[Bug tree-optimization/118194] [12/13/14/15 regression] spurious warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized with mlock

2024-12-24 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118194 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug debug/118198] GCC wrong debug information bug

2024-12-24 Thread imchuncai at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198 --- Comment #3 from Chuncai --- Got it, thank you.

[Bug debug/118198] GCC wrong debug information bug

2024-12-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/24490] [4.1 Regression] gcc / gdb backtrace problem

2024-12-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24490 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|| Resolution|INVALID

[Bug debug/118198] GCC wrong debug information bug

2024-12-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- must has been inlined and mostly optimized. In that the several copies of abort has been merged together. There is not much to be done here.

[Bug c/118198] New: GCC wrong debug information bug

2024-12-24 Thread imchuncai at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198 Bug ID: 118198 Summary: GCC wrong debug information bug Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c As

[Bug tree-optimization/118032] [15 regression] Bootstrap slowdown for risc-v

2024-12-24 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118032 --- Comment #31 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #30) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #28) > > I haven't tried yet, but do you mean something like the following? > > - /* Note: l + 1 is the number of cases

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargls from comment #17) > On 12/24/24 10:03, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 > > > > --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- > > F

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59960|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-24 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #17 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 12/24/24 10:03, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 > > --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- > From Harald's post. "There is another

[Bug middle-end/91883] Division by a constant could be optimized for known variables value range

2024-12-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91883 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to David Stone from comment #2) > Here's another example: That is a regression on the trunk, see PR 115910 for that issue. The original issue here is unrelated to that.

[Bug middle-end/91883] Division by a constant could be optimized for known variables value range

2024-12-24 Thread davidfromonline at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91883 David Stone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidfromonline at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/118194] [12/13/14/15 regression] spurious warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized with mlock

2024-12-24 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118194 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|spurious warning with |[12/13/14/15 regression]

[Bug target/118197] ICE: SIGSEGV in emit_move_insn (expr.cc:4635) at -O1 and above

2024-12-24 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118197 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Known to fail|

[Bug target/118197] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in emit_move_insn (expr.cc:4635) at -O1 and above

2024-12-24 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118197 Bug ID: 118197 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in emit_move_insn (expr.cc:4635) at -O1 and above Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-

[Bug middle-end/118050] [15 Regression] timevar.cc:163:18: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118050 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Will do.

[Bug middle-end/118050] [15 Regression] timevar.cc:163:18: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-24 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118050 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org --- Comment

[Bug c++/118195] accepted template member definition with a different template-head

2024-12-24 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118195 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug libstdc++/118196] The assignment operator for std::generator does not return, so generators cannot be reassigned

2024-12-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118196 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-12-24 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- Needed a minor tweak: + if (string->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER + || (string->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER // && on the inner paren instead of || + && (string->ts.kind != 1 && string->ts.is_c_interop

[Bug libstdc++/118196] New: The assignment operator for std::generator does not return, so generators cannot be reassigned

2024-12-24 Thread florintulba at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118196 Bug ID: 118196 Summary: The assignment operator for std::generator does not return, so generators cannot be reassigned Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

2024-12-24 Thread lis8215 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #10 from Siarhei Volkau --- Created attachment 59965 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59965&action=edit MIPS patch Ditto for 32-bit MIPS. MIPS emits: move$3,$0 move$2,$0 sw $3

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

2024-12-24 Thread lis8215 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 Siarhei Volkau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lis8215 at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- >From Harald's post. "There is another case I found while playing which is rejected: print *, f_c_string(c_char_"abc", asis)" I bet the parsing does not handle c_char_ with the two underscores. I h

[Bug fortran/117643] F_C_STRING from F23 is missing

2024-12-24 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117643 --- Comment #14 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) > The following additional patch from Harald posted on the gfortran list: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-December/061452.html > > di

[Bug c++/118195] New: accepted template member definition with a different template-head

2024-12-24 Thread ing.russomauro at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118195 Bug ID: 118195 Summary: accepted template member definition with a different template-head Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- run.cc compiles okay if I add -fno-gcse to compile command. dave@mx3210:~/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/testsuite$ cat xxx.sh /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc -B/home/dav

[Bug c/118194] New: spurious warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized

2024-12-24 Thread sshannin at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118194 Bug ID: 118194 Summary: spurious warning with -Wmaybe-uninitialized Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/118193] New: ICE: in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.cc:5362

2024-12-24 Thread wangbopku15 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118193 Bug ID: 118193 Summary: ICE: in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.cc:5362 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/118192] New: ICE: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/constexpr.cc:453

2024-12-24 Thread wangbopku15 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118192 Bug ID: 118192 Summary: ICE: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/constexpr.cc:453 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/118191] missing option to read __float128 from command line argument or string

2024-12-24 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |INVALID

[Bug c/118191] missing option to read __float128 from command line argument or string

2024-12-24 Thread newbie-02 at gmx dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191 newbie-02 changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from newbie-02 -

[Bug libstdc++/118022] : _Copy_awaiter should explicitly construct _Yielded_decvref

2024-12-24 Thread arsen at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118022 Arsen Arsenović changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/118032] [15 regression] Bootstrap slowdown for risc-v

2024-12-24 Thread pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118032 --- Comment #30 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #28) > I haven't tried yet, but do you mean something like the following? > - /* Note: l + 1 is the number of cases of the switch. */ > - if (l + 1 > (unsigned) para

[Bug c/118191] missing option to read __float128 from command line argument or string

2024-12-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/118022] : _Copy_awaiter should explicitly construct _Yielded_decvref

2024-12-24 Thread arsen at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118022 Arsen Arsenović changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/118191] New: missing option to read __float128 from command line argument or string

2024-12-24 Thread newbie-02 at gmx dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118191 Bug ID: 118191 Summary: missing option to read __float128 from command line argument or string Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/118174] [15 Regression] AArch64: Miscompilation at -O3 since r15-5943-gdc0dea98c96e02

2024-12-24 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118174 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug fortran/116254] new test case gfortran.dg/class_transformational_2.f90 from r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aad fails

2024-12-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

2024-12-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 118059, which changed state. Bug 118059 Summary: [15 Regression] ubsan instrumented gcc: valid value for type 'expr_t' in gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118059 What|

[Bug fortran/118059] [15 Regression] ubsan instrumented gcc: valid value for type 'expr_t' in gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc

2024-12-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118059 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/118186] [15 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/field-merge-16.c scan-tree-dump-times ifcombine "optimizing" 6

2024-12-24 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118186 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: |[15 regression] FAIL: |gc

[Bug target/118184] [15 regression] glibc regression on aarch64 due to early_ra deleting movti instruction since r15-5422-g279475fd7236a9

2024-12-24 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118184 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 regression] glibc |[15 regression] glibc |re