https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121093
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
we don't elide inlined_function_outer_scope_p IIRC, so not sure why this would
happen? But the flow of conditions is a bit odd:
/* When not generating debug info we can eliminate info on unused
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113264
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiangchangwu at smail dot
nju.edu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121079
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121096
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 61879
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61879&action=edit
testcase with less compiler flags
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -Os -mstringop-strategy=unrolled_loop -mtune=btver2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121107
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121106
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121108
Bug ID: 121108
Summary: [16 Regression] ICE: in setmem_epilogue_gen_val, at
config/i386/i386-expand.cc:8438 with
-mstringop-strategy=rep_4byte
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121107
Bug ID: 121107
Summary: ICE at O2: in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at
ipa-prop.cc:4052
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121106
Bug ID: 121106
Summary: ICE at O2: in expand_fn_using_insn, at
internal-fn.cc:268
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121105
Bug ID: 121105
Summary: `svfloat32x4_t{}` does not zero the registers
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121104
Bug ID: 121104
Summary: ICE at O2: verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool, bool)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121103
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121103
Bug ID: 121103
Summary: ICE at O2: in single_succ_edge, at basic-block.h:332
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bic60176 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121102
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121102
Bug ID: 121102
Summary: ICE at O2: in make_ssa_name_fn, at
tree-ssanames.cc:355
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121101
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-16
Component|tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121101
Bug ID: 121101
Summary: ICE at O2: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.cc:1113
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121100
Bug ID: 121100
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault at contains_struct_check
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121060
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82e912344d28cf1a69e5f8e047203ea7eb625302
commit r16-2282-g82e912344d28cf1a69e5f8e047203ea7eb625302
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121099
--- Comment #1 from LIU Hao ---
Given `y` in XMM0 and `x` in XMM1, `_mm_set_ps(x, x, y, y)` is clearly just
`vshufps xmm2, xmm0, xmm1, 0` no matter what.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121081
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121099
Bug ID: 121099
Summary: GCC doesn't optimize `_mm_set_ps()` very well
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738
Kishan Parmar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from Kishan Par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82134
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32ff6f4728e4021ff33fb1da6eb3bafe3ea5a15e
commit r16-2280-g32ff6f4728e4021ff33fb1da6eb3bafe3ea5a15e
Author: Jeremy Rifkin
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121089
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121089
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121089
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
--- Comment #1 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120378
--- Comment #7 from Edwin Lu ---
Progress update:
After discussing with Vineet and Robin, the optab for generating vnclipu does
exist through IFN_SAT_TRUNC, which can be seen in a couple of the saturating
arithmetic testcases Pan has been workin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121086
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So I think it is trying to print out the field name but since this is an
anonymous bitfield, it is crashing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121086
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.4.6
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121083
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced:
```
struct Xint
{
int x;
};
auto x = new Xint[3]({[0]=20});
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121097
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121097
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Sure, we could do, but I'm not convinced it's a real issue, only a hypothetical
one. Your config seems self-inflicted, due to an incomplete emulation of GCC 10
(which did define __cpp_fold_expressions).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120792
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a521eee58da7c0d0f2262181b804aa148e60aaf
commit r16-2274-g2a521eee58da7c0d0f2262181b804aa148e60aaf
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
Summary|Possibly unne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121098
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121097
--- Comment #4 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #1)
> > Er, PC-Lint 2.0 with a config file that *we* made
>
> Don't do that then? or change your config file to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121097
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #1)
> Er, PC-Lint 2.0 with a config file that *we* made to roughly emulate GCC 10,
> apparently. I can't blame PC-Lint itself for the weird setting of these
> macro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121097
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121095
--- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
My take, without having any serious knowledge of what's going on, is:
If a C function doesn't involve (set, read, manipulate, ...) FP8 values or the
fpmr register in any way, then this PRE pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120986
--- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
I'm now going to be away until Mon 4th August, so won't be able to post the
re-spun patches until then (although they are ready to go and have passed
testing).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121098
Bug ID: 121098
Summary: target macro HARDREG_PRE_REGNOS is NOT documented
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation, internal-improvement
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120577
--- Comment #7 from Nikolas Klauser ---
The patch fixes the non-reduced reproducer as well. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #28)
> It seems that to get -Wunused-but-set-parameter=3 implicitly, one needs
> -Wextra (contrary to -Wunused-but-set-variable=3). So the condition
>
> -Wunused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121097
--- Comment #1 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
Er, PC-Lint 2.0 with a config file that *we* made to roughly emulate GCC 10,
apparently. I can't blame PC-Lint itself for the weird setting of these macros.
:)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121097
Bug ID: 121097
Summary: hypot uses __promoted_t even when
__cpp_fold_expressions is not defined
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121091
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-July/689666.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119962
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0828600f586e75a2056a4fc7eb0a340c363d6c66
commit r16-2271-g0828600f586e75a2056a4fc7eb0a340c363d6c66
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35b19980046fc57d9d6851b8f4349bd22de3fa03
commit r16-2270-g35b19980046fc57d9d6851b8f4349bd22de3fa03
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7dcb64479e0cc590641a505b8fe1fd542f22a38f
commit r15-9980-g7dcb64479e0cc590641a505b8fe1fd542f22a38f
Author: Gaius Mulley
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89025
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108409
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-*aix* *-*-mingw* |*-*aix*
Summary|std::chron
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121091
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Simplified testcase:
```
#include "arm_sve.h"
svbool_t e(int mode) {
svbool_t pg;
switch (mode) {
case 0:
pg = svptrue_pat_b16(SV_VL6);
break;
case 1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121094
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Prokoptsev ---
I don't think so -- this does repro on the current master, which has the fix
for bug 120273
(https://gcc.gnu.org/cgit/gcc/commit/?id=3b95be7bd1882add4b1e22f6b70bc130cd465eca).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117836
Bug 117836 depends on bug 119862, which changed state.
Bug 119862 Summary: [16 Regression] gcc.dg/pr119160.c FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119862
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118945
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119862
ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117836
Bug 117836 depends on bug 119884, which changed state.
Bug 119884 Summary: [16 Regression] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4636
with -O2 -fno-dse -favoid-store-forwarding since r16-15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119884
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119884
ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119901
ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120553
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117836
Bug 117836 depends on bug 119901, which changed state.
Bug 119901 Summary: wrong code with -O -favoid-store-forwarding
-mprefer-vector-width=none -mavx2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119901
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120404
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120479
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Deferring indefinitely as I don't see a way to generate a czero right now due
to the multiple use issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120603
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smunnangi1 at ventanamicro dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120811
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smunnangi1 at ventanamicro dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121019
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Per call today, deferring this idefinitely. If someone wants to pick it up,
then by all means, please do. It's just not that high a priority.
rap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250715 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104428
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Kwok Yeung :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9965c37cd153b7764f147a77489db9827071ad0
commit r15-9979-gc9965c37cd153b7764f147a77489db9827071ad0
Author: Kwok Cheung Yeung
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121095
Bug ID: 121095
Summary: Possibly unnecessary PRE pass on aarch64 for fpmr
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121094
Bug ID: 121094
Summary: ICE on `co_await (obj->*func)(args...)`
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108409
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e28494e08092c4096a015563c0ba0494ce1edf81
commit r16-2267-ge28494e08092c4096a015563c0ba0494ce1edf81
Author: Björn Schäpers
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121038
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen ---
Better use set -e instead of explicit exit checks.
Yes it's dumb design in the tool, it could just stream the data. In fact if it
did that we could use the perf pipe mode to not even create a temporary file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120577
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f23b5df56e237df9f66b615ca4babc564d5f75de
commit r16-2265-gf23b5df56e237df9f66b615ca4babc564d5f75de
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117784
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9956dc37cb3d71c1fc7a89b45cc291645c11817b
commit r16-2264-g9956dc37cb3d71c1fc7a89b45cc291645c11817b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121038
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
I experimented with smaller sampling period and indeed create_gcov then runs
out of memory. On my setup create_gcov was simply segfaulting and produced just
partial profile. Since Makefile does not fail on cr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Thomas de Bock from comment #18)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17)
> > As I commented at
> >
> > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/75ff8af8-af03-42fa-b68b-
> > e6c16a34c...@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17)
> As I commented at
>
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/75ff8af8-af03-42fa-b68b-
> e6c16a34c...@redhat.com/
>
> we could optimize the dynamic_cast to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121093
Bug ID: 121093
Summary: Missed location of inlined function
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164
--- Comment #18 from Thomas de Bock ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17)
> As I commented at
>
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/75ff8af8-af03-42fa-b68b-
> e6c16a34c...@redhat.com/
>
> we could optimize the dynamic_cast to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
As I commented at
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/75ff8af8-af03-42fa-b68b-e6c16a34c...@redhat.com/
we could optimize the dynamic_cast to type_info::operator== instead of vtable
comparison.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164
--- Comment #16 from Thomas de Bock ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Sure, but that is the only way how to make the optimization reliable.
> If the a local type (i.e. mangled for RTTI with * character at the start),
> it can jus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104428
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kwok Yeung :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a05c4f4ee48f76e518dbd2a96e5083f4df833df7
commit r16-2263-ga05c4f4ee48f76e518dbd2a96e5083f4df833df7
Author: Kwok Cheung Yeung
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 10.5.0, 16.0
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121091
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
# pg_3 = PHI
So not a POLY_INT_CST but rather a VECTOR_CST that does not have a constant
size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120660
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
The difference between OK and BAD is:
$ diff -u OK.S BAD.S
--- OK.S2025-07-15 16:39:49.437945918 +0200
+++ BAD.S 2025-07-15 16:39:53.377945956 +0200
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
@ GNU C23 (GCC) version 1
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
