https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110206
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
v2 patch at [1].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624491.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110660
--- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The vectorizer itself could do the merging which means it could also more
> accurately cost things.
>
It's similar with ARM SVE:
https://godbolt.org/z/8cn5j1zTr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110662
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110662
--- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
The reduced sequence is -O3 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-sink
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110660
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The vectorizer itself could do the merging which means it could also more
accurately cost things.
Otherwise think about whether/how such a situation might arise from people
using RVV intrinsics - how are t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #8 from R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110662
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55540
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55540&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110662
Bug ID: 110662
Summary: Segmentation fault with '-O3'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
--- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin ---
I can't reproduce this on ppc64le with both the default bootstrapping checking
option --enable-checking=yes,extra and the reported --enable-checking=release.
I'm going to test it on cfarm x86 machine.
If the er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
--- Comment #7 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> GCC 13 won't build with anything older than GCC 4.8.x as documented at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html (which is right now for the
> trunk but t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Oleg Endo
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef4b6d29d9801c970bee1b3e8675b19ef5f61d2a
commit r13-7563-gef4b6d29d9801c970bee1b3e8675b19ef5f61d2a
Author: Oleg Endo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110661
Bug ID: 110661
Summary: Weird handing for deleting a void* pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110660
Bug ID: 110660
Summary: conditional length reduction optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Oleg Endo
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f20f736c1144dd9f2ae2f99099b7f7b21a3ab4e
commit r12-9772-g5f20f736c1144dd9f2ae2f99099b7f7b21a3ab4e
Author: Oleg Endo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Oleg Endo
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75b8353e4b61566f7e8ac627204e2bcd6bfe60a6
commit r11-10909-g75b8353e4b61566f7e8ac627204e2bcd6bfe60a6
Author: Oleg Endo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Oleg Endo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dbb3af1efe55174a714d15c2994cf2842ef8c28
commit r14-2511-g4dbb3af1efe55174a714d15c2994cf2842ef8c28
Author: Oleg Endo
Date: Fri Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 2:16 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2023-07-13 1:57 p.m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #101 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #100)
> Created attachment 55513 [details]
> Arithmetic right shift late expanding
>
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #99)
> > Meanwhile, here's my iteration o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
--- Comment #4 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Looks like `combine' is generating paradoxical subregs of mems, which seem to
confuse LRA and these weird incorrect reloads end up being generated. The
easiest fix for this is to make the backend to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109112
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
In an email thread Jakub wrote:
Only the simplest assumptions in [[assume(cond)]] where there clearly aren't
any
side-effects no risks of them are lowered to if (!cond) __builtin_unreachable
();
in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96050
--- Comment #1 from pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There certainly are some missing earlyclobbers in the MD file. Someone else
reported bad code from this and a patch to add the missing "&" fixed those.
Curious that it doesn't for your test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103806
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103801
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96945
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103801
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107841
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|AS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107841
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Koning :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f1a26ee259f72e42405b9c5f2b161042ec4014b
commit r14-2509-g8f1a26ee259f72e42405b9c5f2b161042ec4014b
Author: Mikael Pettersson
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC 13 won't build with anything older than GCC 4.8.x as documented at
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html (which is right now for the
trunk but that requirement has not changed yet).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
--- Comment #5 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> What compiler did you start with?
> That is what is the output of `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -v` ?
[user@60947d0cbd04 ~]$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -v
bash: x86_64-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110618
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-13
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
--- Comment #4 from Rich Townsend ---
Someone else seems to have the same problem:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76375244/how-can-i-resolve-a-ld-eh-frame-hdr-refers-to-overlapping-fdes-error-during
...although there is no fix suggested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-13
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
What compiler did you start with?
That is what is the output of `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -v` ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
--- Comment #1 from Rich Townsend ---
I should add that this is on CentOS 5.11, running inside a Docker container.
This ships with a very old binutils, so before trying to compile gcc I
installed binutils 2.40 (built from source with --disable-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:616a101848bfd5b61ffdd87ae9b1153139d916ca
commit r14-2507-g616a101848bfd5b61ffdd87ae9b1153139d916ca
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659
Bug ID: 110659
Summary: Error from linker: .eh_frame_hdr refers to overlapping
FDEs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110624
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110624
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:032b5da1fc781bd3c23d9caa72fb09439e7f6f3a
commit r14-2506-g032b5da1fc781bd3c23d9caa72fb09439e7f6f3a
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0, 13.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110619
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||natattak at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93719
--- Comment #1 from pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This works with -mlra, so given the deprecation of old reload the right answer
seems to be to close this as fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106570
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101240
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is a better testcase:
```
int test_array(unsigned (&a)[3]) {
int t = (a[0]+a[1]+a[2]);
ALWAYS_TRUE(a[0] < a[1] && a[1] < a[2]);
return (a[0] < a[2])+t;
}
```
(just to make sure VRP is only dealing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110658
Bug ID: 110658
Summary: MINVAL/MAXVAL and deferred-length character arrays
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 1:57 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> ./hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h:4161:36: error:
> 'strtold' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108953
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jengelh at inai dot de
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59172
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59178
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55530|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 1:09 p.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I'm testing this, which should define std::stof and std::stold for hpux11.11:
>
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
> +++ b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107841
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-13
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110206
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 55537
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55537&action=edit
Proposed patch.
v2 patch in testing.
This version prevents emission of invalid REG_EQUAL note in
cprop.cc/try_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fix for FINDLOC also fixes the same regression for MINLOC, MAXLOC.
There is another issue for MINVAL and MAXVAL that exists already in
10-branch, thus not a regression. I get at runtime:
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78710
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3)
> On 2023-07-13 9:46 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Dave, does this patch work for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 ?
> Yes.
Great - pushed to trunk.
> On hpux, dou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1d12752f8d45df5d7962cef6e2a87585002e982
commit r14-2504-ga1d12752f8d45df5d7962cef6e2a87585002e982
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106966
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106966
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4520e2dbc73262028ad556f732871565101ef615
commit r12-9770-g4520e2dbc73262028ad556f732871565101ef615
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106966
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27e421319efcf47280339fbc17c263f36c92eee6
commit r13-7561-g27e421319efcf47280339fbc17c263f36c92eee6
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106966
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337649c1660211db733c1ba34ae260b8c66a3578
commit r14-2503-g337649c1660211db733c1ba34ae260b8c66a3578
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110655
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |preprocessor
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110654
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
libccp has:
/* In C++, this is an error for invalid character in an identifier
because logically, the UTF-8 was converted to a UCN during
translation phase 1 (even though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
--- Comment #2 from Kris Van Hees ---
Created attachment 55536
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55536&action=edit
Pre-processed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
Jose E. Marchesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jemarch at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110657
Bug ID: 110657
Summary: BPF verifier rejects generated code due to invalid
stack access
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
new_temp does look like it is initialized on the !costing_p path too ..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2023-07-13 9:46 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Created attachment 55534
>--> htt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109112
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109112
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110293
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Half of this is fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110539
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110539
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:285c9d042e90a7425b37697edc9ec93a1b03b486
commit r14-2501-g285c9d042e90a7425b37697edc9ec93a1b03b486
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110293
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:285c9d042e90a7425b37697edc9ec93a1b03b486
commit r14-2501-g285c9d042e90a7425b37697edc9ec93a1b03b486
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109520
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b175b4887f928118af997f6d4d75097a64dcec5d
commit r14-2500-gb175b4887f928118af997f6d4d75097a64dcec5d
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110656
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 55534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55534&action=edit
libstdc++: std::stoi etc. do not need C99 support
Dave, does this patch work for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 ?
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106966
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Klose ---
search for "test-summary"
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gcc-12&arch=alpha
12.3.0-5 is gcc-12 branch 20230630
12.3.0-6 is gcc-12 branch 20230707 with the proposed patch applied
comparing g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> -fdump-tree-all-blocks-details produced more than 100 dump files. Which
> one(s)
> do you want?
Can you just zip them an attach all?
Thank you!
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110656
Bug ID: 110656
Summary: Floating point to char/short or bitfield conversions
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110655
Bug ID: 110655
Summary: incorrect position of indicator in error message
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110654
Bug ID: 110654
Summary: inconsistent error message in presence of unexpected
encoded characters
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110646
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I'll split out the checks needed for std::stoi etc.
See Bug 110653 for the library improvements.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110653
Bug ID: 110653
Summary: Support std::stoi etc. without C99 APIs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110651
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>> When bootstrapping current trunk on macOS 14.0 beta 3 with Xcode 15 beta 4,
>> every single fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110651
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> When bootstrapping current trunk on macOS 14.0 beta 3 with Xcode 15 beta 4,
> every single fortran link test FAILs like
> * Get rid of %(libgcc) in libgfortran.spec
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
