http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Robb <ajrobb57 at gmail dot com> 2012-06-30 06:23:28
UTC ---
template< int n>
class Class {
public:
static int const _n = n;
I thought that _n was defined.
On 29/06/2012 23:01, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810
>
> --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski<pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-29
> 22:01:07 UTC ---
> GCC is having the correct behavior. You don't have a definition for the
> static
> const class variable, only the declaration. You need the definition as you
> implictly take the address of the variable (via a reference).
>
