https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112909
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112914
--- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl ---
The options are -O2 LTO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112915
--- Comment #2 from Filip Kastl ---
The options are -Ofast -march=native -mtune=native LTO and PGO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112916
Bug ID: 112916
Summary: [14 Regression] ~4-7% exec time regression of 433.milc
on AMD Zen2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs-bisec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66261
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pcordes at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112915
--- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl ---
I checked again and its actually a 4% regression on both machines, my bad.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112915
Bug ID: 112915
Summary: [14 Regression] ~4-11% exec time regression of
454.calculix on AMD Zen2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112914
Bug ID: 112914
Summary: [14 Regression] ~7-9% exec time regression of
436.cactusADM on AMD Zen2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112411
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39a1ab9c33b6067b1cc843408886e7ba709fbb62
commit r14-6302-g39a1ab9c33b6067b1cc843408886e7ba709fbb62
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112913
Bug ID: 112913
Summary: ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at
lra-constraints.cc:4308
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112910
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There's also size_type_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112909
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112912
--- Comment #5 from Wang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Again bugzilla is not the right place to ask this kind of question, gcc@ is
> a better place.
>
> Refactoring and sharing the mangling code definitely can be done. I sus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112912
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Again bugzilla is not the right place to ask this kind of question, gcc@ is a
better place.
Refactoring and sharing the mangling code definitely can be done. I suspect the
first step is to move away from us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112912
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112912
--- Comment #2 from Wang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't get why you need to mangle anything here
>
> what exactly is being mangled here? The types? or something else?
Sorry I didn't describe it clearly. I just n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112912
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't get why you need to mangle anything here
what exactly is being mangled here? The types? or something else?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112912
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112912
Bug ID: 112912
Summary: How to implement a mangle interface in c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112911
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-08
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112911
Bug ID: 112911
Summary: Problem creating aggregate constants containing a
variant record
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112774
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7
commit r14-6299-g2efe3a7de0107618397264017fb045f237764cc7
Author: Hao Liu
Date: Wed Dec 6 14:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112758
--- Comment #2 from gyumin ---
Dear GCC Development Team,
I recently reported an inconsistency in the GCC compiler (RISC-V 64 version
14.0.0) involving bitwise AND operations between int and long long int
variables. This issue, which occurs und
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112904
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao Liu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112889
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Should be fixed on trunk by the above patch.
Keeping open to backport to older releases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112889
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:775aeabcb870b74e4d0986341c7a39add9bbb06d
commit r14-6297-g775aeabcb870b74e4d0986341c7a39add9bbb06d
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Can't we make sure to pass -mno-any (if that exists...) during bootstrap
> and testsuite instead?
-mno-any does not exist.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111503
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 56832
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56832&action=edit
Draft patch
The attached patch adds handling for NULL([MOLD]) and fixes comment#0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112910
--- Comment #1 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 56831
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56831&action=edit
Patch fixing this bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112488
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112910
Bug ID: 112910
Summary: Getting the size of the type size_t returns the wrong
value on some platforms
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112909
Bug ID: 112909
Summary: [14 Regression] glibc -Wuninitialized build failure
for i686-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112906
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112908
Bug ID: 112908
Summary: __reference_{converts,constructs}_from_temporary
checks for move constructor when binding prvalue to
reference of the same type
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> https://wg21.link/P2693R1 formatting thread::id and stacktrace
This has been implemented for gcc-14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> https://wg21.link/P2372R3 formatting ranges
Oops, that should be https://wg21.link/p2286r8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105170
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-07
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112894
Bug 112894 depends on bug 112882, which changed state.
Bug 112882 Summary: [14 Regression] std::clamp no longer usable in header only
mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112882
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112882
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112882
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1395c573c523762957bde8c2a08832c5f4350815
commit r14-6291-g1395c573c523762957bde8c2a08832c5f4350815
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 07:59:25PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
>
> --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve Karg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-07
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 09:58:18PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > In your experience, how good (or bad) is a naive inline version
> > like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101926
Bug 101926 depends on bug 109391, which changed state.
Bug 109391 Summary: Inefficient codegen on AArch64 when structure types are
returned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109391
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109391
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106694
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109078
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109391
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f0f7d802482a8958d6cdc72f1fe0c8549db2182
commit r14-6290-g9f0f7d802482a8958d6cdc72f1fe0c8549db2182
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106694
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f0f7d802482a8958d6cdc72f1fe0c8549db2182
commit r14-6290-g9f0f7d802482a8958d6cdc72f1fe0c8549db2182
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109078
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f0f7d802482a8958d6cdc72f1fe0c8549db2182
commit r14-6290-g9f0f7d802482a8958d6cdc72f1fe0c8549db2182
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-07
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112905
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112869
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112907
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
-march isn't needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 09:58:18PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
>
> anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
sable-host-bind-now
--enable-default-ssp --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231207 (experimental)
ae9e48e5c0acaecf181117bdf3632b6eabf907ec (Gentoo 14.0.0 p, commit
185baffd2265d79d52d9c42050ecdf9239195923)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112891
--- Comment #4 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #2)
> So it looks like we need to handle ix86_avx_u128_mode_after
>
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> @@ -15177,7 +15177,14 @@ ix86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112902
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
b.0_1 = b;
_2 = -b.0_1;
_3 = (unsigned _BitInt(512)) _2;
a.1_4 = a;
a.2_5 = (unsigned _BitInt(512)) a.1_4;
_6 = _3 * a.2_5;
_7 = (_BitInt(512)) _6;
_11 = .MUL_OVERFLOW (_7, 40);
_8 = IMAGPA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112906
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] aarch64:|[14 Regression] aarch64:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Agostino Sarubbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112906
Bug ID: 112906
Summary: [14 Regression] aarch64: ICE with SVE ACLE code at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112894
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112895
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-07
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112901
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-07
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112903
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in extract_insn, at |[14 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112905
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112893
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112893
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8c8aebc597611b8d37edce165a891d00e23a9c1
commit r14-6271-gf8c8aebc597611b8d37edce165a891d00e23a9c1
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112893
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56822|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112905
Bug ID: 112905
Summary: [missed optimization] fail to reduce a loop that
increments two locations of the same buffer
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
e --prefix=/home/mjires/built/master
--disable-bootstrap --enable-checking --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231207 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112903
Bug ID: 112903
Summary: ICE: in df_scan_verify, at df-scan.cc:4239 with -O
-fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #0)
> Fedora (there are other unrelated patches):
> https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/
> Everything/source/tree/Packages/g/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
--- Comment #2 from Agostino Sarubbo ---
I don't know if I was able to provide the concept, but in other words if we
know that something like -fstack-clash-protection is widely used nowadays, it
make no sense rebase patches for 10 years and then
ecking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231207 (experimental) (GCC)
tl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231207 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112635
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
We don't want people go wild with changing defaults and delivering a totally
different (bad?) experience or doing that too easily.
You can always use specs to do this for example.
But yeah, SUSE carries a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112900
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think at least fold has/had some of this folding one variant into the other.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
Just to clarify, the case where this causes us problems is (indeed on Aarch64)
with option -fpatchable-function-entry (and NOT necessarily -flive-patching).
But I agree that a separate orthogonal option for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112900
Bug ID: 112900
Summary: Missing optimization: canonicalize `select c, x - 1, x
+ 1` to `x + (select c, -1, 1)` (or reversely)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112899
Bug ID: 112899
Summary: odr-using constexpr static data member of class
exported from module results in linker error
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|11.5
Summary|[12/13/14 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112882
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The original effect of --disable-libstdcxx-verbose was to change the default
std::terminate handler, which is a configure-time property.
But it's now also used to decide whether to use the verbose asserti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111965
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
