https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338

--- Comment #12 from palmer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've got a somewhat recently rebased version of Patrick's patch floating
around, it passed testing but I got hung up on the futex_time64 thing and
forgot about it.  Not sure if folks think it's too late for the upcoming CGC
release, but I wouldn't be opposed to taking it -- looks like distros aro going
to apply workarounds if we don't do something, so at least this way there'll be
a single workaround in trunk.

There's some bigger fixes in the works for the whole memory model as we've got
other issues, but since those are a bit tricker it might be worth just doing
the stop-gap thing for now.

Reply via email to