https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #35 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #33) > The patch from comment #32 passes LTO-bootstrap and profiled-LTO-bootstrap > on x86_64-linux. I have asked Honza to look at it and comment, especially > on the decision to put the return VR into clone_info despite that these > often do not describe a clone. So far, it survives testing with a lot of packages (not completed a set though) with no issues. I'll switch to Honza's patch when it is available. Thanks.