https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119543

--- Comment #5 from Kevin Tang <2023152001 at email dot szu.edu.cn> ---
Dear Andrew Pinski,

Thank you very much for your prompt response and especially for providing the
well-defined implementation of the isTmax function.

I appreciate you taking the time not only to explain why my original
implementation was problematic but also to provide a standards-compliant
alternative that preserves the core logic of my function.

The resources you shared about undefined behavior will be very helpful for my
future programming work. This was a valuable lesson in writing robust, portable
C code.

Thank you again for your help!

Best regards,
Kevin Tang

Reply via email to