This is bug 41698. Please send a patch to gcc-patches, including the
addition of a testcase to the testsuite.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
didn't intend to remove gcc-bugs, that's noise.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
ntal removal of gcc-bugs, all bugs in the gcc product should always
have gcc-bugs in their CC lists - but please add it back to the bugs from
which you removed it.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
e of "foo" == "foo" is
unspecified, but given
const char *return_foo (void) { return "foo"; }
the value of return_foo () == return_foo () must be 1.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
eantime.
This no longer appears and was probably fixed by:
2008-05-06 Tom Tromey
PR preprocessor/35313, PR preprocessor/36088:
* expr.c (optab) : Set precedence to 4.
(reduce) : Special case CPP_COMMA and CPP_COLON.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> Flexible array member isn't allowed in union:
However, a union may contain a structure that in turn contains a flexible
array member. And a union may contain a union containing such a
structure, and so on.
--
Joseph S. M
gnu89 mode.
If you use -std=c99 without -pedantic-errors you get a duplicate warning:
t.c:1: warning: inline function 'foo' declared but never defined
t.c:1: warning: inline function 'foo' declared but never defined
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
3 should delay moving to regression-only
mode for 4.4 (which is what the choice of P2 or P4 is about), feel free to
set them back to P3 for another RM to look at them.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the type and is not just "struct A;", it refers
to the previous type of that tag (6.7.2.3#9, paragraph numbering from
N1256). Referring to a union type with "struct" in turn violates
paragraph 2 (added in C99 TC3 following DR#251).
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
; target?
Seems reasonable.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h, but we need to fix trunk first.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
quot;, the initial "3" requires func(3) to be evaluated between
the evaluation of func(1) and its dereference, so func(3) is evaluated
after func(1); but likewise the final "1" requires func(1) to be evaluated
after func(3).
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ecl would never have been set to
non-null anyway. Restoring
fundecl = function;
in the if (TREE_CODE (function) == FUNCTION_DECL) part of
build_function_call should fix the particular ICE, but the problem with
function pointers should still get a PR filed.
--
Joseph S. Myer
s to what to suggest.
Are you sure you aren't confusing the lines in
apzAab_Fd_Zero_Asm_Posix_Types_HPatch (with \\\n\) with those in
apzAab_Fd_Zero_Gnu_Types_HPatch (with \n\)?
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail)
ariables are set for the
testsuite, though there may be a "right" place in the dejagnu files
somewhere.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
15 matches
Mail list logo
