https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70782
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Josh Haberman from comment #1)
> I just realized that the union has nothing to do with it. I get exactly the
> same results if the function returns a long:
Note the version in comment #1 is alr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36602
Component|rtl-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119826
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119863
--- Comment #3 from Nathaniel Shead ---
FWIW, in the meantime a workaround is to do
// ...
template
class U
{
template
friend class ::T;
};
// ...
instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67797
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681484.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85697
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119874
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-20
Assignee|ibuclaw at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119817
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c91f94bbb09c5380c3cc07c4c8fabab332eb962
commit r13-9553-g3c91f94bbb09c5380c3cc07c4c8fabab332eb962
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119826
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f12448fcbc25c0459b477cb6c1cef7012849346
commit r13-9554-g9f12448fcbc25c0459b477cb6c1cef7012849346
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118309
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:849dcb45c5a79fa29c3cf706c987157deea4ac9d
commit r13-9552-g849dcb45c5a79fa29c3cf706c987157deea4ac9d
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82991
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||67797
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119641
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119826
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88b3c896602036b61005501981b6f4a4deca59b0
commit r14-11667-g88b3c896602036b61005501981b6f4a4deca59b0
Author: Iain Buclaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119817
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1b7ee4879aca90c9828b6b9f4937ed15513adfa
commit r14-11666-gd1b7ee4879aca90c9828b6b9f4937ed15513adfa
Author: Iain Buclaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118309
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aec3b99d3dee8a35adabb23c7835dfbd41e45520
commit r14-11665-gaec3b99d3dee8a35adabb23c7835dfbd41e45520
Author: Iain Buclaw
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119874
Bug ID: 119874
Summary: d: Recognize user-defined prototypes of built-in
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #34 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Thanks Andrew for the reply. In that case, the issue is probably invalid
because checkpoint4.cpp also has several reinterpret_casts casting to things
involving templates. Too bad, LLVM's -fsanitize=un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
Yup:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-April/844452.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #33 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to mcccs from comment #31)
> Created attachment 61160 [details]
> minimized.cpp
>
> GCC -O1 -fstrict-aliasing or -O2 or -O3: aborts
>
> I've attached the minimized human-readable reduced file. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #32 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Oh no I'm so sorry all! I tried to set the previous attachment obsolete
unfortunately it quoted all of it and posted here! Sorry for the tall thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #31 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Created attachment 61160
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61160&action=edit
minimized.cpp
GCC -O1 -fstrict-aliasing or -O2 or -O3: aborts
I've attached the minimized human-readab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61145|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #156 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61159&action=edit
Preprocessed source
Adding the preprocessed source just in case the other site goes down for some
reason.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28306
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
--- Comment #6 from Denis Chertykov ---
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681478.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79d2c3089f480738613b7d338d86d8be710f8158
commit r16-42-g79d2c3089f480738613b7d338d86d8be710f8158
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a64b224fa014e772fb30f6bd69ceb24da5827e6
commit r16-41-g1a64b224fa014e772fb30f6bd69ceb24da5827e6
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Apr 19 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118410
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:874f4c164749f1ed5b60ddf1d4533c8f4ba627a1
commit r16-40-g874f4c164749f1ed5b60ddf1d4533c8f4ba627a1
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Apr 19 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31889
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119862
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-29 00:00:00 |2025-4-19
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119491
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119491
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119873
Bug ID: 119873
Summary: s390x musttail call failure on s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
--- Comment #5 from Denis Chertykov ---
The patch is simple.
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
index 7dbc7fe1e00..6c86e4f8f6c 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
@@ -5883,8 +5883,8 @@ stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43233
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
That is take:
```
int g1,g2,g3;
int f2(int a, int b)
{
a &= 1;
if (b)
g3++;
if (a) return g1;
return g2;
}
int f2_(int a, int b)
{
if (b)
g3++;
a &= 1;
if (a) retur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87900
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681476.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #440 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
The branch for GCC 16 has opened now, so I assume it would be a good time to
rebase the patches so I can re-test them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111949
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111949
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0939abea33ce9d9eb9328f80aace8109c096760c
commit r16-37-g0939abea33ce9d9eb9328f80aace8109c096760c
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118257
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05c4e3ecb54d22836ba2ae0ec1efedf8b78d7522
commit r16-36-g05c4e3ecb54d22836ba2ae0ec1efedf8b78d7522
Author: Jiaxun Yang
Date: Sat Apr 19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111814
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a643f55f5acc05dcc7cee133647bf3193d5b563
commit r16-35-g2a643f55f5acc05dcc7cee133647bf3193d5b563
Author: Jiaxun Yang
Date: Sat Apr 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It's not in gcc-15 as far as I know. I would much rather sit down and
understand the failure rather than revert, even if it was in gcc-15.
The original code was plain wrong and the failure below strongly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #3)
> At this point lots of code relies on that working.
I think it was never intentionally supported in constexpr (it just happened to
work) and so such code was ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #20 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #19)
> However, the i++ is not completely useless, as this is a way to tell the
> compiler that the number of iterations is bounded by INT_MAX
I wouldn't say that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119864
--- Comment #2 from Pilar Latiesa ---
It seems that as is failing because of a duplicate symbol.
This is the content of m.s generated with -save-temps:
.file "m.cpp"
.text
.globl _ZGIW1m
.type _ZGIW1m, @fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119864
Pilar Latiesa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.2.0
Summary|[modules] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119872
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
-fno-ivopts works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119872
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection, wrong-code
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119872
Bug ID: 119872
Summary: [15 regression] wrong code at -O{1,2,s}
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
56 matches
Mail list logo