https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614

--- Comment #35 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #33)
> The patch from comment #32 passes LTO-bootstrap and profiled-LTO-bootstrap
> on x86_64-linux.  I have asked Honza to look at it and comment, especially
> on the decision to put the return VR into clone_info despite that these
> often do not describe a clone.

So far, it survives testing with a lot of packages (not completed a set though)
with no issues. I'll switch to Honza's patch when it is available. Thanks.

Reply via email to