https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28614
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116956
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #371 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #370)
> I can also confirm that Kaz' sh-lra-take3 branch fixes the build of Python
> 3.13 which fails to build with the usual register starving problem from
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116962
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116968
Bug ID: 116968
Summary: There should be an rtl version of
stmt_unremovable_because_of_non_call_eh_p
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116959
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116956
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116949
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, but note the vectorizer internally (up to recent Tamars patch?) made use
of walk_stmt specifically for pattern stmts so it was(?) still needed.
There's also GENERIC comparison handling in genmatch be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #370 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
I can also confirm that Kaz' sh-lra-take3 branch fixes the build of Python 3.13
which fails to build with the usual register starving problem from PR81426:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116937
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116967
--- Comment #1 from Jan Schultke ---
I really like the Clang output by the way, which GCC could copy almost
directly:
> :2:5: warning: 'constinit' specifier missing on initializing
> declaration of 'x' [-Wmissing-constinit]
> 2 | int x;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116967
Bug ID: 116967
Summary: Accepts-invalid missing constinit specifier on
initializing declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69374
--- Comment #25 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Gerald Pfeifer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:186be7f37aed3b141af6367e05d28c5bcb0d9330
commit r15-4053-g186be7f37aed3b141af6367e05d28c5bcb0d9330
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116966
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Comment from the testcase:
/* Now test some warnings. */
object.p1; /* This warning does not seem to be produced in C++. dg-warning
"value computed is not used" */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116965
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
oh, I see. Ugh.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116965
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>contained a dg-* directive syntax issue which meant a directive was being
>silently ignored.
Yes and that was deliberate, comment from the testcase itself:
/* There is a problem with the testsuite on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116966
Bug ID: 116966
Summary: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-20.mm test fails after
syntax fix
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116965
Bug ID: 116965
Summary: obj-c++.dg/fobjc-std-1.mm test fails after syntax fix
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116911
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #9)
> Patch submitted:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/664449.html
>
> Sorry about the breakage.
No worries, it's part of the fun and point o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116911
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108770
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116913
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #369 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #346)
>
> ... I've noticed that this is the same as the existing
> MAYBE_BASE_REGISTER_RTX_P.
>
> I've inserted a patch into the stash to tighten all the existing memory
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116964
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
This occurred at revision r15-4033-g1f619fe2592.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116963
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116964
Bug ID: 116964
Summary: FAIL: 18_support/comparisons/algorithms/fallback.cc
-std=gnu++20 (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116963
Bug ID: 116963
Summary: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/parallel_mode.cc
(test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116962
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
maybe naked attribute should imply no_stack_protector attribute (if it is not
already).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116962
Bug ID: 116962
Summary: Bad interaction between __attribute__((naked)) and
-fstack-protector-all
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116755
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.3.0, 14.2.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116857
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 14.3 and 13.4 too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116857
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24e2b4cf7902fbdc6c921cfaf9674f844146b3e1
commit r13-9075-g24e2b4cf7902fbdc6c921cfaf9674f844146b3e1
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116755
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ea30d4a5b211cc8ddda8f7f33bb2308b681be74
commit r13-9074-g7ea30d4a5b211cc8ddda8f7f33bb2308b681be74
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116951
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
"std" for checking the components in namespace std?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/0b677d90ee8703a1aad7adb6c7f7f7c892e3cc78 is
the only big change I can spot to that, but I've no idea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
Bug ID: 116961
Summary: Valgrind reports uninitialized memory use in dstruct.d
(dmd.dstruct._isZeroInit(dmd.expression.Expression)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116853#c0
Nice catch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116951
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
The approach is fine with me, I'll wait a few days for bikeshedding on name and
then submit something. I agree there's no harm in yet another option and we can
just include it in yes later if things go OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116914
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116911
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37475
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|14.3
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105769
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59281&action=edit
Slightly more reduced
Removed iostream. Still need to remove the std::function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116369
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ef6b95d5dabba0a907d9545f901c77f0a5cb42d
commit r14-10742-g4ef6b95d5dabba0a907d9545f901c77f0a5cb42d
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37475
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4253d6a170f40725ce3a11ce7a3e236b6e4842f
commit r14-10737-gc4253d6a170f40725ce3a11ce7a3e236b6e4842f
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116857
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b09baab8c751c6d14c1028dcaf9497a5c39b695
commit r14-10738-g1b09baab8c751c6d14c1028dcaf9497a5c39b695
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61584f377ceee868c73a994e4d9d7b7bee5fb443
commit r14-10734-g61584f377ceee868c73a994e4d9d7b7bee5fb443
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116755
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aeb54d0f3a9eb9363157a040beaddd4939bd4774
commit r14-10732-gaeb54d0f3a9eb9363157a040beaddd4939bd4774
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||c++-lambda
Blocks|
rn Foo<[] {}>();
};
}
int main() {
foo();
}
```
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20241003/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105769
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59280
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59280&action=edit
Patch which fixes it
This is the patch which is on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-Octo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85788
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105769
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106762
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116806
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116951
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Not "stl" though please.
>
> STL != the C++ standard library
Sorry bad habit. maybe stdcxxcontainers instead since most (if not all) is
dealing with the cont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116957
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17001
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||earl_chew at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17001
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bitmap at pan dot homelinux.com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116959
--- Comment #1 from Edwin Lu ---
Created attachment 59279
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59279&action=edit
vwsll-run.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116959
Bug ID: 116959
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: more ICEs in
compute_nregs_for_mode
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #11 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Related to https://wg21.link/P2846
I was actually planning on working on the vector(from_range_t, R&&) constructor
today, after reviewing the paper above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I think the fornt-end is producing some odd code here:
return * = ...
And that is also confusing some of the optimizers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108770
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> I don't think we can change that
But "that" I mean the fact that the transform_view iterators do not meet the
classic RandomAccessIterator requirements.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-03 0:00
--- Comment #7 from J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
;; Function
std::ranges::views::__adaptor::_Partial
>::operator()
>, std::ranges::transform_view, std::_Bind_front,
int> > >(this
std::ranges::views::__adaptor::_Partial
>&&, std::ranges::transform_view,
std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #4 from Avi Kivity ---
Ah, I see you mention they aren't random access iterators (though maybe they
should be)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #3 from Avi Kivity ---
Is from_range_t really necessary? Shouldn't the vector constructor from
iterator pair detect that constant-time size is available and size the vector
appropriately?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116957
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
-Wl, is registered as a linker input file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Related to https://wg21.link/P2846
The transform_view is a sized_range already.
The problem is that we haven't implemented the vector(from_range_t, R&&)
constructor yet, so it does vector(ranges::begin(x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
Bug ID: 116958
Summary: [missed optimization] std::views::transform loses
track of the range size
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of
its recipients. This is a permanent error.
The following address failed:
dennis.drisc...@verizon.net:
SMTP error from remote server for TEXT command, hos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] ICE with|[15 regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, with C++
typedef float __v4sf __attribute__((vector_size (16)));
__v4sf a, b, c;
void
foo ()
{
c = a > b ? a : b;
}
this started to ICE already with
r15-3876-gcc40795d8956d78e719a6acc83d5abad7032a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] ICE with|[15 regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116957
Bug ID: 116957
Summary: Creation of pre-compiled header (-x c-header, -x
c++-header) confused by linker options (eg -Wl,-g)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116940
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116896
--- Comment #28 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Comment on attachment 59275
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59275
gcc15-pr116896.patch
>+ rtx zero = NULL_RTX;
>+ if (op2 != const0_rtx && TARGET_IEEE_FP && GET_MODE (dest) == SImode)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112398
Alexey Merzlyakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexey.merzlyakov at samsung
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116896
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59267|0 |1
is obsolete|
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
