https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119543
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Tang <2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn> ---
Dear Andrew Pinski,
Thank you very much for your prompt response and especially for providing the
well-defined implementation of the isTmax function.
I appreciate you takin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119543
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Tang <2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn> ---
Dear Andrew Pinski,
Thank you very much for your prompt response and especially for providing the
well-defined implementation of the isTmax function.
I appreciate you tak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119543
Bug ID: 119543
Summary: At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax
function to always return 0
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119542
Bug ID: 119542
Summary: At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax
function to always return 0
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi