https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107952
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107952
>
> --- Comment #19 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to rguent...@sus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Thanks, now when PR108555 is fixed the diagnostic should go away again anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608
--- Comment #45 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #44)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #43)
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with different snapshots, last confirmed with 20230126 on mipsel-linux-gnu
(mips64el-linux-gnu bootstrap works):
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/rust/rust
Hello gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In response to the current system maintenance process and
security update ongoing, we couldn't validate the authenticity of
your email account.
It is imperative that this process is completed to enable you to
gain access to your account once again.
Please confirm th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108332
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils-cvs/2021-March/056031.html
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
I doubt this is the issue with ld linker.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this is using a GCC extension so this might not be as important.
clang mangles the symbol as:
_Z5dummyIXtl8wrapper1IdEtlNS1_Ut_Edi9RightNametlNS2_Ut_ELd405ec000EEvv
Which does demangle to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
--- Comment #40 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Chenghua Xu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:476efe839e069e556b4b03cf6ec8c18870867960
commit r13-5424-g476efe839e069e556b4b03cf6ec8c18870867960
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE: |ICE: tree check: expected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
Bug ID: 108566
Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree
that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have
'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
There are 162 marked as ice-on-valid-code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Doing the search in bugzilla, 137 bugs are marked as ic-on-invalid-code. I
suggest we make all of these P5 or Wont fix.
As my time and others is scarce, I plan to focus on the valid-code bugs. This
one was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The only other way would be some sort of built in memory management scheme that
would guarantee all "objects" are freed implicitly. Of course gfortran itself
implements this type of thing as does I think C+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87512
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108550
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.2.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108550
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108550
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Slightly reduced:
```
#include
struct unique_ptr
{
int operator->(){return true;};
};
template
constexpr auto is_pointer_v = std::is_pointer::value;
template
auto Wrap1(int) -> std::integral_consta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108565
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Comment #12 from palmer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've got a somewhat recently rebased version of Patrick's patch floating
around, it passed testing but I got hung up on the futex_time64 thing and
forgot about it. Not sure if folks think it's t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108565
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The missed optimization is because we don't optimize:
MEM[(int *)_28] = 2;
_8 = operator new (4);
[local count: 1073741825]:
MEM[(int *)_8] = 20;
MEM[(int *)_8] ={v} {CLOBBER};
operator delete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108565
Bug ID: 108565
Summary: -Wuse-after-free false positive on a shared_ptr
implementation triggered by -O2
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108564
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
RISCV does not support subword atomics yet except via libatomic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
Known to fail|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108564
Bug ID: 108564
Summary: RISCV std::atomic needs libatomics
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107952
--- Comment #19 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11)
> > Agreed, usually where these extension should be documented?
>
> They are usually documented in doc/extend.texi
there is one section on "Ze
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
--- Comment #8 from Gaius Mulley ---
All git committed and pushed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108563
Bug ID: 108563
Summary: [concepts] ICE (segfault) when requiring
sizeof(variable_tempalate_v)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108562
Bug ID: 108562
Summary: [meta-bug] tracker bug for issues with
-Wanalyzer-null-dereference
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108519
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
Ah, a worthy sequel to "Note that I wasn't able to figure out a usable email
address for the submitter" from PR 107353. Nevermind then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108463
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The first two differences are between insns 1204 vs. 1116 and 1204 vs. 1095:
(insn 1095 1094 1097 2 (set (mem/c:V4SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
(const_int -104 [0xff98])) [1 S16 A1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108463
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've now tried:
--- sched-deps.cc.jj7 2023-01-19 09:58:50.971227752 +0100
+++ sched-deps.cc 2023-01-26 20:58:30.036035079 +0100
@@ -2498,7 +2498,10 @@ sched_analyze_1 (class deps_desc *deps,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #12 from Linus Torvalds ---
So it might be worth pointing explicitly to Vlastimil's email at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/2b857e20-5e3a-13ec-a0b0-1f69d2d04...@suse.cz/
which has annotated objdump output and seems to point to the a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108519
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried to test that patch but it didn't apply cleanly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108543
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[10/11/12/13 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54354|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108543
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:786923f74d6adfaf572f3d7c0307c51c522567f9
commit r12-9071-g786923f74d6adfaf572f3d7c0307c51c522567f9
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8e07c7951421e718bcafbe5924e75c9aa133af9
commit r13-5400-gc8e07c7951421e718bcafbe5924e75c9aa133af9
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108463
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, seems during the code added by above patch without the 0 && new_cselib_val
creates a value on DEBUG_INSNs for:
1) (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
(const_int NN)) [1 S4 A64])
for NN 76 to 132
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:56:02AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> I found that the attached patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108543
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a82ce9c8d155ecda2d1c647d5c588f29e21ef4a3
commit r13-5399-ga82ce9c8d155ecda2d1c647d5c588f29e21ef4a3
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That changed with https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue581 which I implemented
for GCC 12 in r12-1817-gf8c5b542f6cb6a so I guess you're looking at gcc-11 or
older.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #3 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov ---
Also, the standard seems to mention that flush() is an "unformatted output
function", meaning it is supposed to build and check a sentry object (which in
case of a bad stream, would fail, so it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #2 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov ---
Indeed, it does not. But the reason the endl manipulator is there, is to flush
_after_ '\n'. If the stream has gone bad in between, it is the gray area, but
for the output device (the stream
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108463
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oops, ignore the 0 && part in the above patch, I've added that while trying to
get the ICE on this PR back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108463
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From what I can see, the r13-5252 change removed for DEBUG_INSNs two things,
one is the
cselib_lookup_from_insn call with 1 as create and the other is the
shallow_copy_rtx + cselib_subst_to_values_from_insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 54356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54356&action=edit
Reduced reproducer
False positive
seen here with no optimization:
https://godbolt.org/z/cfqz1fYKx
with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The standard doesn't say anything about not flushing if the put (or any
previous output function) failed.
> Calls os.put(os.widen(’\n’)), then os.flush().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101832
--- Comment #9 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I will add a routine in tree-object-size.cc to check whether a reference to a
structure or union field includes a flexible array member in the inner
structure, such structure or union should be c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
Bug ID: 108561
Summary: std::endl causes a flush on a bad stream
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 54355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54355&action=edit
Partch under test - partial reversion of r13-5373-g80cf2c5e8f496b
This reverts the part of r13-5373-g80cf2c5e8f4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This might be related to C++ core issue cwg2403: https://wg21.link/cwg2403
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd4578f4779b27b2115d78226ff7df46c939061
commit r13-5398-g6dd4578f4779b27b2115d78226ff7df46c939061
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09176201ec6a21c25b1edb07f19f83be22a123f9
commit r13-5397-g09176201ec6a21c25b1edb07f19f83be22a123f9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108560
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108560
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #10 from Tang, Feng ---
Created attachment 54352
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54352&action=edit
page_alloc.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #9 from Tang, Feng ---
For original report
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202301170941.49728982-oliver.s...@intel.com/t/, it
was reported by Sang Oliver from 0Day team, but I failed to add him too cc
(probably due to he is not registe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108560
Bug ID: 108560
Summary: builtin_va_arg_pack_len is documented to return
size_t, but actually returns int
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88853
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105300
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105300
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f353b0c1dc9385ba8b8a64b65d66d5452383c11
commit r13-5390-g9f353b0c1dc9385ba8b8a64b65d66d5452383c11
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108535
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108432
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Analyzer fails to detect|RFE: analyzer could detect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608
--- Comment #44 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #43)
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608
> >
> > --- Comment #42 from Xi Ruoyao ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108524
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 108507, which changed state.
Bug 108507 Summary: [13 regression] new test case
gcc.dg/analyzer/SARD-tc841-basic-00182-min.c in r13-5244-gc6a09bfa03 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108507
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108507
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108507
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1eab269288ffa80ba924ddb4c4b36f8f781d613
commit r13-5389-gf1eab269288ffa80ba924ddb4c4b36f8f781d613
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108524
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bffea89f1f164efc10dd37d979a83c4c5fbfa7e
commit r13-5388-g7bffea89f1f164efc10dd37d979a83c4c5fbfa7e
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108558
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> I bet that this is a problem of 'gfc_split_omp_clauses': [...]
Heh, so indeed as I suspected:
(In reply to myself from comment #0)
> (Decomposed combined con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3376467ce090aa0966d59ca3aea35db4f17a4b47
commit r13-5386-g3376467ce090aa0966d59ca3aea35db4f17a4b47
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108530
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93e2bf51dedd0870b78b770b72e34b15a7a0d14a
commit r13-5385-g93e2bf51dedd0870b78b770b72e34b15a7a0d14a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108520
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly cleaned up testcase:
static void foo () {}
struct S { void (*f) (); };
[[gnu::nonnull (1)]]
void
bar (void *x)
{
struct S a[3] = { { foo }, { foo }, { foo } };
for (struct S *i = a, *e = a + 3;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Created attachment 54351 [details]
> gcc13-pr108540.patch
>
> Untested fix.
LGTM. Thanks for looking at this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108557
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|gaius at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107323
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107554
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d62d86d958a217cdb4155a557aeda1d0e644aba
commit r10-11179-g5d62d86d958a217cdb4155a557aeda1d0e644aba
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107323
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95e5c07aa216fe2863ea02e8508a51b5f7528839
commit r10-11178-g95e5c07aa216fe2863ea02e8508a51b5f7528839
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58e39fcaaf298ff54b6f1a45fa9d15390e8113fb
commit r10-11177-g58e39fcaaf298ff54b6f1a45fa9d15390e8113fb
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0a3e323a0c0e3db7dcd428587f0633209f9ceec
commit r10-11176-gd0a3e323a0c0e3db7dcd428587f0633209f9ceec
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> I might reduced that:
>
> $ cat Termbase.mod
> IMPLEMENTATION MODULE Termbase ;
> TYPE
>ReadMethods = POINTER TO RECORD
>s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
