https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116125
--- Comment #10 from Kito Cheng ---
ping, does it possible to back port to release branches? it seems land on trunk
for a while :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119722
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 116093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116093
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116093
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45a708d7bf8369930f4f770bbb7047941727ba41
commit r15-9513-g45a708d7bf8369930f4f770bbb7047941727ba41
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch ---
looks like the error comes from name resolution and is also reproducible with a
much more simple
Program-id. NofBug.
Data division.
Working-storage section.
01 billTo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #40 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61131
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61131&action=edit
p.ii.xz
Reduction is pretty slow, but:
```
$ g++ p.ii -w -flto=auto -O3 -shared
p.ii: In function ‘MpRepeatedStri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119829
Bug ID: 119829
Summary: Internal Compiler Error with braced initialization and
designated initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
No problem -- you may want to do -Werror=return-type -Werror=uninitialized
-Werror=sequence-point as well to reduce the chance of reducing to something
bogus. (-Werror=return-type would catch that issue I menti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #12 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Thanks Sam, I'm restarting reduction this time checking if it compiles with
trunk GCC as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to mcccs from comment #10)
Using the return value of e() when it didn't return anything is undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #10 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Bad commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ff6686d2e5f797d6c6a36ad14a7084bc1dc350e4
Minimal testcase:
int a[];
short b, c;
long d;
__attribute__((noipa)) long(e)() {}
static int f(in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118601
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56b3858b6a1118d2e27e3047d5ee52faec7aac83
commit r14-11620-g56b3858b6a1118d2e27e3047d5ee52faec7aac83
Author: Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118182
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7b1aeea684a8191d1503b4022cea8d0d218ca65
commit r14-11619-gb7b1aeea684a8191d1503b4022cea8d0d218ca65
Author: Alexandre O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||konstantin.vladimirov@gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119828
Bug ID: 119828
Summary: RISC-V gcc rv64gc fails to optimize away stack frame
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64534
--- Comment #6 from Phong Nguyen ---
Ah, sorry, I was directed here to take a look at:
`gcc -march=native -march=westmere`
I observed that on GCC 8 the usual expectation of "last flag wins" was not
true, but that it appears to do the right thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628
--- Comment #14 from Ken Jin ---
No speedup (within noise) with latest patch over previous patch. So Andrew
might be right there on the register shuffling.
However, note that pystones is just one benchmark in Python and not the
full benchmark su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #39 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #38)
> The testcase from comment 14 fails for me still with Martin's last patch as
> well as Honza's.
I'm reducing two variants of that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64534
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Phong Nguyen from comment #4)
> I've been able to replicate this on GCC 8.5.0 but it looks like GCC 9.2.1,
> 10.3.1, 11.2.1, 12.2.1, 13.3.1 and 14.2.1 are showing expected behavior.
Huh? `gcc -m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64534
Phong Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p.nguyen at yahooinc dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #38 from Sam James ---
The testcase from comment 14 fails for me still with Martin's last patch as
well as Honza's.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119786
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61129
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61129&action=edit
pr119786.patch
This patch together with the PR119785 fix survives bootstrap-ubsan with
UBSAN_OPTIONS set to catch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119785
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Hopefully fixed on the trunk so far.
Yes, fixed, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116093
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Based on my analysis in comment #1 makes this sound similar to the problem that
is being fixed by r15-9397-g3f9dfb94eab1ab1bbf9a2b5e20d1f61e36516063 .
Notice _5 = _2; there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116093
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Known to fail|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119712
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amacleod at redhat dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119784
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew ---
(* gm2 exampleadd2.mod -o exampleadd2 -masm=intel *)
MODULE exampleadd2 ;
FROM libc IMPORT printf, exit ;
PROCEDURE Example (foo, bar: LONGCARD) : CARDINAL ;
VAR
myout: LONGCARD ;
BEGIN
ASM VOLATIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew ---
Even "better"... :(
I'm seriously afraid it won't be possible to switch somehow to GAS, regarding
assembly, instead of C-inline?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119712
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod ---
Bah. almost but not quite.
Rangers cache algorithm must remain as it is... it will always produce a better
result.. but we need to calculate everything properly.
Going back to the original analysis:
FWD v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119826
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5ffab99a5a962aa955310e74ca0a4be5c1acf30
commit r15-9509-gc5ffab99a5a962aa955310e74ca0a4be5c1acf30
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
Bug ID: 119827
Summary: Out of bounds check fails on substrings for upper
bound
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119826
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119764
--- Comment #1 from Nathaniel Shead ---
The thread at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680971.html
has a patch. Note that there are potential ABI concerns as this changes the
size and contents of the lambdas.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 119755, which changed state.
Bug 119755 Summary: type_traits:828:11: fatal error: failed to load pendings
for 'std::__is_one_of'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119755
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119755
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#index-masm_003ddialect-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119755
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6f4178d0d5a51c0de175d282f693f923ffefa27
commit r15-9508-ga6f4178d0d5a51c0de175d282f693f923ffefa27
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew ---
I modified somewhat the example and it seems to be working using RAX too (BTW:
does there exist any way — any „pragma” or anything — to switch from that
atrocious AT&T syntax to Intel syntax?):
MODULE examplead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113546
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51ff9919c458987c0ca7131291b81dfd03cabe0a
commit r13-9530-g51ff9919c458987c0ca7131291b81dfd03cabe0a
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Full backtrace:
```
$ gcobol xml.cbl
cobol1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x5e9b1e071134 internal_error(char const*, ...)
/usr/src/debug/sys-devel/gcc-15.0./gcc-15.0./gcc/diagnosti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.3.1
Summary|[12/13 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118476
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1eb3fdac1af2a124781047bc562ec0e4d809f0d
commit r13-9532-gd1eb3fdac1af2a124781047bc562ec0e4d809f0d
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116412
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de622c307743cc03f45f1ba7b0c2f8df0b378206
commit r13-9531-gde622c307743cc03f45f1ba7b0c2f8df0b378206
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119826
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Summary|ICE: verify_type fa
ffb97bf2a7ba924ed3af9c) 15.0.1 20250415 (experimental)
5621b3b5c9ebd98f1f18787a6fceb015d19d33a5
Copyright (C) 2025 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
```
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119816
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #8 from Sam James -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119816
rudi at heitbaum dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119717
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119717
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119717
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:727f330f9ac661339af1121fc5c9b67dd0d35872
commit r15-9505-g727f330f9ac661339af1121fc5c9b67dd0d35872
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon Apr 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
Bug ID: 119825
Summary: gcobol XML generate forces bug report
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: cobol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #37 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 61128
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61128&action=edit
updated patch (regtests and bootstraps)
Updated patch. Streaming summaries seems to work and fixes the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.2.1
Summary|[13/14 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko at hexco dot de
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119824
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Even simplier is rejected:
```
extern unsigned t;
auto t = 1u;
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||cwg1347
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113546
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f6285f2918f1835ec7c35c37cbec8c10a091b57
commit r14-11617-g5f6285f2918f1835ec7c35c37cbec8c10a091b57
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119824
Bug ID: 119824
Summary: initialization of a static member variable with type
auto or decltype(auto) is not accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119784
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ed2fa4768f3d318b8ace5bd4a095596e06fad7b
commit r15-9503-g5ed2fa4768f3d318b8ace5bd4a095596e06fad7b
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Apr 14 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91aab4dd6814ca54c211a93fec3f072745a52c4
commit r15-9502-gd91aab4dd6814ca54c211a93fec3f072745a52c4
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:628aecb050bbbc4bb0bd4468c474623e20d64e21
commit r15-9501-g628aecb050bbbc4bb0bd4468c474623e20d64e21
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
--- Comment #3 from M Welinder ---
Thanks. Confirmed working.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #36 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 61127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61127&action=edit
patch (untested)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119823
Bug ID: 119823
Summary: -Q --help=optimizers output is misleading for -O0 +
inconsistent docs in the manual
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Sorry it is documented here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.2.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/using.html#manual.intro.using.flags
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #11)
> Created attachment 61123 [details]
> fix
>
> This seems like an appropriate fix, can someone test it on an affected
> target?
A spot-check on x86_64 darwin21 s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk, backports to follow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cf6b52d04df22726d88eef113211b3cc08515de
commit r15-9499-g9cf6b52d04df22726d88eef113211b3cc08515de
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119822
Bug ID: 119822
Summary: Linker failure with std::stacktrace
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211
Bug 119211 depends on bug 119302, which changed state.
Bug 119302 Summary: cobol.3 manpage is installed without program_transform_name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:248e228fecdfb68833481eff8c3c0c7aa9703a8d
commit r15-9497-g248e228fecdfb68833481eff8c3c0c7aa9703a8d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew ---
I mean: the arith limit doesn't bother me that much — 32-bit is quite enough —
but being limited to 32-bit registers while working in 64-bit OS means PUSH/POP
cannot be used, and all these new, additional R* regi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #35 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #33)
> The patch from comment #32 passes LTO-bootstrap and profiled-LTO-bootstrap
> on x86_64-linux. I have asked Honza to look at it and comment, especially
> on the de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
--- Comment #9 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Sorry never mind I understand, it should still be bisected and reduced so that
any hidden bugs would be uncovered. I'll bisect it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119779
Zbigniew changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbigniew2011 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119298
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2011ab13de3e70774f869b356f5f9c750780b34
commit r15-9495-ge2011ab13de3e70774f869b356f5f9c750780b34
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119533
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #34 from Jan Hubicka ---
I there is only problem that ipa_return_value_sum value sum does not survive
from compile time to WPA then we only need to add streaming code for it. This
should be straightforward and there is no need to add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119821
Bug ID: 119821
Summary: FE (parser): CONFIGURATION SECTION rejects valid code
- empty paragraphs
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119820
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
An example I can think of could be:
struct I {
using difference_type = int;
using value_type = char;
value_type operator*() const;
I& operator++();
I operator++(int);
I& operator--();
I operator--(int);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119820
Bug ID: 119820
Summary: Formatting ranges make a subrange via ranges::subrange
(__first, __first + __n)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Ken Jin from comment #9)
> I tried this out with CPython's interpreter that uses tail calls with the
> patch at
> https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/hjl/saved/master?ref_type=heads
> applied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119533
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vineet Gupta :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edb4867412895100b3addc525bc0dba0ea90c7f9
commit r15-9492-gedb4867412895100b3addc525bc0dba0ea90c7f9
Author: Vineet Gupta
Date: Tu
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
