https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104700
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Fix in testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104700
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Btw. I see the same ICE on libreoffice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104700
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104686
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
The pushed change is a micro-optimization not really addressing the underlying
issue which needs more analysis.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104686
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8250bbaeb2e8250c20db477fe67fd085214be7c
commit r12-7401-ga8250bbaeb2e8250c20db477fe67fd085214be7c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104664
--- Comment #4 from Hongyu Wang ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> Reconfirmed as RA issue.
I'm afraid we'd avoid pattern like
(insn 180 179 182 2 (set (reg:V8HF 220)
(subreg:V8HF (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #28 from cuilili ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #25)
> Can this be mitigated by removing redundant load and store?
Yes, inlining say_sphere can remove redundant loads and stores, O3 does
inlining, but O2 is more sensitive to c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104712
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ajrh from comment #2)
> Oh drat, reduced test cases are maddening... it's an inline static const
> in my original. I'll try to reduce something again.
I think even with inline static const,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104712
--- Comment #2 from ajrh at ajrh dot net ---
Oh drat, reduced test cases are maddening... it's an inline static const in
my original. I'll try to reduce something again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104712
Bug ID: 104712
Summary: -fkeep-inline-functions causing link errors (debian
but not godbolt?)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104704
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > ix86_expand_vector_move shouldn't use ix86_gen_scratch_sse_rtx.
>
> Is it problematic for TARGET_GEN_MEMSET_SCRATCH_RTX?
It i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104686
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #11)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > > > Both revisions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104704
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> ix86_expand_vector_move shouldn't use ix86_gen_scratch_sse_rtx.
Is it problematic for TARGET_GEN_MEMSET_SCRATCH_RTX?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104704
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
Yes, thanks for the reproduced testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #27 from Hongtao.liu ---
> We can start with disabling vectorization with very cheap cost model to fix
Of course only for (>=)16-byte struct passing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #26 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #21)
> > Now we have SLP node available in vector cost hook, maybe we can do sth in
> > cost model to prevent vectorizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104686
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > > Both revisions affect vectorizer cost modeling only. With
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104618
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0096b0b467b2c98ed258f0ead9a8b87b2a6d8466
commit r12-7398-g0096b0b467b2c98ed258f0ead9a8b87b2a6d8466
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 52522
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52522&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
... does NOT have a good enough balance ...
Sorry :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #1 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Bug ID: 104711
Summary: Unnecessary -Wshift-negative-value warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104710
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104710
Bug ID: 104710
Summary: Ada-Bootstrap fails with gcc-4.8.4
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104570
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 52495 [details]
> > untested patch.
>
> I see these regressions with -m32:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> Created attachment 52495 [details]
> untested patch.
I see these regressions with -m32:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"
FAIL: gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104709
Bug ID: 104709
Summary: A translated error message will include untanslated
parts
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104705
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80270
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |roger at
nextmovesoftware dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui314 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104708
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104708
--- Comment #1 from Rui Ueyama ---
Here is the link to the original bug report:
https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/358
35 matches
Mail list logo
