[Bug c++/119512] -Wuninitialized does not diagnose use of uninitialized member in constructor initialization list due to order of init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119512 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60914 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60914&action=edit uninclude but reduced This does warn at `-O2 -W -Wall` but it should warn from the front-end due to the order

[Bug c++/119512] -Wuninitialized does not diagnose use of uninitialized member in constructor initialization list due to order of init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119512 --- Comment #3 from Peter Damianov --- Created attachment 60913 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60913&action=edit Original unreduced testcase (I reduced this badly in the bug report - this doesn't diagnose at any optimizati

[Bug c++/119512] -Wuninitialized does not diagnose use of uninitialized member in constructor initialization list due to order of init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119512 --- Comment #2 from Peter Damianov --- Andrew is correct that I reduced it too much, and replacing the attempt at providing deque with #include does diagnose it. But the original source I reduced it out of doesn't diagnose at any optimization

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 --- Comment #10 from Andi Kleen --- It doesn't really help for the PR119387 test case, perhaps not surprising because it optimizes freeing not allocation: Summary ./gcc/cc1plus-opt -w -std=c++20 ~/gcc/git/tsrc/119387-formatted.ii -quiet ran

[Bug tree-optimization/119492] missing tail call due to address of the argument taken but NOT escaping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119492 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/119492] missing tail call due to address of the argument taken but NOT escaping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119492 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > So looking into this further, I think PR 15387 got fixed correctly via PR > > 49519 (and PR51323 and PR 50074).

[Bug tree-optimization/119492] missing tail call due to address of the argument taken but NOT escaping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119492 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > So looking into this further, I think PR 15387 got fixed correctly via PR > 49519 (and PR51323 and PR 50074). Note both mention not doing TER into the call to

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60907|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/19616] missed tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0

[Bug cobol/119521] gcc-cobol generated programs with memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119521 --- Comment #2 from Robert Dubner --- Additional: The leaking memory is because exception checking is turned on. Still looking...

[Bug c++/119525] New: ICE when using template alias parameter deduction on alias for std::variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119525 Bug ID: 119525 Summary: ICE when using template alias parameter deduction on alias for std::variant Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug middle-end/118965] [OpenMP] require at least one target/targetsync with append_args' interop and 'interop's init clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118965 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug tree-optimization/119492] missing tail call due to address of the argument taken but NOT escaping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119492 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > > The PR119376 patch ought to handle this (for musttail only of course, > > otherwise unless we can prove it escape

[Bug tree-optimization/119492] missing tail call due to address of the argument taken but NOT escaping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119492 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > The PR119376 patch ought to handle this (for musttail only of course, > otherwise unless we can prove it escaped but isn't observable by the > potential tail cal

[Bug middle-end/19616] missed tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski --- r0-65335-gead553a1d9f920

[Bug rtl-optimization/15387] [4.0 Regression] Misscompilation in sibcall optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15387 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- r0-59830-g01606a5aebb623

[Bug middle-end/119472] Pointers to distinct live objects compare equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119472 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > So is there a _real_ testcase where, apart from strictly non-conformance, > not coalescing a and b is meaningful? I am not sure.

[Bug target/119479] wrong sign caused by substraction operand swap of two dot product operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119479 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/95781] Missing dead code elimination when a recursive function is inlined.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95781 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/119518] C++ FE violates noipa attribute for nothrow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119518 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- So the original code for this was added with r0-49393-gb2dd096b0c7e5c. If the definition of foo was after the use at the time the GCC would emit the S::~S call (unless you compiled with -funit-at-a-time whic

[Bug c++/119518] C++ FE violates noipa attribute for nothrow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119518 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|C++ FE violates noipa |C++ FE violates noipa

[Bug tree-optimization/100366] [12 Regression] spurious warning - std::vector::clear followed by std::vector::insert(vec.end(), ...) with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manx-bugzilla@problemloesun

[Bug middle-end/119507] only the comdat functions before normal functions get their own gcc_except_table section (unless using -ffunction-sections)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119507 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 60910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60910&action=edit Patch which I am testing

[Bug middle-end/119507] only the comdat functions before normal functions get their own gcc_except_table section (unless using -ffunction-sections)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119507 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Confirmed. > > This has been true since the support for moving comdat gcc_except_table to > their own section in r0-118218-g3e6011cfebedfb (which was first incl

[Bug tree-optimization/109909] vector: Writing 8 bytes into 1 allocated byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109909 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 109175, which changed state. Bug 109175 Summary: error: 'void* __builtin_memset(void*, int, long unsigned int)' writing 4 or more bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=] https

[Bug tree-optimization/109175] error: 'void* __builtin_memset(void*, int, long unsigned int)' writing 4 or more bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/109455] false-positive -Wstringop-overflow warning when using std::vector with UBsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109455 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 109455, which changed state. Bug 109455 Summary: false-positive -Wstringop-overflow warning when using std::vector with UBsan https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109455 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/119507] only the comdat functions before normal functions get their own gcc_except_table section (unless using -ffunction-sections)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119507 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/501f3ca0.3040...@codesourcery.com/

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 109569, which changed state. Bug 109569 Summary: warning: ‘void* __builtin_memmove(void*, const void*, long unsigned int)’ writing 1 or more bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=]

[Bug tree-optimization/109569] warning: ‘void* __builtin_memmove(void*, const void*, long unsigned int)’ writing 1 or more bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109569 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/100366] [12 Regression] spurious warning - std::vector::clear followed by std::vector::insert(vec.end(), ...) with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 100366, which changed state. Bug 100366 Summary: [12 Regression] spurious warning - std::vector::clear followed by std::vector::insert(vec.end(), ...) with -O2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366

[Bug tree-optimization/100366] [12 Regression] spurious warning - std::vector::clear followed by std::vector::insert(vec.end(), ...) with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.5|12.3 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/109717] -Warray-bounds error with gnu++20 and fmt library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109717 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-05-04 00:00:00 |2025-3-29 --- Comment #10 from Jonath

[Bug middle-end/119507] only the comdat functions before normal functions get their own gcc_except_table section (unless using -ffunction-sections)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119507 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 109909, which changed state. Bug 109909 Summary: vector: Writing 8 bytes into 1 allocated byte https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109909 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/110536] [12/13/14 regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning in std::transform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110536 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/119509] Missed optimization for comparison of division equivalent to right shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119509 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Missed optimization on |Missed optimization for

[Bug tree-optimization/111073] [13/14/15 regression] False-positive -Wstringop-overflow when building gdb from trunk with -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111073 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Rogério de Souza Moraes from comment #6) > We got similar issue with a very small code using GCC v14.2: > > https://godbolt.org/z/b5dqvnKqj > > ** > > #include > > voi

[Bug c++/101361] Bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101361 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14) > Comment 0 compiles without warnings since gcc 12.1.0, I'm not sure what > fixed it yet. It stopped warning with r12-4726-g9a27acc30a34b7 Make full us

[Bug tree-optimization/119509] Missed optimization on AArch64 for comparison of division equivalent to right shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119509 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug web/119227] Does the generated HTML for cobol get installed to the website?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119227 --- Comment #18 from David Malcolm --- For reference, some commits that I needed to do when getting the libgdiagnostics docs onto the website: commit g:e6e4cb34e30f25adfb57e998663a8a1796b8573c commit g:168f938b8f2aab5c0443b02404d004ed4298651

[Bug c++/119401] [15 regression] ICE when lambda is used as template argument in member function parameter type since r15-7202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119401 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- We could detect if there was an intervening redeclaration by comparing the source location of the specialization vs that of the prevailing template declaration: diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc inde

[Bug tree-optimization/114379] stringop-overflow warning on C++ code with -O2 (or -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114379 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Denilson Sá Maia from comment #0) > for (auto &queue : queues) { > auto actionQueue = > std::dynamic_pointer_cast(queue); The compiler can't prove th

[Bug cobol/119524] New: cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 Bug ID: 119524 Summary: cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/114945] [14/15 regression] Sporadic std::vector::resize() -Wstringop-overflow or -Warray-bounds warning with gcc 14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114945 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/119521] gcc-cobol generated programs with memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119521 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/97048] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overread warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048 Bug 97048 depends on bug 101361, which changed state. Bug 101361 Summary: Bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with -O3 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101361 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/119523] missing tail call with aggregate returns wrappers with extraction inbetween

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119523 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/119523] New: missing tail call with aggregate returns wrappers with extraction inbetween

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119523 Bug ID: 119523 Summary: missing tail call with aggregate returns wrappers with extraction inbetween Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: mi

[Bug preprocessor/108900] [libcpp] cpp gives wrong line number information with a file huge number of lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9b56c65a2697e0d7a6c0f15f1977803dc94579b commit r15-9018-gd9b56c65a2697e0d7a6c0f15f1977803dc94579b Author: Jeremy Bettis Date: F

[Bug c++/101361] Bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101361 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115074] incorrect stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115074 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 115074, which changed state. Bug 115074 Summary: incorrect stringop-overflow warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115074 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libstdc++/117983] [12/13/14 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive for __builtin_memmove from vector::insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117983 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ryanpiwowarski at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug libstdc++/117983] [12/13/14 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive for __builtin_memmove from vector::insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117983 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:878812b6f6905774ab37cb78903e3e11bf1c508c commit r15-9017-g878812b6f6905774ab37cb78903e3e11bf1c508c Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/117983] [12/13/14 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive for __builtin_memmove from vector::insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117983 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-03-28 Component|c++

[Bug tree-optimization/115201] Recursion not optimized for structs arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/89139] GCC emits code for static functions that aren't used by the optimized code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89139 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yyc1992 at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug modula2/118045] [15 Regression] libm2iso.so.20.0.0 contains an unresolvable reference to symbol casin (and 171 other similar warnings)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118045 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/111123] Warning about "used uninitialized" member shown or hidden randomly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/114758] [13/14/15 Regression] The layout of a std::vector reports a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114758 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4 Summary|The layout of

[Bug tree-optimization/110498] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Spurious warnings stringop-overflow and array-bounds copying data as bytes into vector::reserve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110498 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug tree-optimization/110498] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Spurious warnings stringop-overflow and array-bounds copying data as bytes into vector::reserve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110498 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Spurious warnings |[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 119512, which changed state. Bug 119512 Summary: -Wuninitialized does not diagnose use of uninitialized member in constructor initialization list due to order of init https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119512

[Bug c++/119512] -Wuninitialized does not diagnose use of uninitialized member in constructor initialization list due to order of init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119512 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/64500] push_to_top_level() shows up high during build of modern C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64500 --- Comment #14 from Sam James --- Works for me too! It drops waay down the profile now (several pages). The PR116285 testcase has another problem only on trunk, with the top being: 6.60% cc1plus cc1plus but I mentioned that in PR116285

[Bug libstdc++/119501] std::ranges::copy_n advances InputIterator one more time than necessary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119501 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2471 is still open

[Bug c++/119497] Improve diagnostic for failed assert(expr) in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119497 Tom Honermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at honermann dot net --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/119522] Notail attribute like musttail attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119522 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug other/119510] gcc_release will not add generated files for non-default languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ok, so #c8 seems to work and builds everything except for the libffi.info. Wonder if that isn't ok though, because the use of libffi is gcc implementation detail, we don't really install that library nor any

[Bug middle-end/119522] New: Notail attribute like musttail attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119522 Bug ID: 119522 Summary: Notail attribute like musttail attribute Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: mi

[Bug target/119386] [14/15 Regression][x64] Shared libraries can no longer be compiled with profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386 --- Comment #50 from Ard Biesheuvel --- (In reply to Ard Biesheuvel from comment #48) ... > We don't want to be forced to disable the stack protector, > I mean 'disable profiling' - there have been some similar issues with the stack protector,

[Bug c++/64500] push_to_top_level() shows up high during build of modern C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64500 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org --- Comment

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-Emmanuel Patry --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > I wonder if it is showing up due to running the testsuite with -jN It is indeed showing up with -jN on my machine. Good call!

[Bug modula2/118045] [15 Regression] libm2iso.so.20.0.0 contains an unresolvable reference to symbol casin (and 171 other similar warnings)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118045 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e7ac815d2051308ccb7a7469f7e7a1f0b69f7e5 commit r15-9014-g7e7ac815d2051308ccb7a7469f7e7a1f0b69f7e5 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Fri

[Bug other/119510] gcc_release will not add generated files for non-default languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfortunately m2 has some messed up dependencies (all other FEs are fine) - it attempts to build the whole FE for some strange reason and fails at that. So either we get that fixed (but that would mean on ol

[Bug c++/119401] [15 regression] ICE when lambda is used as template argument in member function parameter type since r15-7202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119401 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I wonder if it is showing up due to running the testsuite with -jN

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail --- Comment #3 from Sam Jame

[Bug other/119510] gcc_release will not add generated files for non-default languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So what about --- maintainer-scripts/gcc_release.jj 2025-03-28 15:44:23.714526549 +0100 +++ maintainer-scripts/gcc_release 2025-03-28 18:06:57.286295725 +0100 @@ -267,9 +267,17 @@ EOF esac

[Bug middle-end/114563] ggc_internal_alloc is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114563 --- Comment #8 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- > > Needs a workload where it matters > > PR119387 had > > 85.81% 1500713 cc1plus cc1plus [.] > ggc_internal_alloc(un > > for me. Can we keep an index to freelist from

[Bug cobol/119521] New: gcc-cobol generated programs with memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119521 Bug ID: 119521 Summary: gcc-cobol generated programs with memory leak Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: co

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Pierre-Emmanuel Patry from comment #1) > There is something funny happening here because canonical_paths1.rs should > not pass, nr2 tests are a list of test with an additional flag. We're using

[Bug c++/119401] [15 regression] ICE when lambda is used as template argument in member function parameter type since r15-7202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119401 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- The underlying problem is that we tsubst_lambda_expr three times for the same arguments, producing three different lambdas: 1) when forming the type of A<>::f 2) when forming the parameters of A<>::f 3) whe

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-Emmanuel Patry --- There is something funny happening here because canonical_paths1.rs should not pass, nr2 tests are a list of test with an additional flag. We're using it to reduce the gap between both name resolutio

[Bug d/117002] [13/14/15 Regression] lifetime.d: In function ‘_d_newclassT’: error: size of array element is not a multiple of its alignment with -Warray-bounds and -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002 --- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw --- So I'm currently thinking that perhaps this could be fixed my end. At the definition of the type, set TYPE_ALIGN and TYPE_PACKED to 1, so it's equivalent to: class __attribute__((packed)) Foo { ... }; Th

[Bug c++/118859] [OpenMP] dispatch accepts non-pointer template argument with adjust_args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118859 waffl3x changed: What|Removed |Added CC||waffl3x at protonmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/119401] [15 regression] ICE when lambda is used as template argument in member function parameter type since r15-7202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119401 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug cobol/119520] New: cobol1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (use of field with unknown TYPEDEF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119520 Bug ID: 119520 Summary: cobol1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (use of field with unknown TYPEDEF) Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/119516] Slow compilation with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119516 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- I am not sure this is an issue for compile time either. With -fno-checking, -O2 is only 12s while -O0 is 6s. GCC 14 with -O2 is 9s. Which might be the improvement without other checking enabled. Basically

[Bug other/119510] gcc_release will not add generated files for non-default languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119510 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- If it is just about documentation, it might be easier not to enable those extra languages during the build and just build their documentation. Something in the make regenerate-opt-urls style, where even when

[Bug target/119519] [14 Regression] RISC-V, autovectorization, internal compiler error when "V" RISC-V extension used.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119519 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|RISC-V, autovectorization, |[14 Regression] RISC-V,

[Bug c/119519] RISC-V, autovectorization, internal compiler error when "V" RISC-V extension used.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119519 Kirill Frolov changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|14.2.0 | Target|riscv

[Bug target/119519] [14 Regression] RISC-V, autovectorization, internal compiler error when "V" RISC-V extension used.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119519 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|RISC-V, autovectorization, |[14 Regression] RISC-V,

[Bug other/119510] gcc_release will not add generated files for non-default languages

my =all failed to pick up D given my GCC 7 system compiler doesn't have it (which means adding D complicates this for me at least). --- /tmp/cobol 2025-03-28 17:04:53.862299236 +0100 +++ /tmp/all2025-03-28 17:05:06.170485951 +0100 @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ gcc-15.1.0-RC-20250328/libffi/doc/

[Bug c/119519] New: RISC-V, autovectorization, internal compiler error when "V" RISC-V extension used.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119519 Bug ID: 119519 Summary: RISC-V, autovectorization, internal compiler error when "V" RISC-V extension used. Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/110498] Spurious warnings stringop-overflow and array-bounds copying data as bytes into vector::reserve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110498 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > (In reply to Michael Ragazzon from comment #1) > > I seem to also have encountered this issue while using `std::vector`. > > I think comment 1 is Bug 114758

  1   2   >