http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Robb 2012-07-02 13:41:11
UTC ---
thank you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Robb 2012-07-02 12:44:49
UTC ---
As this was a mistake in the language in the standard is should be a
warning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Robb 2012-06-30 06:23:28
UTC ---
template< int n>
class Class {
public:
static int const _n = n;
I thought that _n was defined.
On 29/06/2012 23:01, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Robb 2012-06-29 20:41:08
UTC ---
template < int n >
class Class {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810
Bug #: 53810
Summary: template class static not defined
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
