https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105543
Bug ID: 105543
Summary: Function returning a class array with contiguous
attribute rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
--- Comment #56 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #55)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #54)
> > (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #53)
> > > The patch no longer applies to GCC 12.
> >
> > Right because I think th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105542
Bug ID: 105542
Summary: [F03] Orthogonal standard-conforming type finalization
tests
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105529
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb2921ab84dba014f24be06663636c7fb1361474
commit r13-221-gbb2921ab84dba014f24be06663636c7fb1361474
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
--- Comment #55 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #54)
> (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #53)
> > The patch no longer applies to GCC 12.
>
> Right because I think this issue has been fixed by r12-5855-g747380f47da0da .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
--- Comment #54 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #53)
> The patch no longer applies to GCC 12.
Right because I think this issue has been fixed by r12-5855-g747380f47da0da .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #53 from L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101168
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:067fe66c8ba9b16feacf66fce9ae668091e42821
commit r13-220-g067fe66c8ba9b16feacf66fce9ae668091e42821
Author: Jiufu Guo
Date: Mon May 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> template
> constexpr bool is_hello = false;
>
> template
> requires (!is_hello)
> class Hello;
>
> template
> requires (!is_hello)
> class Hello {};
>
> static_assert(requi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
Bug ID: 105541
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault when template lambda in
requires-clause
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 104565, which changed state.
Bug 104565 Summary: [10 Regression] constexpr template goes wrong with class
and call to constexpr method
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104565
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104565
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105304
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105304
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a8b7edbe65ec6350a996eab51a7c26a087e6d2b
commit r10-10605-g9a8b7edbe65ec6350a996eab51a7c26a087e6d2b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103455
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09ab962a42d81eff636c1ebc7de43dac7cc7a7c0
commit r10-10604-g09ab962a42d81eff636c1ebc7de43dac7cc7a7c0
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104565
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22682e291ef4b5dcb6be3a12089dbbc46889002c
commit r10-10603-g22682e291ef4b5dcb6be3a12089dbbc46889002c
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad0398474aff6bb7726e9117711b0a111a4b69e7
commit r10-10602-gad0398474aff6bb7726e9117711b0a111a4b69e7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104225
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad0398474aff6bb7726e9117711b0a111a4b69e7
commit r10-10602-gad0398474aff6bb7726e9117711b0a111a4b69e7
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105540
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8562fbaae9d0c06316188c4749a2171071b6b926
commit r11-9971-g8562fbaae9d0c06316188c4749a2171071b6b926
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105540
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I forgot to backport r12-6867
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105540
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105540
--- Comment #1 from James McKelvey ---
Created attachment 52946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52946&action=edit
Config log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105540
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105510
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
We have a documented extension:
As a GNU extension, GCC allows initialization of objects with static
storage
duration by compound literals (which is not possible in ISO C99 because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105540
Bug ID: 105540
Summary: gcc-11-20220506 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack
of secure_getenv
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105526
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105539
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Not really, Fre considers the defered init as being uninitialized still and
then does optimization based on that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 103539, which changed state.
Bug 103539 Summary: [C++23] P2324 - Labels at the end of compound statements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103539
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103539
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103539
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b2a6628644b2ce15d877c1e85d14e314965a296
commit r13-217-g4b2a6628644b2ce15d877c1e85d14e314965a296
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103853
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103877
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103549
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|9.5
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105501
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105501
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c97f7fd2382aa77f36567207e949447db90a1fb
commit r13-216-g8c97f7fd2382aa77f36567207e949447db90a1fb
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105539
--- Comment #2 from Kees Cook ---
https://godbolt.org/z/99Pdro9Te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105539
--- Comment #1 from Kees Cook ---
(Also this doesn't warn about y being used uninitialized.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105539
Bug ID: 105539
Summary: -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero happening too late?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105538
Bug ID: 105538
Summary: [OpenMP] ALLOCA - MALLOC issue with firstprivate
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91544
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105537
Bug ID: 105537
Summary: ICE: cannot update SSA form (error: statement uses
released SSA name)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101870
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|9.5
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105536
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
The issue occurred at real-world code (sollve_vv testcase before it was fixed).
The issue is because of:
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_NAME)
&& c_parser_peek_2nd_token (parser)->type == C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103650
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 10.4 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105502
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105502
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b005000525ab0a5116d21217c41fb1da5bd03796
commit r9-10066-gb005000525ab0a5116d21217c41fb1da5bd03796
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105536
Bug ID: 105536
Summary: [OpenMP] Bogus "expected ‘concurrent’ before
‘reproducible’"
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, openm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103630
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93a621991615e943704ed1a957d934736bf8a3d3
commit r9-10063-g93a621991615e943704ed1a957d934736bf8a3d3
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93151
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:740e1ae17770d8e4829714c689f5471d235184b7
commit r9-10062-g740e1ae17770d8e4829714c689f5471d235184b7
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93151
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b5211c85aed64c7f6034dad8f57e03c0302c5ec
commit r9-10061-g4b5211c85aed64c7f6034dad8f57e03c0302c5ec
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101870
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ed333b0762d847ffb0096ba97e924188c766d69
commit r9-10059-g5ed333b0762d847ffb0096ba97e924188c766d69
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4a170bf3a2b0397a5d73f7cac24f6df4298569e
commit r9-10058-gb4a170bf3a2b0397a5d73f7cac24f6df4298569e
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103853
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79b7b824346d3cb3101d1896f81ed16392b7471c
commit r9-10056-g79b7b824346d3cb3101d1896f81ed16392b7471c
Author: Pavel I. Kryu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103549
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:756d1581d11c583d9cbfc2e0b7ce1a095845085e
commit r9-10055-g756d1581d11c583d9cbfc2e0b7ce1a095845085e
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103877
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dae73190d42a8074cc393c759338942d0de8b2bd
commit r9-10054-gdae73190d42a8074cc393c759338942d0de8b2bd
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103650
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de3549eb7bba1af6894b6ad781b6943b16883f2b
commit r9-10053-gde3549eb7bba1af6894b6ad781b6943b16883f2b
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102048
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44afdb5f23ed752fb7b3ac095831ba65901c45f2
commit r9-10050-g44afdb5f23ed752fb7b3ac095831ba65901c45f2
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8da8ed881e7cdb2d4b070d685d6d3fe8d31529c2
commit r10-10601-g8da8ed881e7cdb2d4b070d685d6d3fe8d31529c2
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105502
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3a0d3a778643bcb82bdf41a67a5ddc1f95c6f53
commit r10-10600-gf3a0d3a778643bcb82bdf41a67a5ddc1f95c6f53
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91456
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from 康桓瑋
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105256
--- Comment #34 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f08ea45bad43024a1458dca6e37c5c1bcc02e234
commit r13-214-gf08ea45bad43024a1458dca6e37c5c1bcc02e234
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99453
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> This will use the last matching file for the libstdc++* glob. That works
> fine for ELF targets where the matching names are:
>
> libstdc++.a
> libstdc++.so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
--- Comment #3 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fixed in gcc13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b86943aca51175968e40bbb6f2662dfe3fbfe59
commit r13-213-g0b86943aca51175968e40bbb6f2662dfe3fbfe59
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon May 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105535
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Helfert ---
Hello Martin,
Thanks for your quick response to my bug report.
I'm not familiar with the customs on the gcc-patches mailing list.
Would be nice if you might put the patch on the gcc-patches mailing l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105502
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb049ef0f4651786aa49110189487e7f8bf343a6
commit r11-9970-geb049ef0f4651786aa49110189487e7f8bf343a6
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105535
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105535
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-09
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105491
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c7bce0ac184c057bacad9c8e615ce82923835fd
commit r13-211-g0c7bce0ac184c057bacad9c8e615ce82923835fd
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105534
--- Comment #4 from Mathias Stearn ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Note there's
>
> _2 = value_1(D) * x_2;
>
> where _2 might be effectively uninitialized iff x_2 is not zero. When x_2
> is zero then _2 has a well-defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105534
--- Comment #3 from Mathias Stearn ---
One slightly confusing aspect is that the wording of the flag implies that the
variable may or may not be uninitialzied (because in -Wmaybe-uninitialized
maybe binds directly to uninitialized), while phrasi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105513
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
Just note #c4 in pr105504 also solve this issue.
>Another possible solution is add a little bit dislike for "m" alternative(like
>?m) to avoid potential spill.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105354
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105354
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcda0efccad41eba9134c1bd9d024a93d93fb82f
commit r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba9134c1bd9d024a93d93fb82f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Apr 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105534
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note there's
_2 = value_1(D) * x_2;
where _2 might be effectively uninitialized iff x_2 is not zero. When x_2
is zero then _2 has a well-defined value. So to start thinking about this
I'd do a RPO wal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105535
Bug ID: 105535
Summary: GCOV analysis on 16-bit target systems impossible
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105534
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105510
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105534
Bug ID: 105534
Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized shouldn't suppress
-Wuninitialized warnings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105510
--- Comment #2 from 。 <570070308 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> As a workaround it works with
>
> struct Test t=(struct Test){1, {3, 4}};
>
> I don't think it your way of writing is actually valid though.
Yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104731
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6190ebb07cdc2de339c19b236b67bc4106d2bb54
commit r11-9969-g6190ebb07cdc2de339c19b236b67bc4106d2bb54
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105517
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105517
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:faabc751d0bb7e7fe86abfe8991b0307d585874a
commit r13-205-gfaabc751d0bb7e7fe86abfe8991b0307d585874a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104731
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
>> It is indeed, tested on Solaris 11.3 and 11.4, SPARC and x86.
>
> Gret, thanks for checking. I'll backport to gcc-11 and gcc-12.
Excellent, thanks.
>> > ld.so.1: g++: fatal: relocat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104731
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df8e384d5f91076f35852baed0974793b37ec313
commit r12-8358-gdf8e384d5f91076f35852baed0974793b37ec313
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105533
Bug ID: 105533
Summary: UBSAN: gcc/expmed.cc:3272:26: runtime error: signed
integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 - 1 cannot be
represented in type 'long int'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104731
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6)
> > --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> > This should be fixed on trunk, but I'm unable to test on Solaris right now:
>
> It is indeed, t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105396
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] missed |[9/10 Regression] missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: in |[10 Regression] ICE: in
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
