middle-end/46674
PR middle-end/46221
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2010-12-19 11:14:23
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Sun Dec 19 11:14:19 2010
New Revision: 168047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168047
Log:
PR middle-end/46674
PR middle-end/46221
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #11 from Dave Korn 2010-12-15 16:17:54
UTC ---
Created attachment 22765
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22765
Lower all C identifiers to actual assembler symbols for comparison.
This should resolve the problem by
,
|alpha-linux |alpha-linux, i?86-pc-cygwin
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends on||46674
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46938
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46938
--- Comment #2 from Dave Korn 2010-12-15 09:51:30
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Wed Dec 15 09:51:26 2010
New Revision: 167848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167848
Log:
PR testsuite/46938
* gcc.dg/pr43157.c: Add dg-r
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dave Korn 2010-12-15 09:29:22
UTC ---
Patch got approved while I was out of town for a couple of days, will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45201
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29710
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-12-11 10:46:22
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Although I haven't verified that this is the same as the original problem
> report, it really looks like it, modulo various changes to the compiler's
> internal
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.2.0 |4.6.0
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2010-12-11 10:17:11
UTC ---
I've run into what appears to be the same problem with 4.6.0 HEAD in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #13 from Dave Korn 2010-12-11 04:34:07
UTC ---
Didn't crop up in my latest testrun (based on r.167484 / 20101206), so whatever
it was seems to have gone away.
gcc dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43157
--- Comment #8 from Dave Korn 2010-12-10 14:29:03
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Fri Dec 10 14:28:58 2010
New Revision: 167688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167688
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/46674
PR lto/4315
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #10 from Dave Korn 2010-12-10 14:29:03
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Fri Dec 10 14:28:58 2010
New Revision: 167688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167688
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/46674
PR lto/431
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43157
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46859
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-12-08 14:19:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I stumbled into the underlying cause of this bug
Should clarify: I'm referring to the broken-ness referred to in comments 1 and
4. My patch probably won't mak
||2010.12.08 14:10:43
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Dave Korn 2010-12-08 05:57:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Subject: Re: Driver core dump when duplicating -Wall
> command line option
>
> Unless this can be rep
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WORKSFORME
--- Comment #1 from Dave Korn 2010-12-07 23:26:26
UTC ---
Couldn't reproduce this on the released 4.5.0 nor on 4.6.0 current trunk, so I
assume this was a transient thing that got fixed. Plea
||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2010-12-07 04:31:08
UTC ---
Not fixed on platforms where USER_LABEL_PREFIX is non-empty. On
i686-pc-cygwin:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46674.c scan-assembler wobbly
Stripping the star
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 17:27:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> sdbout.c is broken then.
Quite likely, but I don't understand what it thinks it's trying to do yet
well enough to be sure how.
> If it doesn't care in which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40125
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 00:54:23
UTC ---
That still leaves libffi and libgcc_s to fix; I'll get to them shortly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 00:50:11
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Mon Dec 6 00:50:04 2010
New Revision: 167480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167480
Log:
config/ChangeLog:
2010-12-06 Dave Korn
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40125
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 00:50:11
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Mon Dec 6 00:50:04 2010
New Revision: 167480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167480
Log:
config/ChangeLog:
2010-12-06 Dave Korn
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #11 from Dave Korn 2010-12-04 06:28:48
UTC ---
Created attachment 22626
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22626
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #10 from Dave Korn 2010-12-04 06:28:04
UTC ---
Created attachment 22625
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22625
generated assembler
This is the assembler output that has been generated up to the point when it
ICEs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40125
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22549|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |lto
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2010-12-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||42690
AssignedTo|davek at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #14 from Dave Korn 2010-12-02 08:52:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> > Yeh, precisely. The ironly file is a placeholder into which we put the
> > symbols found in the lto symtab so that they can take part in the link and
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2010-12-02 07:47:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -o build/genchecksum \
> build/genchecksum.o .././libiberty/libiberty.a
> lto1: sorry, unimplemented: combining units
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2010-12-02 07:14:34
UTC ---
With my patch we no longer get the undefined symbols building lto-wrapper,
but instead later on we hit this problem:
---
||2010.12.02 04:57:41
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Dave Korn 2010-12-02 04:57:41
UTC ---
Created attachment 22600
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2010-12-01 12:31:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> > not I,
> > the addition of -no-undefined was from the Dave K. who needs it to get a
> > .dll
> > to build
> > - without that ch
||2010.12.01 12:17:35
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42904
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
|davek at gcc dot gnu.org|ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2010-11-30 17:31:32
UTC ---
Yes, Kai's patch (see URL) works for -fwhole-program as well as LTO :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46709
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dave Korn 2010-11-29 21:02:17
UTC
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo