[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

2024-08-08 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #151 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #147) > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #145) > > Looks that some error occured durring configuring target libgomp. > Unfortunately

[Bug tree-optimization/116307] off by one when loop unrolling and bogus -Wstringop-overflow

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116307 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] off by one |off by one when loop

[Bug c++/103760] Invalid expression inside lambda inside compound requirement causes an error instead of concept satisfaction failure

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rekerner at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/116306] Compiler halts during negative case in requires statement when defining concept (unpacking variadic arguments)

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116306 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/116306] Compiler halts during negative case in requires statement when defining concept (unpacking variadic arguments)

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116306 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- So does MSVC.

[Bug c++/116306] Compiler halts during negative case in requires statement when defining concept (unpacking variadic arguments)

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116306 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- clang rejects it in the similar way.

[Bug c++/116306] Compiler halts during negative case in requires statement when defining concept (unpacking variadic arguments)

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116306 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 58885 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58885&action=edit testcase Next time please attach the full testcase rather than the code snippet and link to godbolt.

[Bug tree-optimization/116307] New: [14 Regression] off by one when loop unrolling and bogus -Wstringop-overflow

2024-08-08 Thread kasper93 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116307 Bug ID: 116307 Summary: [14 Regression] off by one when loop unrolling and bogus -Wstringop-overflow Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/116306] Compiler halts during negative case in requires statement when defining concept (unpacking variadic arguments)

2024-08-08 Thread rekerner at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116306 --- Comment #1 from Bob Kerner --- Note: I intended to submit this with the output of the GCC 14.2 compiler, but used 11 instead. The problem exists in GCC 14.2 as well.

[Bug c++/116306] New: Compiler halts during negative case in requires statement when defining concept (unpacking variadic arguments)

2024-08-08 Thread rekerner at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116306 Bug ID: 116306 Summary: Compiler halts during negative case in requires statement when defining concept (unpacking variadic arguments) Product: gcc Version: unkn

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

2024-08-08 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #150 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Now target libgcc and libstdc++v3 are built successfully with -O2 -mlra/-mno-lra. Next I'd like to look into c#140 after ongoing sh-elf binutils and gcc builds are done.

[Bug c++/115783] GCC accepts invalid program involving calling explicit object member function from static member function

2024-08-08 Thread cooky.ykooc922 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115783 Desmond Gold changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cooky.ykooc922 at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/113388] Calling explicit object member function without object argument inside a function that is not an implicit object member function

2024-08-08 Thread cooky.ykooc922 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113388 Desmond Gold changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/116305] New: RISC-V: dwarf cfi_escape information is incorrect when use vlenb to get scalable frame

2024-08-08 Thread zhijin.zeng at spacemit dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116305 Bug ID: 116305 Summary: RISC-V: dwarf cfi_escape information is incorrect when use vlenb to get scalable frame Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

2024-08-08 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #149 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 58883 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58883&action=edit a revised patch for c#129 and c#148

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

2024-08-08 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #148 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 58882 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58882&action=edit a testcase for c++ problem with the patch 58831 both for -mlra and -mno-lra sh.cc:sh_output_mi_thunk genera

[Bug other/116260] testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: split multilib ABIs in results

2024-08-08 Thread thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116260 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/116294] -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure when building duktape-2.7.0

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- I am going to redo the reduction and if the behavior of where the debug compare is different, I will file the first reduction seperately.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116294] -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure when building duktape-2.7.0

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the reduced testcase has undefined behavior in it ...

[Bug rtl-optimization/116294] -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure when building duktape-2.7.0

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/116294] -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure when building duktape-2.7.0

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Reduced: ``` double duk_js_execute_bytecode_duk__tv_0_0; double duk_double_div(); void duk_handle_call_unprotected(); void duk_js_execute_bytecode() { double du_0; long opcode_shifted; switch (opcode_shift

[Bug target/116303] RISC-V: -mcpu doesn't populate .attribute arch string when directly invoking cc1

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116303 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/116304] New: False negative from -fanalyzer on "return NULL"; due to NULL being in a system header

2024-08-08 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116304 Bug ID: 116304 Summary: False negative from -fanalyzer on "return NULL"; due to NULL being in a system header Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/116303] New: RISC-V: -mcpu doesn't populate .attribute arch string when directly invoking cc1

2024-08-08 Thread ewlu at rivosinc dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116303 Bug ID: 116303 Summary: RISC-V: -mcpu doesn't populate .attribute arch string when directly invoking cc1 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c/116302] transparent union does not work with {integral type, bitfield struct}

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116302 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- That is this is allowable: ``` unsigned long long f(unsigned long long v) { return antiop(v).v; } ``` But nothing else. That is even the return type is not transparent converable. Only arguments.

[Bug c/116302] transparent union does not work with {integral type, bitfield struct}

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116302 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

2024-08-08 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #147 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #145) Looks that some error occured durring configuring target libgomp. Unfortunately we can't see what is going on from that log. If /<>/build/sh4-li

[Bug c/116302] transparent union does not work with {integral type, bitfield struct}

2024-08-08 Thread hpa at zytor dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116302 --- Comment #2 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 58881 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58881&action=edit Error output Generated with: gcc -std=gnu17 -ggdb3 -O2 -Wattributes -Wall -Wextra -c transp.c

[Bug c/116302] transparent union does not work with {integral type, bitfield struct}

2024-08-08 Thread hpa at zytor dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116302 --- Comment #1 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 58880 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58880&action=edit Reproducer (preprocessed)

[Bug c/116302] New: transparent union does not work with {integral type, bitfield struct}

2024-08-08 Thread hpa at zytor dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116302 Bug ID: 116302 Summary: transparent union does not work with {integral type, bitfield struct} Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/116301] New: RFE: provide support for future SARIF versions

2024-08-08 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116301 Bug ID: 116301 Summary: RFE: provide support for future SARIF versions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug other/116300] New: RFE: capture macro expansion information in SARIF output

2024-08-08 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116300 Bug ID: 116300 Summary: RFE: capture macro expansion information in SARIF output Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: SARIF Se

[Bug middle-end/116299] GCC optimizes away code when long double is represented by the IBM double-double method.

2024-08-08 Thread rmaguire314 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116299 --- Comment #5 from Ryan --- Appending. Compiler Options: -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wconversion -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Winit-self -Wnull-dereference -Wwrit

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486

2024-08-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/116299] GCC optimizes away code when long double is represented by the IBM double-double method.

2024-08-08 Thread rmaguire314 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116299 --- Comment #4 from Ryan --- Ah, sure here you go. Output of gcc -v: gcc version 12.2.0 (Debian 12.2.0-14) Target: powerpc64le-linux-gnu Thread model: posix Output of uname -a: Linux Ryans-CotG 6.1.0-23-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116244] [15 Regression] reload ICE building libstdc++ for coldfire

2024-08-08 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116244 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A

[Bug middle-end/116299] GCC optimizes away code when long double is represented by the IBM double-double method.

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116299 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Please read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need .

[Bug middle-end/116299] GCC optimizes away code when long double is represented by the IBM double-double method.

2024-08-08 Thread rmaguire314 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116299 --- Comment #2 from Ryan --- It is a part of a rather large library. How much of it do you want? Here is the full function, in a working condition. /* TMPL_STATIC_INLINE macro found here. */ #include /*

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486

2024-08-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that the ICE also happens for other variable types (e.g. integer), and disappears for rank > 0. This works: program p character, allocatable :: buffer, dummy ! integer, allocatable :: b

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug ipa/116296] [15 Regression] internal compiler error: in merge, at ipa-modref-tree.cc:176 at -O3

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486

2024-08-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Breakpoint 1, build_function_decl (sym=0x3316310, global=global@entry=false) at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486 2486 gcc_assert (current_function_decl == NULL_TREE (gdb) l

[Bug middle-end/116299] GCC optimizes away code when long double is represented by the IBM double-double method.

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/116299] New: GCC optimizes away code when long double is represented by the IBM double-double method.

2024-08-08 Thread rmaguire314 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116299 Bug ID: 116299 Summary: GCC optimizes away code when long double is represented by the IBM double-double method. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486

2024-08-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08 Keyword

[Bug c++/116298] No error when taking address of overloaded function template

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/116298] No error when taking address of overloaded function template

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116298 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. Also happens with functions and not just member functions: ``` template E f() ;// #1 template E f() ;// #2 template E f(int) ; // #3 auto x = &f; ```

[Bug c++/116289] [13 regression] Can't apply decltype to comparison operators created by spaceship operator for local classes

2024-08-08 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/116298] New: No error when taking address of overloaded member function template

2024-08-08 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116298 Bug ID: 116298 Summary: No error when taking address of overloaded member function template Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/107637] [C++23] P2718R0 - Final Fix of Broken Range‐based for Loop

2024-08-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107637 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 58878 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58878&action=edit gcc15-pr107637-wip.patch Completely untested WIP patch, with which the above testcase now passes also in -std=

[Bug c++/116297] ICE on using default spaceship comparison operator inside requires

2024-08-08 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116297 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08 Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/116041] aarch64 fallout from removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116041 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Resolution|---

[Bug target/114189] Target implements obsolete vcond{,u,eq} expanders

2024-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114189 Bug 114189 depends on bug 116041, which changed state. Bug 116041 Summary: aarch64 fallout from removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116041 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486

2024-08-08 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug testsuite/116041] aarch64 fallout from removing vcond{,u,eq} patterns

2024-08-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116041 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1 commit r15-2840-g7223c64745530db102a160d5a1db4c2c8d2b9fe1 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tu

[Bug c++/116297] New: ICE on using default spaceship comparison operator inside requires

2024-08-08 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116297 Bug ID: 116297 Summary: ICE on using default spaceship comparison operator inside requires Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/116229] [15 Regression] wrong code at -Ofast aarch64 due to missing fneg to generate 0x8000000000000000

2024-08-08 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116229 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/116229] [15 Regression] wrong code at -Ofast aarch64 due to missing fneg to generate 0x8000000000000000

2024-08-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116229 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c24e0568392e51a77ebdaab629d631969ce8966 commit r15-2839-g2c24e0568392e51a77ebdaab629d631969ce8966 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug testsuite/116271] [15 regression] gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s176.c fails after r15-2777-g8fac69a2dbff98

2024-08-08 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried that patch and it seems to work just fine: make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s176.c" # of expected passes6

[Bug target/116295] [avr] unrecognizable insn when loading from address-space __flash

2024-08-08 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|15.0|14.3 Resolution|---

[Bug target/116295] [avr] unrecognizable insn when loading from address-space __flash

2024-08-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ca1d7a36abecee7da387ceb1c07d77eaad15927 commit r14-10573-g9ca1d7a36abecee7da387ceb1c07d77eaad15927 Author: Georg-Johan

[Bug target/116295] New: [avr] unrecognizable insn when loading from address-space __flash

2024-08-08 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295 Bug ID: 116295 Summary: [avr] unrecognizable insn when loading from address-space __flash Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/116295] [avr] unrecognizable insn when loading from address-space __flash

2024-08-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4d3dba253b49fb0e8e32109783f76453bc53653 commit r15-2838-gc4d3dba253b49fb0e8e32109783f76453bc53653 Author: Georg-Johann Lay Dat

[Bug c++/116289] [13 regression] Can't apply decltype to comparison operators created by spaceship operator for local classes

2024-08-08 Thread iamsupermouse at mail dot ru via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289 --- Comment #3 from Egor --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2) > r14-4140 ... doesn't seem suitable for backporting Fair enough. What's the procedure now, should I set status=resolved?

[Bug target/116295] [avr] unrecognizable insn when loading from address-space __flash

2024-08-08 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116295 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr-space, |

[Bug ipa/116296] New: [15 Regression] internal compiler error: in merge, at ipa-modref-tree.cc:176 at -O3

2024-08-08 Thread patrick at rivosinc dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296 Bug ID: 116296 Summary: [15 Regression] internal compiler error: in merge, at ipa-modref-tree.cc:176 at -O3 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug target/116174] [14/15 regression] Alignment request is added before endbr with -fcf-protection=branch since r15-888-gb644126237a1aa

2024-08-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 58876 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58876&action=edit A patch Here is a patch. Hongtao, please take a look and add a testcase. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/90839] Detect lsb ones counting loop (final value replacement?)

2024-08-08 Thread acarlotti at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90839 Andrew Carlotti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acarlotti at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/107637] [C++23] P2718R0 - Final Fix of Broken Range‐based for Loop

2024-08-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107637 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Adjusted testcase so that it also verifies what is destructed first, S vs. T in the various cases and standards: // P2718R0 - Wording for P2644R1 Fix for Range-based for Loop // { dg-do run { target c++11 }

[Bug ipa/96265] offloading to nvptx-none from aarch64-linux-gnu (and riscv*-linux-gnu) does not work

2024-08-08 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265 --- Comment #11 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi, Yes, those two errors are expected. I posted RFC discussion about AArch64/nvptx offloading issues here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2024-July/244466.html For the unrecognized co

[Bug target/116283] [15 Regression] RISC-V rv64id_zbs ICE: unrecognizable insn

2024-08-08 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Code is a bit nonsensical in that it masks a shift by a crazy value (3629), but the underlying bug is real. Ultimately we're going to rely on the fact that hardware truncates the count (mask with 0x3f) and

[Bug ipa/96265] offloading to nvptx-none from aarch64-linux-gnu (and riscv*-linux-gnu) does not work

2024-08-08 Thread j.reuter--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265 --- Comment #10 from Jan André Reuter --- Created attachment 58875 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58875&action=edit Verbose compile output after rebuilding the latest GCC snapshot with the patch applied New error message wh

[Bug ipa/96265] offloading to nvptx-none from aarch64-linux-gnu (and riscv*-linux-gnu) does not work

2024-08-08 Thread j.reuter--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265 --- Comment #9 from Jan André Reuter --- Thanks a lot for the patch Prathamesh Kulkarni. There seems to be some progress, which is great to see! I've tried your patch. I applied it to the latest snapshot and also to GCC 14.2.0 and GCC 14.1.0 to

[Bug middle-end/116294] -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure when building duktape-2.7.0

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Created attachment 58874 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58874&action=edit libduktaped.so.207.20700-duktape.i.xz

[Bug middle-end/116294] -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure when building duktape-2.7.0

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116294 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- I'm reducing it.

[Bug middle-end/116294] New: -O2 -gno-statement-frontiers -fcompare-debug failure when building duktape-2.7.0

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
3 bootstrap-lto' Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental) 4d44f3fc387815eb232d7757352857993a1d21d9 (Gentoo 15.0. p, commit 767d91209f8983d23caae12e2337eca6c2b5dbdb) ```

[Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation)

2024-08-08 Thread simartin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 --- Comment #4 from Simon Martin --- This started to fail with https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=557831a91df947b447fc9fd94ecad02470a3c86a

[Bug target/116283] [15 Regression] RISC-V rv64id_zbs ICE: unrecognizable insn

2024-08-08 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

2024-08-08 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #146 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #145) > There is no real error message coming from the compiler itself though. Maybe > the patches don't fully work with gcc-14? Same problem

[Bug rtl-optimization/116028] [15 regression] gcc.dg/pr10474.c test failure since r15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf593

2024-08-08 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028 Surya Kumari Jangala changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug tree-optimization/116166] [13/14 Regression] risc-v (last) insn-emit-nn.c build takes hours

2024-08-08 Thread andi at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166 --- Comment #29 from andi at firstfloor dot org --- > It might be interesting to have statistics on function sizes in > insn-recog.cc to see if there's any outliers - if it's just very many > there's nothing to do but split the file up. Or LTO d

[Bug c++/116293] New: ICE when failing to open module mapper (error: unknown Compiled Module Interface: no such module)

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
27; Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental) 4d44f3fc387815eb232d7757352857993a1d21d9 (Gentoo 15.0. p, commit 767d91209f8983d23caae12e2337eca6c2b5dbdb) ```

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:2486

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid,| |ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation)

2024-08-08 Thread simartin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 Simon Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |simartin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/116292] [15 regression] ICE on invalid reduction

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- It's also accepted by <15.

[Bug fortran/116292] New: [15 regression] ICE on invalid reduction

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116292 Bug ID: 116292 Summary: [15 regression] ICE on invalid reduction Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/116291] New: ICE on non-existent module-mapper directory

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
sl --enable-default-pie --enable-host-pie --disable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto' Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental) 4d44f3fc387815e

[Bug target/116240] RISC-V: ICE during RTL pass: combine with -fwrapv -march=rv64imv_xtheadcondmov_xventanacondops at -O2

2024-08-08 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116240 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/116240] RISC-V: ICE during RTL pass: combine with -fwrapv -march=rv64imv_xtheadcondmov_xventanacondops at -O2

2024-08-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116240 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:190ad81282057b0e5884fd30a7270356b9b1 commit r15-2821-g190ad81282057b0e5884fd30a7270356b9b1 Author: Jeff Law Date: Thu Aug 8 0

[Bug c++/116289] [13 regression] Can't apply decltype to comparison operators created by spaceship operator for local classes

2024-08-08 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116289 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Key

[Bug middle-end/116290] [12/13/14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

2024-08-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/116290] [12/13/14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

2024-08-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looks like ivopts. In message_info_load, ivopts dumps are the first ones to contain differences like [local count: 955630198]: - # _172 = PHI <_32(59), 0(56)> # _173 = PHI <_33(59), label_117(56)>

[Bug middle-end/116290] [12/13/14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Reduced: ``` char *camel_message_info_class_intern_init_part; void g_once_init_enter(); void camel_message_info_class_intern_init() { int ii; char *label; for (; camel_message_info_class_intern_init_part[i

[Bug middle-end/116290] [12/13/14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

2024-08-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/116290] [12/13/14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116290 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- ``` @@ -37036,13 +37036,20 @@ (int_list:REG_BR_PROB 118111604 (nil))) -> 1416) (note # 0 0 [bb 12] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) -(insn:TI # 0 0 12 (set (reg/v/f:DI 4 si [orig:140 label ] [140]) -(r

[Bug middle-end/116290] New: [12/13/14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers -O2 failure with evolution-data-server-3.52.4

2024-08-08 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
read model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 15.0.0 20240808 (experimental) 4d44f3fc387815eb232d7757352857993a1d21d9 (Gentoo 15.0. p, commit 767d91209f8983d23caae12e2337eca6c2b5dbdb) ```

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2024-08-08 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 115062, which changed state. Bug 115062 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: in simplify_aggr_init_exp https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115062 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/115062] [modules] internal compiler error: in simplify_aggr_init_exp

2024-08-08 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115062 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nshead at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/115062] [modules] internal compiler error: in simplify_aggr_init_exp

2024-08-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115062 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71aebb36174c194231da5f9c7c23f81dbb082ca4 commit r15-2819-g71aebb36174c194231da5f9c7c23f81dbb082ca4 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/115239] [14 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with ambiguous function call in some cases (`const char*` vs `char` with `long` vs `unsigned`) since r14-6522

2024-08-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hans.buchmann.wantuch@gmail

  1   2   >