https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48379
Adam Badura changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adam.f.badura at gmail dot com
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: adam.f.badura at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Consider sample code (https://godbolt.org/z/7T3vGefEq):
```
#include
#include
template
auto foo()
{
return std::printf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111087
--- Comment #9 from Adam Badura ---
Is there any option to improve the warning so that it is not generated in cases
that are valid. I mean, to make it flow-dependent?
How it works now? What it takes into account and how to phrase the code to
av
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111087
--- Comment #7 from Adam Badura ---
So, the cases I described here _is_ a false-positive, however, an expected one.
Do I understand this correctly?
However, consider the code:
class class1
{
public:
bool method1() const;
};
bool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111087
--- Comment #5 from Adam Badura ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The warning is correct as tags.end() and tags.begin() will always be a
> nullptr for std::array
Yes. But what does it change?
`std::lower_bound` gets an empty ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111087
--- Comment #2 from Adam Badura ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Zero sized arrays are a gcc extension.
The problem is with `std::array` rather than C-array. It seems to me
`std::array` can have `0` size - it is not an extensio
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: adam.f.badura at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
At least for GCC 10.2 and 12.2, when using -std=c++20 I'm getting unexpected
-Wnonnull in the following (simplified)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107802
--- Comment #3 from Adam Badura ---
Why is this marked as a duplicate of bug 98487? I have seen bug 98487 before
reporting it. Furthermore, I experienced it while trying my code sample on the
trunk version to see if the problem still exists.
Ho
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: adam.f.badura at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I checked the issue with GCC 10.2 and trunk as on Compiler Explorer using
arguments
-std=c++17 -O3 -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Wsuggest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011
--- Comment #6 from Adam Badura ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> IMHO -x c++ should be sufficient to cause cc1plus to be used.
I fully agree! However, it would mean the parameter would have to change its
meaning (be extended)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011
--- Comment #4 from Adam Badura ---
(In reply to Adam Badura from comment #3)
> (In reply to Vladislav Ivanishin from comment #1)
>
> > > Is there any workaround for versions older than trunk?
> >
> >
> > Using the executable for the appropria
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011
--- Comment #3 from Adam Badura ---
(In reply to Vladislav Ivanishin from comment #1)
> > Is there any workaround for versions older than trunk?
>
>
> Using the executable for the appropriate language frontend directly:
>
> `gcc --print-file-
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: adam.f.badura at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
My g++ -v outputs
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=g++
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/x86_64/7.3.0a-1/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7.3.0/lt
13 matches
Mail list logo
