https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117820
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) --- snip --- > > The error at line 16 is not correct. > > Of course it is! But when you add _8 you get what you want. > > BTW: why does the integer(4) case not show the same problems? Oh dang, I forgot about that detail. ( Need more turkey, ;) ) I have been looking at the integer 4 as well.
