https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105536
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The issue occurred at real-world code (sollve_vv testcase before it was fixed).
The issue is because of:
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_NAME)
&& c_parser_peek_2nd_token (parser)->type == CPP_COLON)
/* ... Parse reproducible/unconstrained ... */
p = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (c_parser_peek_token (parser)->value);
if (strcmp (p, "concurrent") != 0)
{
c_parser_error (parser, "expected %<concurrent%>");
goto out_err;
}
And the error message is then 'expected concurrent'
+ auto-added "before <what comes instead>"
That message is fine – except for this specific case it is somewhat misleading.
→ The question is whether we want to handle this in a different way
(yield better error message, how?)
OR – whether that's just too specific and close this PR as WONTFIX?
