https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117928
Bug ID: 117928
Summary: z14 builtin for VLBR instruction missing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov ---
Thanks, here's a variant of the small testcase that fails on gcc-14 too, just
needed to make the integer field the first in the struct:
struct s {
int i[2];
float f[2];
double d;
};
void f(s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Alexander's testcase started with r15-882-g1d6199e5f8c1c0 (ran that just out of
curiosity while other machine was reducing) and indeed the FF one started with
r14-2786-gade30fad6669e5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106329
Jennifer Schmitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106329
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jennifer Schmitz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5289540ed58e42ae66255e31f22afe4ca0a6e15e
commit r15-5957-g5289540ed58e42ae66255e31f22afe4ca0a6e15e
Author: Jennifer Schmitz
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > > For me targetting aarch64, the peak memory is over 26G and it i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117927
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8772f37e45e9401c9a361548e00c9691424e75e0
commit r15-5956-g8772f37e45e9401c9a361548e00c9691424e75e0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117924
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
One issue in fold-mem-offsets is that it seems to do per-BB operation but
relies on global DF and looks at uses/defs also not within a BB? If it's
supposed
to be "global" then a better order than FOR_ALL_B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115438
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
For zen3/zen4 there might be a 2.5% regression left, so I'll leave this PR open
for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > For me targetting aarch64, the peak memory is over 26G and it is taking over
> > an hour.
-O2 Finally finished f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> For me targetting aarch64, the peak memory is over 26G and it is taking over
> an hour.
65.86% cc1 [.] _Z15bitmap_ior_intoP11bitmap_hea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
For me targetting aarch64, the peak memory is over 26G and it is taking over an
hour.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109105
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Invalid rotate optimization |[15 Regression] Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112092
--- Comment #15 from Demin Han ---
(In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #14)
> This is invalid code, because you haven't told GCC your inline assembly
> makes use of v8 or v24. You need to specify inputs and outputs correctly
> or otherw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85719
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
That would be awesome!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115792
eczbek.void at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eczbek.void at gmail dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117898
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afeef7f0d3537cd978931a5afcbd3d91c144bfeb
commit r15-5955-gafeef7f0d3537cd978931a5afcbd3d91c144bfeb
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-12-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117927
Bug ID: 117927
Summary: Invalid rotate optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #0)
> Sam may be able to follow up with a testcase extracted from original Firefox
> package for gcc-14.
```
float slant_xy, mults_changed_upem;
struct {
int x_sca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117901
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
I held off pushing because I had the scent of the problem. The "fix" of comment
#3 was a dead giveaway. It turns out to be nothing to do with my fix for 102689
but is a latent bug exposed by the testcase. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] emits 3dnow |[14/15 Regression] emits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117926
Bug ID: 117926
Summary: [15 Regression] emits MMX from autovectorized GIMPLE
without emms at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong
-Johann Lay ---
Still confirmed with
gcc version 15.0.0 20241205 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #12)
>
> I see. Thank you. I've reproduced it with using -mlra.
This case is really non-trivial and involves inheritance. Also the live
analysis in LRA af
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117904
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:363382ac7c2b8f6a09415e905b349bb7eaeca38a
commit r15-5951-g363382ac7c2b8f6a09415e905b349bb7eaeca38a
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114111
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
The avr backend has some combiner patterns to mitigate the bloated code,
however since recently, some pass is popping up subregs like in:
(insn 10 9 15 2 (set (reg:HI 48 [ _5 ])
(plus:HI (reg/v:H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice unexpected expression |[14/15 Regression] ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117923
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org|antoyo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85719
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
IMO the documentation on "io", "io_low" and "address" has improved. Maybe it
is clearer now? There's also an example what code will be generated for
attribute "address".
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117925
Bug ID: 117925
Summary: ice unexpected expression '(FnPtr)(fnPtr)' of kind
cast_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112268
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117830
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Müllner ---
Thank you for reporting this!
I can reproduce this issue on x86_64 (I did not test on other architectures).
I have also confirmed that the suspected change (1c4d39ada33d) causes this
by validating that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117875
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > I'm talking about the number of iterations of the second loop (after loop
> > splitting), the niter expressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112092
--- Comment #14 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
This is invalid code, because you haven't told GCC your inline assembly
makes use of v8 or v24. You need to specify inputs and outputs correctly
or otherwise the compiler will consider these registers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116778
--- Comment #5 from Denis Chertykov ---
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/670949.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117516
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 59797
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59797&action=edit
gcc15-pr117516-wip.patch
So far just formatting cleanups and turning tree parameters/members into bool
if they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117911
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117819
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117924
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
looking at dse3 dump we get:
[local count: 1073741824]:
MEM[(struct _Bvector_impl_data *)&data] ={v} {CLOBBER(bob)};
MEM[(struct __as_base &)&data] ={v} {CLOBBER(bob)};
_13 = MEM[(const struct vecto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116778
--- Comment #4 from Denis Chertykov ---
The bug appears in LRA after rematerialization pass while creating live ranges.
File lra.cc:
*
/* Now we know what pseudos should be spill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117615
--- Comment #12 from Alec ---
Thank you guys for the speedy pickup, triage, and turnaround! Keep up the good
work!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117924
Bug ID: 117924
Summary: unused std::vector are not optimized out fully
at gimple level
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117860
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117860
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3cb0c3302a7c16e661a08c15c897c8f7bbb5d23
commit r15-5950-gb3cb0c3302a7c16e661a08c15c897c8f7bbb5d23
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116778
--- Comment #3 from Denis Chertykov ---
Created attachment 59796
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59796&action=edit
Modified test case "bf.c"
I worked with a modified test case (bf.c):
struct
{
unsigned long long u33 : 33
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116778
Denis Chertykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denisc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117923
Bug ID: 117923
Summary: ICE in SET_TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS on Aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116771
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112574
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117801
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc0dea98c96e02c6b24060170bc88da8d4931bc2
commit r15-5943-gdc0dea98c96e02c6b24060170bc88da8d4931bc2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117921
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0368c42507328774cadbea589509b95aaf3cb826
commit r15-5942-g0368c42507328774cadbea589509b95aaf3cb826
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117886
--- Comment #6 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 59794
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59794&action=edit
Patch to fix the issue
I cannot use your reproducer, I get the following error:
main.c: In function ‘create_code’:
m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117516
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, the warning as implemented doesn't really diagnose all the bugs, just
the first one, and e.g. on
struct A { int a; char b[]; int c; };
struct B { struct A d; struct A e[]; struct A f; };
struct C {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #154 from Filip Kastl ---
> I suggest you file a new bugreport for the regression.
Ok, it is now pr117922
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117922
Bug ID: 117922
Summary: [15 Regression] 1000% compilation time slow down on
the testcase from pr26854
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #153 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #152)
> I've just noticed that this bug got worse. Running
>
> time gcc -O2 all.i
>
> for GCC 14.2 gets me
>
> real 2m57.090s
> user 2m36.641s
> sys 0m20.309s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102259
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Michel Morin from comment #2)
> Given that the testcase works file when compiled with Clang, libcxx would
> have some workround for it.
It just uses fread(3) instead of read(2).
ECT_GCC=/home/fkastl/gcc/build/gcc/xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/fkastl/gcc/build/gcc/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release
--disable-libsanitizer --prefix=/home/fkastl/gcc/inst
Thread model: posix
Supported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117921
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117816
--- Comment #2 from Konstantinos Eleftheriou ---
Submitted my proposed fix to the lists:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/670921.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117921
Bug ID: 117921
Summary: containers do not use ADL swap for Compare, Pred or
Hash types
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49807
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr, mips*-*-* |mips*-*-*
--- Comment #9 from Georg-J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14 Regression] Miscompiled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116799
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0eed81612ad6eac2bec60286348a103d4dc02a5a
commit r15-5940-g0eed81612ad6eac2bec60286348a103d4dc02a5a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113994
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0eed81612ad6eac2bec60286348a103d4dc02a5a
commit r15-5940-g0eed81612ad6eac2bec60286348a103d4dc02a5a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107980
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107980
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fca04028d7075a6eaae350774a3916f14d4004ae
commit r15-5939-gfca04028d7075a6eaae350774a3916f14d4004ae
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107957
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117911
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
> On 5 Dec 2024, at 11:51, 19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
> wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117911
>
> --- Comment #7 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
> (In reply to Sam James
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 117615, which changed state.
Bug 117615 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] constexpr failure static_cast of
Derived virtual Pointer to Member function since r6-4014-gdcdbc004d531b4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117911
--- Comment #7 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> (In reply to CTC from comment #5)
> > I tried to reduce it with Creduce and got "HUP caught" after 7 hours.
>
> Sorry to ask the obvious, but are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 117615, which changed state.
Bug 117615 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] constexpr failure static_cast of
Derived virtual Pointer to Member function since r6-4014-gdcdbc004d531b4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117615
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102786
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Simon Martin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a73efcbdc5fb9c3f6ab0cba718dd25b5062fc22
commit r14-11063-g4a73efcbdc5fb9c3f6ab0cba718dd25b5062fc22
Author: Simon Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117615
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Simon Martin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a73efcbdc5fb9c3f6ab0cba718dd25b5062fc22
commit r14-11063-g4a73efcbdc5fb9c3f6ab0cba718dd25b5062fc22
Author: Simon Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107957
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf6f77edd625cfe2f2f164e90437df318b96527f
commit r15-5938-gbf6f77edd625cfe2f2f164e90437df318b96527f
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114729
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #47 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
On avr, fixed in v12.5, v13.4, and v14.3+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #46 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:499d3dc84e40849f607154bd76ed07d37d744cc1
commit r12-10848-g499d3dc84e40849f607154bd76ed07d37d744cc1
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117911
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #45 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45bc6c452ef182dd08c0f0836fef88ad5b67b3aa
commit r13-9231-g45bc6c452ef182dd08c0f0836fef88ad5b67b3aa
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116625
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117911
--- Comment #5 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
I tried to reduce it with Creduce and got "HUP caught" after 7 hours.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #44 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0eb7f0a860add7b1c79ae4248e1960120bc77d60
commit r14-11062-g0eb7f0a860add7b1c79ae4248e1960120bc77d60
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107957
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b78c0dcb1b6b523880ee193698defca3ebd0b3f7
commit r15-5937-gb78c0dcb1b6b523880ee193698defca3ebd0b3f7
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
