https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110691
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Created attachment 55560
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55560&action=edit
Shorter reproducer that gives bogus entries.
This shorter reproducer gives (with gfortran 11.3) bogus output,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 95923, which changed state.
Bug 95923 Summary: Failure to optimize bool checks into and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95923
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95923
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0407ae8a7732d90622a65ddf1798c9d51d450e9d
commit r14-2556-g0407ae8a7732d90622a65ddf1798c9d51d450e9d
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110697
Bug ID: 110697
Summary: [14 Regression] bootstrap failure on
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #0)
> Seen here:
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/CPP/graph?plot.0=288.597.8
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/CPP/graph?plot.0=468.597.8
> https://lnt.open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110666
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d20e542ecd8cfc009b120f9e432caeb7005e7c53
commit r14-2554-gd20e542ecd8cfc009b120f9e432caeb7005e7c53
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110696
Bug ID: 110696
Summary: RISC-V: -march doesn't imply correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110671
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105132
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lehua.ding at rivai dot ai
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110695
Bug ID: 110695
Summary: RISC-V: compile gcc.dg/torture/pr105132.c crash
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109971
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110694
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110694
Bug ID: 110694
Summary: False Positive -Werror=free-nonheap-object
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110693
Bug ID: 110693
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95923
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I will fix the phiopt issue later ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95923
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 8
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:061f74c06735e1fa35b910ae0bcf01b61a74ec23
commit r14-2546-g061f74c06735e1fa35b910ae0bcf01b61a74ec23
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c62791fa413a49fc6476ce186b324250f8ae6d40
commit r14-2545-gc62791fa413a49fc6476ce186b324250f8ae6d40
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d203d4c90adb064edfa9680768d1f83a41f17e0
commit r14-2544-g1d203d4c90adb064edfa9680768d1f83a41f17e0
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110658
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-July/059620.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I found the problem why vectorizer gets vectorized epilogue profile scales
wrong. It is scale_profile_for_vect_loop that uses niter_for_unrolled_loop
which does not understand the fact that if iteration count
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110658
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110692
Bug ID: 110692
Summary: epilogues for loop which can be also vectorized with
half size can be improved.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110691
Bug ID: 110691
Summary: Segmentation fault on valid F2018 code
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
I tried zen3 with -march=native -Ofast
Samples: 1M of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 2309002237334, DSO: s
Overhead Command Symbol
42.51% sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104871
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68360
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91520
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
>--enable-host-shared
Why are you using that option?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110683
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
ms.c:299:24: warning: taking address of packed member of 'union U1' may result
in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irip at qq dot com
--- Comment #7 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110685
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110690
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68604
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irip at qq dot com
--- Comment #4 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110690
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is the proper testcase:
```
#include
struct S {
int m;
static void f_sizeof() { (void) sizeof(m); }
static void f_typeid() { (void) typeid(decltype(m)); }
struct N {
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110689
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Testcase that is complete:
```
#include
struct M {
operator char() { return 'a'; }
} m;
int flag;
struct S {
S(std::initializer_list) { flag = 1; }
S(std::initializer_list) { flag = 2;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110683
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to CTC from comment #3)
> The reduced program is
>
> # cat mss.i
> struct a {
> char b;
> int c;
> };
> union {
> struct a b;
> short c;
> } d = {8, 1};
> void main() { printf("%d\n", d.c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110683
--- Comment #3 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
The reduced program is
# cat mss.i
struct a {
char b;
int c;
};
union {
struct a b;
short c;
} d = {8, 1};
void main() { printf("%d\n", d.c); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110690
Bug ID: 110690
Summary: invalid use of member 'S::m' in static member function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110689
Bug ID: 110689
Summary: problem of initializer list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110688
Bug ID: 110688
Summary: problem with templates typename
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110687
Bug ID: 110687
Summary: problem with class template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110686
Bug ID: 110686
Summary: problem with explicit
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #4 from AlexK ---
where in Makefile gcc copies compiled libs from prev-* stage1 to lib* in stage2
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110685
Bug ID: 110685
Summary: problem with volatile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #3 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 6
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6&action=edit
My system - Linux Mint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #2 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 5
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5&action=edit
C cannot find libraries from stage1 (they are in prev- folders)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110683
--- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
The reduced optimizations is -O2 -fpack-struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #1 from AlexK ---
Created attachment 4
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4&action=edit
stage1 success config.log
mybuild/config.log at successful stage1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
Bug ID: 110684
Summary: unknown spec function ‘dumps’ error, C compiler cannot
create executables
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110683
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 2
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110683
Bug ID: 110683
Summary: wrong code with '-O2' and specific optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68360
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-11-16 00:00:00 |2023-7-16
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97756
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> This seems to be improved on trunk ...
gcc is down to 37 instructions now for the original test case with -O3.
icc, which appears to be best, has 33, see https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110682
Bug ID: 110682
Summary: GCC, ICE: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr,
at gimplify.cc:16771
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
68 matches
Mail list logo
