https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110539
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pins...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:285c9d042e90a7425b37697edc9ec93a1b03b486 commit r14-2501-g285c9d042e90a7425b37697edc9ec93a1b03b486 Author: Andrew Pinski <apin...@marvell.com> Date: Wed Jul 12 00:33:14 2023 -0700 Fix part of PR 110293: `A NEEQ (A NEEQ CST)` part This fixes part of PR 110293, for the outer comparison case being `!=` or `==`. In turn PR 110539 is able to be optimized again as the if statement for `(a&1) == ((a & 1) != 0)` gets optimized to `false` early enough to allow FRE/DOM to do a CSE for memory store/load. OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux with no regressions. gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/110293 PR tree-optimization/110539 * match.pd: Expand the `x != (typeof x)(x == 0)` pattern to handle where the inner and outer comparsions are either `!=` or `==` and handle other constants than 0. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr110293-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr110539-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr110539-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr110539-3.c: New test. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr110539-4.c: New test.
