[Bug tree-optimization/119543] At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax function to always return 0

2025-03-30 Thread 2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119543 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Tang <2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn> --- Dear Andrew Pinski, Thank you very much for your prompt response and especially for providing the well-defined implementation of the isTmax function. I appreciate you takin

[Bug tree-optimization/119543] At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax function to always return 0

2025-03-30 Thread 2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119543 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Tang <2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn> --- Dear Andrew Pinski, Thank you very much for your prompt response and especially for providing the well-defined implementation of the isTmax function. I appreciate you tak

[Bug tree-optimization/119543] New: At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax function to always return 0

2025-03-30 Thread 2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119543 Bug ID: 119543 Summary: At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax function to always return 0 Product: gcc Version: 13.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/119542] New: At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax function to always return 0

2025-03-30 Thread 2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119542 Bug ID: 119542 Summary: At -O1 and higher, GCC incorrectly optimizes isTmax function to always return 0 Product: gcc Version: 13.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi