[Bug fortran/117842] New: Function wrongly returning empty character string if allocated on the heap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117842 Bug ID: 117842 Summary: Function wrongly returning empty character string if allocated on the heap Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug target/117839] Redundant vector XOR instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117839 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- It seems to me we fail to PRE the various rN:VnDI = const_vector [0] insns, one issue of course is that we have both V4DI and V2DI sets where with pseudos we don't know they are equivalent. While there's g

[Bug middle-end/117841] Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117841 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- _83 = (sizetype) &k; _84 = (sizetype) &MEM [(void *)&b + 2B]; _85 = _83 + _84; _86 = (sizetype) &b; _87 = _85 - _86; g_88 = (char *) _87; *g_88 = 0; _90 = g_88 - &k; _91 = (unsigned int) _

[Bug middle-end/117841] Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117841 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-29 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/117841] Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117841 --- Comment #1 from Yunbo Ni --- Bisected to https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=6bf66276e3e41d5d92f7b7260e98b6a111653805

[Bug c/117841] New: Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117841 Bug ID: 117841 Summary: Miscompile with -O3 and -O0/1/2 Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c As

[Bug tree-optimization/105771] [12/13/14/15 regression] matrix partial transposition with -O3 since r8-5159-g1cc521f1a824b591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105771 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|14.2.1, 15.0| Keywords|needs-bisection

[Bug fortran/117840] backslash at the end of a commented line, in files that need to be preprocessed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117840 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/117840] backslash at the end of a commented line, in files that need to be preprocessed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117840 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Preprocess comes before fortran parsing and that is by design. Let me expand on that. Preprocessing happens before parsing so 1) \ on the end of a line is a lin

[Bug fortran/117840] backslash at the end of a commented line, in files that need to be preprocessed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117840 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/117840] New: backslash at the end of a commented line, in files that need to be preprocessed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117840 Bug ID: 117840 Summary: backslash at the end of a commented line, in files that need to be preprocessed Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/117829] [12/13/14 regression] False positive report for Warray-bounds with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117829 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|False positive report for |[12/13/14 regression] False

[Bug sanitizer/108083] [12/13/14/15 regression] Missed memory leak detection (code with memory leak does not get triggered when I run the executable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108083 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Works with musl.

[Bug target/117839] Redundant vector XOR instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117839 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/117839] Redundant vector XOR instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117839 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug ipa/116296] [12/13/14/15 Regression] internal compiler error: in merge, at ipa-modref-tree.cc:176 at -O3 since r12-4227-g44b61586d8640b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/106056] Missing call to targetm.asm_out.final_postscan_insn after processing an asm_input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106056 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-source --- Comment #3 from Sam James

[Bug c++/91780] Discrepancy between gcc 7.4, through 9.2, compared to clang.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91780 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/117839] New: Redundant vector XOR instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117839 Bug ID: 117839 Summary: Redundant vector XOR instructions Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/80862] [x86] Wrong rounding results for some test cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80862 Bug 80862 depends on bug 73350, which changed state. Bug 73350 Summary: AVX512: GCC optimizes away rounding flags https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/73350] AVX512: GCC optimizes away rounding flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/117801] [15 regression] aarch64: 20% regression in TSVC s278 since r15-3509-gd34cda72098867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117801 --- Comment #12 from Dhruv Chawla --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > Created attachment 59722 [details] > patch > > This patch passed bootstrap & regtest on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I did > not check whether it solves the aar

[Bug tree-optimization/105771] [12/13 regression] matrix partial transposition with -O3 since r8-5159-g1cc521f1a824b591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105771 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|matrix partial |[12/13 regression] matrix

[Bug sanitizer/108083] [12/13/14/15 regression] Missed memory leak detection (code with memory leak does not get triggered when I run the executable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108083 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/108236] std::exclusive_scan with execution policy does not work in-place

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108236 Paul Preney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul at preney dot ca --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/111502] Suboptimal unaligned 2/4-byte memcpy on strict-align targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-11-29 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/110626] [13/14/15 regression] Duplicated finalization in derived

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110626 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4 Summary|Duplicated finaliza

[Bug target/73350] AVX512: GCC optimizes away rounding flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkoval at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/117838] [12/13/14/15 regression] IRA issues: The higher cost variable a is spilled for the lower cost variable conflict_a in improve_allocation() since r12-6416-g037cc0b4a6646c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117838 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/117838] New: IRA issues: The higher cost variable a is spilled for the lower cost variable conflict_a in improve_allocatuion()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117838 Bug ID: 117838 Summary: IRA issues: The higher cost variable a is spilled for the lower cost variable conflict_a in improve_allocatuion() Product: gcc Version: 1

[Bug c++/117827] [12/13/14/15 regression] Incorrect destructor calls after array-new-expression since r12-6328-gbeaee0a871b648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117827 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summary

[Bug c++/117813] [14 Regression] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/117837] New: ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117837 Bug ID: 117837 Summary: ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/83161] Feature request: add a builtin for printing structs and classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83161 David Heidelberg (okias) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david at ixit dot cz --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 116675, which changed state. Bug 116675 Summary: No blend constant permute for V8HImode with just SSE2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116675 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/116675] No blend constant permute for V8HImode with just SSE2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116675 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug c++/117826] [15 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in hash, at tree.h:5958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117826 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #14 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > (In reply to kargls from comment #11) > > This is not processor-dependent behavior. gfortran implements > > real*complex in accordance with the words of t

[Bug ipa/117813] [14 Regression] GCC14 + -fsanitize=undefined + -Os + recursive_directory_iterator results in undefined reference since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117813 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] GCC14 + |[14 Regression] GCC14 + |

[Bug debug/104277] [meta-bug] gstatement-frontiers causes fcompare-debug issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/117830] [15 Regression] Miscompilation of 464.h264ref at -O2 -march=generic since r15-5563-g1c4d39ada33d36

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117830 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/117752] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117752 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117723] [15 Regression] Miscompile with -O1+ since r15-5003-gae074c69fd5aff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117723 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug c/100501] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and void statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100501 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xieym3 at zohomail dot com --- Commen

[Bug fortran/117765] Impure function within a BLOCK construct within a DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117765 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30078cb0cc5e19d3de55d218ae500d59a21e7537 commit r15-5767-g30078cb0cc5e19d3de55d218ae500d59a21e7537 Author: Steven G. Kargl Date:

[Bug debug/104277] [meta-bug] gstatement-frontiers causes fcompare-debug issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104277 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva --- Unlikely :-( I haven't been involved with that work for over 5 years. Without debug info consumer support, the notes are hardly useful, and AFAIK that support is not forthcoming, so my recommendation has

[Bug c++/117826] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in hash, at tree.h:5958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117826 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Full backtrace: bug.cpp:4294:29: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0x290315e internal_error(char const*, ...) /home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc-match/gcc/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:518 0

[Bug c++/117826] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in hash, at tree.h:5958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117826 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||GC --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug c/100501] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with inline-asm and void statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100501 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug other/117815] RFE: provide a way to capture SARIF for all gcc invocations in a build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117815 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/117820] Formatted output gives wrong result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) --- snip --- > > The error at line 16 is not correct. > > Of course it is! But when you add _8 you get what you want. > > BTW: why does the integer(4) case not show th

[Bug c++/117817] [13 Regression] Compile error when taking address of temporary array in sizeof operator since r13-6716-g31cdfdef04701e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Summary|[13 Regression] Compile

[Bug tree-optimization/117142] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2 at -O1 and above since r13-1754-g7a158a5776f5ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/117820] Formatted output gives wrong result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #2) > If I add a couple more print statements: > > print *, -9223372036854775807 > print *, -9223372036854775808 > > $ gfc -frange-check -Wall pr11782

[Bug tree-optimization/117142] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2 at -O1 and above since r13-1754-g7a158a5776f5ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117142 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fd9461976b325efd134f9004a7958ebd008148f commit r14-10997-g8fd9461976b325efd134f9004a7958ebd008148f Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug tree-optimization/92408] strlen(s) != 0 not folded into *s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92408 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/117828] [15 Regression] -g and error: ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’ is not compatible since r15-5470

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117828 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from ue

[Bug tree-optimization/92408] strlen(s) != 0 not folded into *s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92408 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug go/117833] [15 regression] Bootstrap failure in gcc/go/gofrontend/go-encode-id.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117833 --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The code is safe but I can see that it would be difficult for the compiler to see that. I'll increase the buffer size.

[Bug rtl-optimization/63315] -fcompare-debug bootstrap issue in libjava (fixup_abnormal_edges related)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/117791] Segmentation fault when using -fcheck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117791 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2261a15c0715cbf5c129b66ee44fc1d3a9e36972 commit r15-5766-g2261a15c0715cbf5c129b66ee44fc1d3a9e36972 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: W

[Bug libfortran/117820] Formatted output gives wrong result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- >From the standard, the relevent text is: 13.7.2.4 B, O, and Z editing --- The value of m shall not exceed the value of w, except when w is zero. If m is zero and the internal value consists of all zero bit

[Bug rtl-optimization/117836] New: [meta-bug] favoid-store-forwarding issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117836 Bug ID: 117836 Summary: [meta-bug] favoid-store-forwarding issues Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/117826] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in hash, at tree.h:5958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117826 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- REducing ...

[Bug ipa/117824] ipa-modref isn't documented in gccint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117824 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/117834] [14/15 Regression] libgfortran doesn't compile unless `PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER` is defined on powerpc-darwin since r14-6425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117834 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Summary|libgfortran do

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #13 from mjr19 at cam dot ac.uk --- (In reply to kargls from comment #11) > On 11/28/24 04:54, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > The Fortran standard stops at this point and does not specify the > actual underlying algorithm. Th

[Bug go/117833] [15 regression] Bootstrap failure in gcc/go/gofrontend/go-encode-id.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117833 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Started with r15-5735-g1046c32de4956c

[Bug ada/114398] [13/14/15 regression] Storage_Error with 'Access of primitive function returning limited type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114398 --- Comment #11 from Dennis van Raaij --- Thanks for solving the issue.

[Bug ada/114300] ICE on instantiation of package with a nested ghost package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114300 --- Comment #5 from Dennis van Raaij --- Thanks for solving the issue.

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/116416] Missing optimization: compile time evaluation of prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116416 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/113798] [C++26] P2662R3 - Pack indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113798 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4954130d43d478a23ec8b65f5d861167935d77a commit r15-5764-ga4954130d43d478a23ec8b65f5d861167935d77a Author: Marek Polacek Date: Th

[Bug c++/116416] Missing optimization: compile time evaluation of prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116416 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/117805] complex type, -Ofast and IEEE-754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 --- Comment #11 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 11/28/24 04:54, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117805 > > --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- > Note with a patch like in comment#4 you'

[Bug go/117833] [15 regression] Bootstrap failure in gcc/go/gofrontend/go-encode-id.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117833 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or just change char buf[8]; to char buf[16]; The function has char buf[16]; elsewhere, so it won't make the frame larger. In any case, I think gcc/go/gofrontend/ needs to go through upstream.

[Bug c++/117231] [15 regression] Incorrect code generation for std::generator since r15-3840-g650e9156656187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Thanks. If so, Looking at the generated code (input to the coroutine lowering) it seems highly likely that this results from the use of a statement expression co

[Bug fortran/117765] Impure function within a BLOCK construct within a DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117765 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/117833] [15 regression] Bootstrap failure in gcc/go/gofrontend/go-encode-id.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117833 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/117065] [15 regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in type_has_padding_at_level_p, at gimple-fold.cc:4820 since r15-3328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117065 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/117830] [15 Regression] Miscompilation of 464.h264ref at -O2 -march=generic since r15-5563-g1c4d39ada33d36

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117830 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/117827] [12/13/14/15 regression] Incorrect destructor calls after array-new-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117827 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Summary|Incorrect destructo

[Bug target/117835] wrong code with -O -favoid-store-forwarding -mno-push-args --param=store-forwarding-max-distance=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117835 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 CC|

[Bug target/117835] New: wrong code with -O -favoid-store-forwarding -mno-push-args --param=store-forwarding-max-distance=0

pported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20241128 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug rtl-optimization/117770] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr37922.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117770 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #5) > I'm working on trying to split the code after reload. OK. But there is a still LRA bug which incorrectly makes r25 dead before the division insn and anal

[Bug go/117833] [15 regression] Bootstrap failure in gcc/go/gofrontend/go-encode-id.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117833 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- See also https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/devel:gcc:next/gcc15/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64 (that builds with --disable-werror).

[Bug c++/117231] [15 regression] Incorrect code generation for std::generator since r15-3840-g650e9156656187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thanks. If so, it would be nice to include this testcase into the testsuite afterwards (sure, not with println but int e = 0; and if (++e != item) __builtin_abort (); in the loop plus if (e != 3) __builtin_

[Bug c++/117231] [15 regression] Incorrect code generation for std::generator since r15-3840-g650e9156656187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- with my local patches (which I will ping this week) I see: $ ./gcc/xg++ -Bgcc -std=c++2c /src-local/cxx-coroutines/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/pr117231.C -o t ./t 1 2 3 So this is possibly a non-obvious

[Bug c++/116416] Missing optimization: compile time evaluation of prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116416 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Thanks. Yeah, it was approved. But I still see FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr78687.C scan-tree-dump sra "Removing load:.*ptr;" even once I've rebased my patch. Weird, because the FAIL *was* gone when I trie

[Bug target/117105] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-code-hoisting -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117105 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|15.0|14.3

[Bug target/117105] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-code-hoisting -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117105 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- *** Bug 115521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/115521] [14/15 regression] ICE at -O1 with "-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115521 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/114942] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-sra -fno-guess-branch-probability": in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114942 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/117105] [15 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-code-hoisting -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-sra" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117105 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea36e9d17971210762580489b71b05e7bf7faa2e commit r14-10996-gea36e9d17971210762580489b71b05e7bf7faa2e Author: Vladimir N. Maka

[Bug target/114942] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-sra -fno-guess-branch-probability": in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114942 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:196ab7853ef5dc225833a914491add0a3adeaf9d commit r14-10995-g196ab7853ef5dc225833a914491add0a3adeaf9d Author: Vladimir N. Mak

[Bug c++/117231] [15 regression] Incorrect code generation for std::generator since r15-3840-g650e9156656187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117231 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/117360] [15 regression] ext-dce.cc:573:15: runtime error: shift exponent 127 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117360 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 59737 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59737&action=edit gcc15-pr117360.patch So here is a patch I'm proposing (but I haven't actually reproduced the error, so this is

[Bug rtl-optimization/117770] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr37922.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117770 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- I'm working on trying to split the code after reload.

[Bug libstdc++/117822] [C++23] basic_stacktrace allocator-extended move constructor uses _Allocator instead of _AllocTraits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117822 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug target/117834] libgfortran doesn't compile unless `PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER` is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117834 --- Comment #3 from Gleb Mazovetskiy --- Note that for OSX 10.4 (aka darwin8) `PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER` can be defined like this: #define PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER {_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_SIG_init, {0}}

  1   2   >