[Bug tree-optimization/115016] [14/15/16 regression] False positive -Wfree-nonheap-object using std::vector with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115016 Christian Helmuth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christian.helmuth@genode-la

[Bug c++/115048] warning "operator delete called on pointer '' with nonzero offset"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115048 Christian Helmuth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christian.helmuth@genode-la

[Bug c/120375] arc: -mcpu=em x >> 31 clobber of CC isn't respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120375 --- Comment #1 from keithp at keithp dot com --- gcc was configured as follows: ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-multilib --enable-multilib-space --disable-gcov --disable-decimal-float --disable-libffi --disable-libgomp --disab

[Bug c/120375] New: arc: -mcpu=em x >> 31 clobber of CC isn't respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120375 Bug ID: 120375 Summary: arc: -mcpu=em x >> 31 clobber of CC isn't respected Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.1.0, 14.2.0 Summary|[15/1

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95c74f354ae3186e84fbada22d2e7f3845dbb659 commit r16-769-g95c74f354ae3186e84fbada22d2e7f3845dbb659 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tue

[Bug fortran/119928] [15/16 Regression] Bogus "Interface mismatch" in gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_52.f90 with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Comm

[Bug fortran/120371] [15.1 regression] erroneously triggered error message on non-matching interfaces with flag -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120371 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2 Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/120367] [15/16 Regression] C++23 ranges::transform | ranges::to exception catching (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120367 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/120372] canonicalize_comparison uses gen_move_insn to calcualate the cost of the constant formation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120372 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/684328.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/684329.html (with extra comments added compared to the patch attached here and

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/684319.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/120374] ext-dce fails to realize a shift pair makes bits dead

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120374 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/120374] New: ext-dce fails to realize a shift pair makes bits dead

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120374 Bug ID: 120374 Summary: ext-dce fails to realize a shift pair makes bits dead Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug c/80400] missing -Wattributes on a invalid attribute packed on a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80400 Campbell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rlcamp.pdx at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug middle-end/118994] GCC fails to optimize (a >> 1) + (b >> 1) + ((a | b) & 1) to PAVGB/PAVGW (or equivalent instruction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118994 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72f0b446d2c03866ebe4cae125e32fef598e924d commit r16-767-g72f0b446d2c03866ebe4cae125e32fef598e924d Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Feb 2

[Bug middle-end/118994] GCC fails to optimize (a >> 1) + (b >> 1) + ((a | b) & 1) to PAVGB/PAVGW (or equivalent instruction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118994 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120363] internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/120362] [GCC-15.1] Illegal Insn when run spec2017 511 ref size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120362 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Waterman --- > Let us summon the RISC-V judge!!! The key is that vtype.vill affects only those instructions that depend on vtype. vlr and vsr do not depend on vtype and so are unaffected by vtype.vill. > vmv1r also

[Bug c++/120273] [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral since r15-3148-g6303cd7e41546e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/119324] cppcheck meets /cobol/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- cppcheck says a lot of things that are true but not useful. I use the following grep command to find the more interesting material: grep -E "performance:| error:| warning:| style:" filename

[Bug c++/120373] New: operator overloads inside extern "C"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120373 Bug ID: 120373 Summary: operator overloads inside extern "C" Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority

[Bug middle-end/118694] OpenMP: target/metadirective/teams directive nesting gives error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118694 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 61485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61485&action=edit test case metadirective-1a.c with dynamic selector Hmmm, interesting. I temporarily #ifdef'ed out

[Bug c++/120273] [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral since r15-3148-g6303cd7e41546e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- ``` [...] ==838291== Invalid read of size 1 ==838291==at 0x8EB7F10: __strcmp_avx2 (strcmp-avx2.S:249) ==838291==by 0x5EF52CE: UnknownInlinedFun (splay-tree.c:151) ==838291==by 0x5EF52CE: UnknownInlin

[Bug cobol/119324] cppcheck meets /cobol/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324 --- Comment #4 from Robert Dubner --- I fear that my ignorance is holed up in a bit of a fortress. I have installed Cppcheck 2.7 on an Ubuntu 22.04 LTS x86_64 system. When I try to run it on just one file that you mention, I get the following.

[Bug libstdc++/120367] [15/16 Regression] C++23 ranges::transform | ranges::to exception catching (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120367 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug cobol/119883] codegen: recursive user-defined functions don't run recursive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119883 --- Comment #3 from Robert Dubner --- (In reply to James K. Lowden from comment #2) > The issue appears to boil down to YYLTYPE and YDFLTYPE, which are identical, > being defined differently somehow, somewhere. A clue perhaps: in > gcc/cobol/ut

[Bug middle-end/120372] canonicalize_comparison uses gen_move_insn to calcualate the cost of the constant formation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120372 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61484 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61484&action=edit Fix for both the middle-end part and the backend part

[Bug c++/120318] Module deduced return type error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120318 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/120372] canonicalize_comparison uses gen_move_insn to calcualate the cost of the constant formation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/120372] New: canonicalize_comparison uses gen_move_insn to calcualate the cost of the constant formation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120372 Bug ID: 120372 Summary: canonicalize_comparison uses gen_move_insn to calcualate the cost of the constant formation Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/120371] [15.1 regression] erroneously triggered error message on non-matching interfaces with flag -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120371 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > Jürgen, > > this is likely a duplicate of pr119928/pr120163 and has been fixed after > the 15.1 release. > > Either upgrade to 15-HEAD, or use -Wno-external-argument-

[Bug fortran/120371] [15.1 regression] erroneously triggered error message on non-matching interfaces with flag -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120371 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/102599] Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-5-20 Keywords

[Bug c++/120370] GCC fails to parse a trailing requires-clause that ends with an identifier when followed by a ctor-initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120370 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/120370] GCC fails to parse a trailing requires-clause that ends with an identifier when followed by a ctor-initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120370 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Simple workaround is to do `(i)`.

[Bug fortran/120371] New: [15.1 regression] erroneously triggered error message on non-matching interfaces with flag -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120371 Bug ID: 120371 Summary: [15.1 regression] erroneously triggered error message on non-matching interfaces with flag -Wall Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61482 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61482&action=edit Patch which I am testing

[Bug cobol/119883] codegen: recursive user-defined functions don't run recursive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119883 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Assignee|rdubner at gcc

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I think I know the issue. it comes down to the LHS of __builtin_cabs is NULL.

[Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/120369] [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61481 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61481&action=edit No header version

[Bug c++/120370] New: GCC fails to parse a trailing requires-clause that ends with an identifier when followed by a ctor-initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120370 Bug ID: 120370 Summary: GCC fails to parse a trailing requires-clause that ends with an identifier when followed by a ctor-initializer Product: gcc Version: 15.1

[Bug c/120369] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369 Bug ID: 120369 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: cplxlower0 only in version 15.1 and trunk Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug fortran/102891] Passing real part of complex type component using w%z%re to a subroutine gives erroneous value of dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/102891] Passing real part of complex type component using w%z%re to a subroutine gives erroneous value of dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6683c729663299cdcc401248dce63ea16fc8357e commit r15-9718-g6683c729663299cdcc401248dce63ea16fc8357e Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug target/120360] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120360 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is hack to avoid emitting constants that match the endbr64 or endbr32 instructions in the immediates. Normally that is done when checking the immediates, but here they are negated and I didn't want to

[Bug cobol/119632] section segments (cobol85) not implemented, "ignored" -> raising compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119632 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119810] FE: -include does not unset "included from"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119810 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug cobol/119771] FE (parser): CONSTANT AS LENGTH OF does not error - but result in length of zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119771 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug target/120360] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120360 --- Comment #5 from Linus Torvalds --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > > Untested fix for #c2/#c3. We already had *cmp_minus_1 pattern which > handles the case where result of subtraction is used solely in comparison > against ze

[Bug target/120360] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120360 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61480 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61480&action=edit gcc16-pr120360.patch Untested fix for #c2/#c3. We already had *cmp_minus_1 pattern which handles the case whe

[Bug cobol/119772] FE: COBOL2025/2026 (original GnuCOBOL extension) LENGTH OF usage-specification missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119772 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119772] FE: COBOL2025/2026 (original GnuCOBOL extension) LENGTH OF usage-specification missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119772 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 commit r16-764-gfba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 Author: Robert Dubner Date: Tu

[Bug cobol/119790] FE (parser): CONSTANT AS figurative-constant broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119790 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug cobol/119770] FLOAT-DECIMAL support + "cannot MOVE '_stack1'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119770 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119632] section segments (cobol85) not implemented, "ignored" -> raising compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119632 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 commit r16-764-gfba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 Author: Robert Dubner Date: T

[Bug cobol/119335] cobol frontend ignores -M

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119335 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 commit r16-764-gfba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 Author: Robert Dubner Date: Tu

[Bug cobol/119810] FE: -include does not unset "included from"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119810 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 commit r16-764-gfba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 Author: Robert Dubner Date: Tu

[Bug cobol/119770] FLOAT-DECIMAL support + "cannot MOVE '_stack1'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119770 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 commit r16-764-gfba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 Author: Robert Dubner Date: Tu

[Bug cobol/119771] FE (parser): CONSTANT AS LENGTH OF does not error - but result in length of zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119771 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 commit r16-764-gfba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 Author: Robert Dubner Date: Tu

[Bug cobol/119790] FE (parser): CONSTANT AS figurative-constant broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119790 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 commit r16-764-gfba34a0cc55488ad89becf81cf2c9ac517d244d4 Author: Robert Dubner Date: Tu

[Bug cobol/119337] cobol: gcobc wrapper should deduce output name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/120368] [16 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-forward-propagate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120368 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/120368] New: [16 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-forward-propagate

r16-761-gd44beb132850a8-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-riscv64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 16.0.0 20250520 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/120366] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is sometimes an array of unknown bound inside double template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120366 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/120297] [15/16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120297 --- Comment #3 from Edwin Lu --- Created attachment 61478 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61478&action=edit user-config-O2-lto.s Here's the assembly with -O2

[Bug target/120297] [15/16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120297 --- Comment #2 from Edwin Lu --- Created attachment 61477 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61477&action=edit user-config-O3-lto.s Here's the assembly file with -O3

[Bug cobol/119883] codegen: recursive user-defined functions don't run recursive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119883 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from Robert Dubn

[Bug fortran/120099] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 FAILs since r16-372-g064cac730f88dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120099 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug cobol/119885] libgcobol: SQRT wrong argument check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119885 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Bug 85316 depends on bug 95801, which changed state. Bug 95801 Summary: Optimiser does not exploit the fact that an integer divisor cannot be zero https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95801 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/95801] Optimiser does not exploit the fact that an integer divisor cannot be zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95801 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/119712] [14 Regression] compiler hang at -O{1,2,3,s} since r14-5109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119712 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119885] libgcobol: SQRT wrong argument check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119885 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d44beb132850a8ced1b0614e2724f18465b4a737 commit r16-761-gd44beb132850a8ced1b0614e2724f18465b4a737 Author: Robert Dubner Date: Tu

[Bug libstdc++/120367] [15/16 Regression] C++23 ranges::transform | ranges::to exception catching (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120367 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 #1 0x7788b9b3 in __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=) at pthread_kill.c:78 #2

[Bug libstdc++/120367] [15/16 Regression] C++23 ranges::transform | ranges::to exception catching (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2 Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/120367] New: C++23 ranges::transform | ranges::to exception catching (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120367 Bug ID: 120367 Summary: C++23 ranges::transform | ranges::to exception catching (segfault) Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/89550] [8/9/10 Regression] Spurious array-bounds warning when using __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ as a string_view

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89550 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.5 |9.0

[Bug target/120360] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120360 --- Comment #3 from Linus Torvalds --- (In reply to Linus Torvalds from comment #2) > > Stupid test-case: Actually, that was a bit *too* stupid, since it doesn't show the effect of "we still need the original value afterwards". So change it to

[Bug c++/120366] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is sometimes an array of unknown bound inside double template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120366 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.5.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/120360] Horrible code generation for trivial decrement with test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120360 --- Comment #2 from Linus Torvalds --- Btw, for a similar - but different - comparison optimization failure case, we had a discussion about our error pointer comparisons in the kernel. We have this model where we return a pointer or error code

[Bug c++/120366] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is sometimes an array of unknown bound inside double template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120366 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is |__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is

[Bug ipa/120295] [15/16 Regression] Wrong code on -O3 for trunk version (live code is wrongly eliminated) since r15-6294-g96fb71883d438b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120295 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a fix on the mailing list: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6h61fwbp5@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u

[Bug cobol/119883] codegen: recursive user-defined functions don't run recursive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119883 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/111873] [12/13/14/15 regression] runtime Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre' since r12-434-g93f8cb4965cebe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1db46f7e51d4a546ca536f7f10e548f02e5cc12 commit r15-9717-gc1db46f7e51d4a546ca536f7f10e548f02e5cc12 Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/120366] New: __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is sometimes an array of unknown bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120366 Bug ID: 120366 Summary: __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is sometimes an array of unknown bound Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug testsuite/120365] New: Flag/skip torture testing in presence of explicit '-O'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120365 Bug ID: 120365 Summary: Flag/skip torture testing in presence of explicit '-O' Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: internal-improvement Severity: en

[Bug c++/120362] [GCC-15.1] Illegal Insn when run spec2017 511 ref size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120362 --- Comment #13 from Li Pan --- Spec has two sentences about this: [1] These instructions are intended to be used to save and restore vector registers when the type or length of the current contents of the vector register is not known, or where

[Bug c++/120362] [GCC-15.1] Illegal Insn when run spec2017 511 ref size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120362 Kito Cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew at sifive dot com --- Comment #12 f

[Bug ipa/110282] [12/13/14/15 regression] Segmentation fault with specific optimizations since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282 --- Comment #23 from Sam James --- Thanks Martin.

[Bug ipa/110282] [12/13/14/15 regression] Segmentation fault with specific optimizations since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/99912] Unnecessary / inefficient spilling of AVX2 ymm registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99912 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/119835] GCN, nvptx offloading: 'libgomp.c++/pr106445-1.C' with '-fno-inline': ICE 'during GIMPLE pass: nrv'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119835 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug c++/120362] [GCC-15.1] Illegal Insn when run spec2017 511 ref size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120362 --- Comment #11 from Robin Dapp --- > Yes. I am sure. And SPIKE and QEMU have no problem. So vlre/vsre should execute despite a VILL in VTYPE? At first sight I don't find any specifics in the vector spec. qemu is not very pedantic in that res

[Bug c++/120362] [GCC-15.1] Illegal Insn when run spec2017 511 ref size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120362 Kito Cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug c++/120363] internal compiler error: in tree_node, at cp/module.cc:9956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120363 --- Comment #1 from ACB --- Created attachment 61476 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61476&action=edit freport-bug

  1   2   >