[Bug middle-end/114700] middle-end optimization generates causes -fsanitize=undefined not to happen in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114700 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Hu Lin from comment #17) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > > (In reply to Hu Lin from comment #11) > > > I think it doesn't mean that's not a bug with -ftrapv, it should preserve

[Bug target/111231] [12/13/14 regression] armhf: Miscompilation with -O2/-fno-exceptions level (-fno-tree-vectorize is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231 --- Comment #30 from Richard Biener --- I have tested the following since that might confuse the redundant store removal sanity checks. It bootstraps fine on x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu but causes FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-36.c scan-tree-dump

[Bug gcov-profile/114715] New: Gcov allocates branches to wrong row for nested switches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114715 Bug ID: 114715 Summary: Gcov allocates branches to wrong row for nested switches Product: gcc Version: 11.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug rust/113499] crab1 fails to link when configuring with --disable-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113499 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Arthur Cohen from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #4) > > > If I understood Arthur correctly, GCC/Rust is going to effec

[Bug c/65672] type attribute "aligned" can decrease alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65672 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Note I see Martin has argued both ways :). Anyways I the issue is in reconstruct_complex_type (either cp_reconstruct_complex_type in gcc/cp/decl2.cc or reconstruct_complex_type in gcc/tree.cc).

[Bug c/65672] type attribute "aligned" can decrease alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65672 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 89950 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/89950] attribute aligned ignored with attribute vector_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89950 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/65672] type attribute "aligned" can decrease alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65672 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c/89950] attribute aligned ignored with attribute vector_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89950 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/65672] type attribute "aligned" can decrease alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65672 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89950 ***

[Bug middle-end/114700] middle-end optimization generates causes -fsanitize=undefined not to happen in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114700 --- Comment #17 from Hu Lin --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > (In reply to Hu Lin from comment #11) > > I think it doesn't mean that's not a bug with -ftrapv, it should preserve > > all overflow traps. Because it doesn't work, w

[Bug target/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.2.0, 7.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug target/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov --- Co

[Bug target/77344] Internal Compiler Error with arch knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77344 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/114714] [RISC-V][RVV] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints (postreload)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114714 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #1 from L

[Bug c++/71333] Broken Python extension produced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71333 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/71646] incompability between ptx code and GPU hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71646 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- sm_30 is definitely the min target for offloading for GCC to nvptx . What I don't know if `nvidia geforce gt 430` support is still existant in cuda. Maybe someone who knows the offloading support for Nvidia

[Bug bootstrap/32497] (const_int INT_MIN) can cause warnings to show up while building insn-emit.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32497 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Crosscomiling native sh3|(const_int INT_MIN) can

[Bug testsuite/49375] Target libstdc++.so used by host cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49375 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- ppl support was removed with r0-117618-g33ad93b9f4cb21 for GCC 4.8.0. I Have not looked if ISL requires libstdc++ or is only statically linked yet.

[Bug debug/47292] Violation of DWARF-3 spec for DW_FORM_strp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski --- Note libgcc uses t-gthr-noweak to get the define.

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||*-*-netbsd --- Comment #18 from Andrew P

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug bootstrap/51450] configure's test for -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51450 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- configure:18495: checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions configure:18513: gcc -c -g -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions conftest.c >&5 cc1: warning: command-line option '-fno-rtti' is valid for C++/D/ObjC+

[Bug bootstrap/56623] Can't build GCC due to tar: ./ssl: Cannot utime: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56623 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug gcov-profile/114115] xz-utils segfaults when built with -fprofile-generate (bad interaction between IFUNC and binding?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114115 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #15) > > Fixed for GCC 14 so far > It is simple patch, so backporting is OK after a week in mainline. These are patches which I am backporting: https://patchwork.sourceware

[Bug target/114656] [15 Regression] ~5% slowdown of 538.imagick_r on aarch64 since r14-9692

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114656 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/114393] [14 regression] over eager "invalid use of void expression" ? since r14-2170-g4cf64d9cc2faf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114393 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Welche --- Thank you! $ /usr/local/gcc/bin/g++ --version g++ (GCC) 14.0.1 20240414 (experimental) $ ./readme_ex 0 1 4

[Bug c++/103511] __builtin_bit_cast requires a constructor call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103511 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-14 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug libfortran/114618] Format produces incorrect output when contains 1x, ok when uses " "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW Depends on|

[Bug libfortran/114618] Format produces incorrect output when contains 1x, ok when uses " "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/106820] [modules] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility with modules and weakref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106820 --- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a0ef0d02cbb74cd865c1db2ecb7ca1b11f87cd commit r14-9959-g62a0ef0d02cbb74cd865c1db2ecb7ca1b11f87cd Author: Nathaniel Shead Da

[Bug target/114714] New: [RISC-V][RVV] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints (postreload)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114714 Bug ID: 114714 Summary: [RISC-V][RVV] ICE: insn does not satisfy its constraints (postreload) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-v

[Bug lto/114713] New: incorrect TBAA for struct with flexible array member or GNU zero size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114713 Bug ID: 114713 Summary: incorrect TBAA for struct with flexible array member or GNU zero size Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c/90253] no warning for cv-qualified selectors in _Generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90253 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/109802] [13 Regression] ICE using dubious flexible arrays in unions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109802 --- Comment #6 from Alejandro Colomar --- Thanks for fixing it! Would you mind showing which commit fixed this? I'm curious about it. I searched in the git log, but nothing mentioned this bug number. Now I can come to my original intent, whi

[Bug c++/95455] ICE in capture with initializer in requires block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95455 Egor Pugin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egor.pugin at gmail dot com --- Comment #6