[Bug c/119585] counted_by in redefined structs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119585 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/119408] LoongArch: Q Suffix for __float128 Literals Not Supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408 --- Comment #14 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to chenglulu from comment #13) > There is a problem now. When gcc supports both _Float128 and Q suffixes, the > libquadmath library will be automatically linked when the fortran program is > compiled

[Bug target/119408] LoongArch: Q Suffix for __float128 Literals Not Supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408 --- Comment #13 from chenglulu --- There is a problem now. When gcc supports both _Float128 and Q suffixes, the libquadmath library will be automatically linked when the fortran program is compiled using gfortran compiled with this version of gc

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, ak at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 > > ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed |A

[Bug c/119585] New: counted_by in redefined structs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119585 Bug ID: 119585 Summary: counted_by in redefined structs. Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Ass

[Bug target/119583] -fomit-frame-pointer does not work as expected for -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added Target|X86_64 |x86-64 --- Comment #1 from Siddhes

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andi Kleen : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:063fbd5a10d47d4957d605ca917480d02e054249 commit r15-9143-g063fbd5a10d47d4957d605ca917480d02e054249 Author: Andi Kleen Date: Tue Apr

[Bug ipa/103819] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in redirect_callee, at cgraph.c:1389 with __attribute__((flatten)), comdat and aliases and -O2 since r11-7940-ge7fd3b783238d034

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- So what is happening is we have an alias for the comdat function that will cause the ICE and also at the same time we remove calls to another comdat function because we prove it is not called and then we ca

[Bug c++/119584] [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/119308] Cobol ICE on "hello world" on POWER in rs6000_output_function_epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- So some AIX documentation specifies a language tag value (7) for Cobol in the traceback table: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/aix/7.1?topic=ops-tbtag-pseudo-op ...so this fixes the ICE: diff --git a/gcc/co

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 Bug 119482 depends on bug 119584, which changed state. Bug 119584 Summary: [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 119584, which changed state. Bug 119584 Summary: [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584

[Bug ipa/103819] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in redirect_callee, at cgraph.c:1389 with __attribute__((flatten)) and -O2 since r11-7940-ge7fd3b783238d034

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/119584] [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The concept causes the function to be in the comdat of the base function rather than just the function itself. That is: Same comdat group as: _Z1dIPiEvT_/7 References: Referring: _Z1dIPiEvT_/7 (ali

[Bug target/119581] Failure to use vector vandn instruction on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Thanks Pan. I've got an intern working in this space, and this may be a good exercise for them. So definitely reach out before you dive in to see if she's gotten to this issue yet.

[Bug c++/119584] New: [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584 Bug ID: 119584 Summary: [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 15.0

[Bug c++/119584] [14/15 Regression] flatten attribute calling a function with concept requires an ICE during inlining at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119584 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.3 Keywords|

[Bug target/119581] Failure to use vector vandn instruction on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581 --- Comment #3 from Li Pan --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #2) > Thanks Pan. I've got an intern working in this space, and this may be a > good exercise for them. So definitely reach out before you dive in to see > if she's gotten

[Bug target/119308] Cobol ICE on "hello world" on POWER in rs6000_output_function_epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308 --- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5) > bergner@kubota:COBOL$ ./a.out > Hello, world! > Segmentation fault (core dumped) The return address at the beginning of main ends up not being the address we e

[Bug target/119372] [12/13/14 Regression] Aarch64: Compiling with -march=armv8-a+pauth -mbranch-protection=standard produces autiasp and retaa in the function epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/118982] Documentation for constructor and init_priority should be referencing each other

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118982 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/118982] Documentation for constructor and init_priority should be referencing each other

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118982 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12533c0c8b27dcbb1b83517bf4eb09faa98bf814 commit r15-9142-g12533c0c8b27dcbb1b83517bf4eb09faa98bf814 Author: Sandra Loosemore Dat

[Bug target/119583] -fomit-frame-pointer does not work as expected for -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/119581] Failure to use vector vandn instruction on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #1 from L

[Bug rtl-optimization/119583] New: -fomit-frame-pointer does not work as expected for -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119583 Bug ID: 119583 Summary: -fomit-frame-pointer does not work as expected for -mavx Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/119308] Cobol ICE on "hello world" on POWER in rs6000_output_function_epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/119308] Cobol ICE on "hello world" on POWER in rs6000_output_function_epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- I've recreated it too. I'll have someone on my team have a look.

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- (In reply to ak from comment #9) > For the ICE i'm not sure why i'm not seeing it. The input file should have > had flatten enabled. > gcc_checking_assert (to->calls_comdat_local); --enable-checking=rel

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 --- Comment #9 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- For the ICE i'm not sure why i'm not seeing it. The input file should have had flatten enabled.

[Bug bootstrap/119560] cc1 posix_spawnp compilation error with gcc 14.2.0 on Ubuntu 24.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119560 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/119566] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.cc:25410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-02 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug sanitizer/119582] New: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18708 with -fsanitize=pointer-subtract

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119582 Bug ID: 119582 Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18708 with -fsanitize=pointer-subtract Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/119566] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.cc:25410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60955&action=edit Reduced testcase

[Bug c/119582] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18708 with -fsanitize=pointer-subtract

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|sanitizer |c --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --

[Bug sanitizer/119582] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18708 with -fsanitize=pointer-subtract

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/119580] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args, at cp/pt.cc:9595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119580 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/118118] _Bool extension for C89 is undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118118 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/119581] New: Failure to use vector vandn instruction on RISC-V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119581 Bug ID: 119581 Summary: Failure to use vector vandn instruction on RISC-V Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c/118118] _Bool extension for C89 is undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118118 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c708fa411fa708e7abc717b0880d6f708967a37 commit r15-9140-g4c708fa411fa708e7abc717b0880d6f708967a37 Author: Sandra Loosemore Dat

[Bug bootstrap/119560] cc1 posix_spawnp compilation error with gcc 14.2.0 on Ubuntu 24.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119560 --- Comment #3 from Scott Smedley --- H, I rebuilt from scratch to give you the full build.log but it worked this time! I build it a 3rd time and it worked too, so I can't reproduce the error. Sorry for the kerfuffle.

[Bug c++/119387] [14/15 Regression] Regression in performance by a factor of 6 when building with debugging symbols since r14-5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119387 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug ada/119571] [15 Regression] ggc-none.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used w hen making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0 commit r15-9139-g358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: W

[Bug ada/119571] [15 Regression] ggc-none.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used w hen making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/119440] --enable-host-pie fails to link (stage1) gnatbind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119440 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0 commit r15-9139-g358f7a954584ccefeef41390852d002c60ec11c0 Author: Eric Botcazou Date:

[Bug c++/119580] New: ICE: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args, at cp/pt.cc:9595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119580 Bug ID: 119580 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args, at cp/pt.cc:9595 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/111499] [12/1/14/15 Regression] -Wstringop-overread warning in std::vector less operator< for __builtin_memcmp call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/119571] [15 Regression] ggc-none.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used w hen making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/117063] [13/14/15 Regression] Incorrect stringop-overread warning using std::vector::insert at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117063 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to fail|

[Bug ada/119571] [15 Regression] ggc-none.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used w hen making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119571 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/119478] structure constructor is using the wrong stride

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119478 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com -

[Bug fortran/119579] Derived type not initialized correctly with array sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119579 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status

[Bug tree-optimization/113239] [13/14 regression] After r13-6372-g822a11a1e642e0, bogus -Warray-bounds warnings in std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113239 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.3.0, 14.2.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/119579] New: Derived type not initialized correctly with array sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119579 Bug ID: 119579 Summary: Derived type not initialized correctly with array sections Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/111374] Spurious -Warray-bounds warning when building std::vector (or libstdc++ bug?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111374 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/119386] [14/15 Regression][x64] Shared libraries can no longer be compiled with profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386 --- Comment #54 from Alexander Monakov --- I think the x86_64 behavior is simply copied as-is from i386. On i386, there was a time when Glibc wouldn't preserve eax+ecx+edx in the PLT trampoline, but preserving those became necessary when GCC ex

[Bug c++/119551] [modules] ICE when reading inline var referencing TU-local entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0210bedf481a9fd248ce29650b824bcd84c3723c commit r15-9136-g0210bedf481a9fd248ce29650b824bcd84c3723c Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/119566] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.cc:25410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119566 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||c++-lambda --- Comment #4 from Andrew P

[Bug c++/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 --- Comment #2 from pavol at rusnak dot io --- Created attachment 60954 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60954&action=edit preprocessed input (zipped)

[Bug c/117689] enum with underying type "extension" to GNU 17 is not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/118892] [14 Regression] ICE (segfault) in rebuild_jump_labels on aarch64-linux-gnu since r14-5289

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavol at rusnak dot io --- Comment #16

[Bug target/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code See Also|

[Bug target/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Target|

[Bug c/117689] enum with underying type "extension" to GNU 17 is not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42b2fc3fc9c06c174ec4d2c0566f54b624bc70b5 commit r15-9137-g42b2fc3fc9c06c174ec4d2c0566f54b624bc70b5 Author: Sandra Loosemore Dat

[Bug c++/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- Reducing.

[Bug c/117689] enum with underying type "extension" to GNU 17 is not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm, the code in finish_decl() in c-decl.cc seems to be deliberately deferring the error diagnostic for an incomplete types on certain static decls. From a user's perspective, I think it's bette

[Bug c++/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 --- Comment #3 from pavol at rusnak dot io --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/. We need preprocessed sources for > Activation.cpp. attached > (I think we also have a dupe of this, but I don't know

[Bug c++/119578] internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/119551] [modules] ICE when reading inline var referencing TU-local entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 119551, which changed state. Bug 119551 Summary: [modules] ICE when reading inline var referencing TU-local entity https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119551 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/119578] New: internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119578 Bug ID: 119578 Summary: internal compiler error when building torch-2.6.0 on aarch64-linux Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 --- Comment #8 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- The workload does a lot of bitmap manipulations: # 5.62% cc1plus cc1plus [.] bitmap_and_into(bitmap_head*, bitmap_head const*) 5.30% cc1plus cc1plus [.] bitm

[Bug tree-optimization/111415] [12/13/14 Regression] False positive array-bounds warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111415 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.5.0, 15.0 Summary|False

[Bug fortran/119540] [15 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119540 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60936|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > The Linux kernel is some what a special case and somewhat should be using > `--param min-pagesize=0` to avoid the warnings about low fixed addresses. That is f

[Bug target/119572] [15 Regression] Recent change triggers regression on RISC-V vector test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119572 Robin Dapp changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp --- (In

[Bug middle-end/119577] New: RISC-V: Redundant vector IV roundtrip.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119577 Bug ID: 119577 Summary: RISC-V: Redundant vector IV roundtrip. Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #8 from Arthur O'Dwyer --- The Linux kernel disables -Warray-bounds in GCC 9 and later (and -Wstringop-overflow unconditionally). https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel/blame/5be5ecdaf1e7fb1a04e6122771b432851cd2393d/init/Kconfig#L905-L92

[Bug c++/116841] [14 Regression] spurious -Warray-bounds=1 warning when resizing + memcpy-ing into vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116841 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/119386] [14/15 Regression][x64] Shared libraries can no longer be compiled with profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386 --- Comment #53 from Ard Biesheuvel --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #51) > Michael, can you give your ack/nack for Ard's proposal in comment #24 (the > second variant, I guess keying off -m[no-]direct-extern-access doesn't make >

[Bug fortran/119540] [15 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/reduce_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119540 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > > I might be missing to set some elem_len or span or ... > > Testcase: Running the program (compiled with: -Og -g -f

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #8) > The Linux kernel disables -Warray-bounds in GCC 9 and later (and > -Wstringop-overflow unconditionally). > https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel/blame/ > 5be5ecdaf

[Bug tree-optimization/114945] [14 regression] Sporadic std::vector::resize() -Wstringop-overflow or -Warray-bounds warning with gcc 14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114945 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 regression] Sporadic |[14 regression] Sporadic

[Bug c++/116841] [14 Regression] spurious -Warray-bounds=1 warning when resizing + memcpy-ing into vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116841 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #6) > Will Wray points out that GCC's own codebase disables `-Warray-bounds` in > several places, including at least these places in current master: > > gcc/cp/modul

[Bug tree-optimization/114945] [14/15 regression] Sporadic std::vector::resize() -Wstringop-overflow or -Warray-bounds warning with gcc 14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114945 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:844eed3364309bd20cbb7d6793a16b7c6b889ba4 commit r15-9134-g844eed3364309bd20cbb7d6793a16b7c6b889ba4 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/116841] [14 Regression] spurious -Warray-bounds=1 warning when resizing + memcpy-ing into vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116841 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes it was fixed by Honza's r15-5361-gaac5c57ee16723 Add __builtion_unreachable to vector::size(), vector::capacity() This patch makes it clear that vector sizes and capacities are not negat

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #6 from Arthur O'Dwyer --- Will Wray points out that GCC's own codebase disables `-Warray-bounds` in several places, including at least these places in current master: gcc/cp/module.cc:#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Warray-bounds"

[Bug tree-optimization/108860] [12/13/14 regression] New (since gcc 12) false positive null-dereference in vector.resize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108860 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 regression] New |[12/13/14 regression] New

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/119383] [14/15 Regression] Boost 1.85 lib test failures after commit r15-8011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|15.0|14.3 Summary|[15 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- What about removing -Wuninitialized too since that has just as many false positives and has been included in -Wall even longer, at least 25 years now.

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 --- Comment #14 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- >to do this for entry_size < G.pagesize * GGC_QUIRE_SIZE, this should >avoid fragmenting the virtual address space. Possibly do this only >for USING_MADVISE, not sure. Okay let me test that.

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- -Warray-bounds has been included in -Wall since before GCC 4.8.0 which is 12 years ago I think it might be too late to reconsider this. Plus -Warray-bounds false positives are not as well spread as yo

[Bug middle-end/119576] Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/119567] "unknown operator" in pointer subtraction diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119567 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug driver/119576] New: Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119576 Bug ID: 119576 Summary: Please remove -Warray-bounds from -Wall Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: drive

[Bug c++/119383] [15 Regression] Boost 1.85 lib test failures after commit r15-8011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42a4f863956c0bf18b97738da475bdb9c14504b2 commit r14-11498-g42a4f863956c0bf18b97738da475bdb9c14504b2 Author: Marek Polacek

  1   2   3   >