https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116512
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab214ef734bfc3dcffcf79ff9e1dd651c2b40566
commit r15-3314-gab214ef734bfc3dcffcf79ff9e1dd651c2b40566
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116538
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note on x86, XFmode has mode_to_bits which is 128 or 96 but precision is 80.
So changing mode_to_bits to return precision is 100% the wrong thing.
So the bug might be the case there is a place which is usi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116538
Bug ID: 116538
Summary: GET_MODE_BITSIZE() returns wrong value for PSImode
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116525
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think it is more related the changelog for testsuite rather than anything
> else.
Can you please elaborate?
There are scripts in contrib/gcc-changelog/ y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94787
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59026
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59026&action=edit
The (pop cmp 1) |& (a cmp 0) testcase
This is the full one.
Note `a ? 1 : b` is also reduced down to `a | b` (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116419
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116537
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661831.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661832.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116419
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aff7f677120ec394adcedd0dd5cc3afa3b5be102
commit r15-3312-gaff7f677120ec394adcedd0dd5cc3afa3b5be102
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Spinning. Should have some results tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116143
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I was wrong initially about this being intermittent. It always fails for a
compiler built with --enable-checking=release and it started with
r15-1410-gf89f9c7ae7190c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98454
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #208 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Building with Go enabled, fails with:
during RTL pass: subreg3
../../../libgo/go/unicode/utf16/utf16.go: In function 'unicode/utf16.Encode':
../../../libgo/go/unicode/utf16/utf16.go:56:1: inter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116516
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bfeba12c86b4d0dae27d99b484f64774dd49398
commit r15-3308-g6bfeba12c86b4d0dae27d99b484f64774dd49398
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > Tentative obvious fix for NULL pointer dereference:
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc b/gcc/fortran/tran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116369
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #6 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> Tentative obvious fix for NULL pointer dereference:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc
> index 7ab82fa2f5b..de38f4a808f 1006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #5)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> > (In reply to kargls from comment #1)
> > > (In reply to philippe.wautelet from comment #0)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #5 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #1)
> > (In reply to philippe.wautelet from comment #0)
> >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure it is conforming to the Fortran stand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #1)
> (In reply to philippe.wautelet from comment #0)
>
> >
> > I'm not sure it is conforming to the Fortran standard but it shouldn't
> > trigger an ICE.
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tentative obvious fix for NULL pointer dereference:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc
index 7ab82fa2f5b..de38f4a808f 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc
+++ b/gcc/fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-29
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116537
Bug ID: 116537
Summary: integer_three_node looks like it can be removed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improvement
Severity: enhanceme
-O0, it still breaks:
$ avr-gcc -S lra-bug.c -O0 -mlra
lra-bug.c:6:1: internal compiler error: in get_reload_reg, at
lra-constraints.cc:755
6 | }
| ^
gcc version 15.0.0 20240829 (experimental) (GCC)
...ok, the ICE is actually from a different place now (LRA instead of backend),
so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115830
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116530
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116536
Bug ID: 116536
Summary: [15 Regression] gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c: error
executing dg-final since r15-3254-g3f51f0dc88e
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] |[15 Regression]
|`pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116508
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:215c7e3084ea9ec75dcc803f73c94b36e2751e54
commit r15-3306-g215c7e3084ea9ec75dcc803f73c94b36e2751e54
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116534
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116534
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-29
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116535
Bug ID: 116535
Summary: LTO partitioning vs. offloading compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp, wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116534
Bug ID: 116534
Summary: [14 regression] internal compiler error with
comparison of pointers calculated with array offset
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90847
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
More:
static int iarr2 alignas(16); //accepted by all gcc,clang and msvc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlame646 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116532
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116516
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116516
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac6d433b02ce26a646b2a7254b1d87fcc06b0beb
commit r15-3288-gac6d433b02ce26a646b2a7254b1d87fcc06b0beb
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115830
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115905
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115830
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07e5e054a1c579dec3e1ed2192992b2fea14ad40
commit r15-3286-g07e5e054a1c579dec3e1ed2192992b2fea14ad40
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105475
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Arsen Ars
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113457
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Arsen Ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108620
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #6)
> I think it'd be okay to just add the testcase as a regression test consider
> this resolved. WDYT, Iain?
yes - if it's no longer reproducible - then adding the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109867
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105104
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Arsen Arsenovic :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9c54e9a036189e8961ec17e118fccf794d7bfab
commit r15-3285-gd9c54e9a036189e8961ec17e118fccf794d7bfab
Author: Arsen ArsenoviÄ
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116531
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > only for arm (an EABI difference?)
>
> Constructors return "this" for arm eabi (note aarch64 follows the original
> ia64 c++ abi here).
Deconstructors too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116531
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
> only for arm (an EABI difference?)
Constructors return "this" for arm eabi (note aarch64 follows the original ia64
c++ abi here).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b729d2ff3259e5b1d40f93d4f9e7edf5f0064f4
commit r15-3283-g4b729d2ff3259e5b1d40f93d4f9e7edf5f0064f4
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Thu A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116533
Bug ID: 116533
Summary: Possibly missing SAVE_EXPR in
get_member_function_from_ptrfunc()
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Halalaluyafail3 from comment #0)
> haven't seen any restrictions on using a unique_ptr with a reference type so
> I assume that this is OK (since C++17).
I'm not sure if that's actually inten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-29
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116138
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116532
Bug ID: 116532
Summary: GCC accepts invaild static int iarr2 alignas(16)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116529
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_DEPRECATED=0 allows it to compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116531
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114298
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
because LWG 3714 is an issue, and we treat most issues as DRs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114298
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think we decided we would backport them to '20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116531
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116531
Bug ID: 116531
Summary: Forward declaration with std::vector does not compile
with -O on arm
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
--- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan ---
The following should fix it:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanltranstree.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanltranstree.exp
index a7d4de3765f..3d85813ea2f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanltranstree.exp
+++ b/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116242
Bug 116242 depends on bug 116086, which changed state.
Bug 116086 Summary: RISC-V: Hash mismatch with vectorized 557.xz_r at zvl128b
and LMUL=m2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116086
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116086
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116086
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ff4875a79ccb302dc2401c32fe0af2187b61b99
commit r15-3282-g4ff4875a79ccb302dc2401c32fe0af2187b61b99
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Tue Au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
Testing a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116520
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > The issue seems to be that if-conversion isn't done:
>
> I wonder if this transformation is really beneficia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116506
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116520
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The issue seems to be that if-conversion isn't done:
>
> Can not ifcvt due to multiple exits
>
> maybe my patched dev tree arrives with a different CFG here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116520
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116522
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I also see with libgomp testing:
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix/
ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "scan-not ltrans-tree {f04 \\(x}
{[0-9][0-9][0-9]t.optimiz
ed} .ltrans0.ltrans" does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |ipa
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116518
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > ```
> > __builtin_memcpy (_25, &MEM[(const struct array *)&D.94502]._M_elems, 3);
> > D.94502 ={v} {CLOBBER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116518
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> ```
> __builtin_memcpy (_25, &MEM[(const struct array *)&D.94502]._M_elems, 3);
> D.94502 ={v} {CLOBBER(eos)};
> operator delete (_25, 3);
> ```
>
> The
83 matches
Mail list logo
