https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119492
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > So looking into this further, I think PR 15387 got fixed correctly via PR > > 49519 (and PR51323 and PR 50074). > > Note both mention not doing TER into the call to fix the issue: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519#c18 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19616#c11 > > I am still wondering if helps anyways since the testcase in comment #4 with > the musttail uncomment works iff not TERing into the tail call. > > Oh wait https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074#c14 which takes > about this exact loop and why it would be ok to look only at still > internal_arg_pointer . > > I am still thinking about not doing TER for tail calls might be the best > option anyways. Since in the long run we want to get rid of TER and such. Note thinking about this, TER for musttail calls should be disabled after https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/679182.html due to this too.
