https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104446
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This testcase is invalid code of course, so anything can happen. ICEs are bad
though ;-)
Please add to the comment that you don't want this substitution because it
leads
to ICEs, and mention the PR #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
--- Comment #29 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #28)
> Could somebody benchmark the following patch on zen2 470.lbm.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
> index 9cee17479ba..76619a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104479
Bug ID: 104479
Summary: [12 Regression] cond_op is combined without
considering single_use
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104470
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is the full backtrace:
In file included from t.cc:2:
/home/apinski/upstream-gcc/include/c++/12.0.1/variant: In substitution of
‘template template using __accepted_type =
std::variant<_Types>::__to_type<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100038
James Y Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foom at fuhm dot net
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104455
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1)
> What's the configuration of the compiler? Eg, the output of gcc -v
Thanks Richard. I set-up a Debian Qemu/Chroot for armhf. I can now duplicate
the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104438
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104438
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104470
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>When I switch to c++17 mode compiler does not crash.
yes because C++17 does not support deduction of template arguments of template
alias's while C++20 does. Note clang does not implement that yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104474
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41582f88ec01c5ce2f85ebc4ac2743eb426d6e33
commit r12-7159-g41582f88ec01c5ce2f85ebc4ac2743eb426d6e33
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104451
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1, 11.2.1, 12.0, 9.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104469
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104224
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104458
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104462
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104458
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:983b7bcdd048650b193aad6018042b21626b89eb
commit r10-10444-g983b7bcdd048650b193aad6018042b21626b89eb
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104462
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8a496d7a28c3dda868c201621b001825ea6cef9
commit r11-9549-gf8a496d7a28c3dda868c201621b001825ea6cef9
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104458
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11fc7d98a25128d016b8f6f453c193878faf2570
commit r11-9548-g11fc7d98a25128d016b8f6f453c193878faf2570
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #8 from Svante Signell ---
> If you make all-target-libgo all dependencies are respected.
Sorry but that is not how things work:
all-target-libgo: maybe-all-target-libffi
is outside any conditionals, but
all-target-libgo: maybe-all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3ffea93ef31c03ad8cdcb54e71ec868b57b264f
commit r12-7153-gf3ffea93ef31c03ad8cdcb54e71ec868b57b264f
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103658
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103658
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Note that with -fno-analyzer-state-merge, -fanalyzer warns without optimization
and shows the conditionals you hoped to see:
./xgcc -B. -S -fanalyzer /tmp/foo.c -fno-analyzer-state-merge
/tmp/foo.c: In fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104443
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
On further reflection, I'm not convinced the standard really intends to make
the pointer type a reference. That's weird. Returning a pointer as a pointer
makes a lot more sense.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104442
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5669a60e2fcc90afaa16fe20391cdcf18ab398d7
commit r11-9547-g5669a60e2fcc90afaa16fe20391cdcf18ab398d7
Author: Thomas Rodgers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104442
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Rodgers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cf3c339815cdfa636b25a512f91b63d7c313fd6
commit r12-7151-g4cf3c339815cdfa636b25a512f91b63d7c313fd6
Author: Thomas Rodgers
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
--- Comment #3 from Erik Carstensen ---
Do we know that some suspected underlying issue is fixed, or could it be that
the window of slowness (struct size ∈ [17,80]) just has moved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wstringop-overflow +|[12 Regression]
|atom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0, 4.9.0, 5.1.0
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70692
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104474
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 104478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104478
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104478
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
pported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104441
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:354349e7d59323559d0e372484f10358bd86a54f
commit r12-7149-g354349e7d59323559d0e372484f10358bd86a54f
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Feb 9 11:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||98940
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104477
Bug ID: 104477
Summary: [C++23] Implement P2255R2, type trait to detect
reference binding to temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104427
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:499f8d4c2bc585b985882b4716f35b4c1553ce32
commit r12-7148-g499f8d4c2bc585b985882b4716f35b4c1553ce32
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Bug ID: 104476
Summary: using-decl shadowed by member function when in
incomplete-class context
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
Bug ID: 104475
Summary: Wstringop-overflow + atomics incorrect warning on
dynamic object
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
9b18-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104462
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f9ab267e725ddf2b6b44113e4fc4fb8b2a6adfb
commit r12-7147-g2f9ab267e725ddf2b6b44113e4fc4fb8b2a6adfb
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104458
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b399dbabd48639ab4daac462c9d82c6cf3f99cc
commit r12-7146-g2b399dbabd48639ab4daac462c9d82c6cf3f99cc
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97040
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eefec38c992e3622a69de9667e91f0cafbff03cc
commit r12-7145-geefec38c992e3622a69de9667e91f0cafbff03cc
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Wed Feb 9 14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104459
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On the other side, df-scan.cc does in 3 other spots:
/* By adding the ref directly, df_insn_rescan my not find any
differences even though the block will have changed. So we need
to mark the blo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97040
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So a bit more background. I was doing some maintenance work on the v850 a few
years back and noticed an issue with e3v5 testing and FMAs. I poked around a
bit and had largely ruled out the generic bits of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #14 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> And also take into account different rounding modes if
> user wants that to be honored.
And that would eliminate the need to consider the possibility of doub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104409
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #4)
> Probably related crash: (with -fpack-struct)
That is recorded as PR 103147 already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104409
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Probably related crash: (with -fpack-struct)
$ echo > testcase.c
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -march=armv8.6-a+ls64 -fpack-struct testcase.c
: internal compiler error: in aarch64_init_ls64_builtins_types, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104466
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||60712
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104457
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
I have made some substantial changes to how profile_counts are updated in
IPA-CP, so trying the current master is definitely a good idea. It might just
work and even if it does not, fixing it there would pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104409
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
20209111047-ged3fea09b18-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Macleod ---
> etc. which would be great if it could use frange. Though, I think we also
> run here into the problem that match.pd right now avoids the ranger because
> it could reliably only allow walks from uses to
cc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7128-20220209090954-gc6bb1db76b3-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #7)
> > Very cool. ANd no, I'm not enough of an expert on the FP side to shepherd
> > that though. I would expect it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
By the way, it would be good to invent some (slightly?) more intuitive API for
ipa_param_adjustments adjustments, merging and similar operations. I simply
left it for later when I hoped I would have a bette
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104471
Bug ID: 104471
Summary: ICE with -nostdinc: NULL directory in find_file
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Feng Xue from comment #1)
>
> OK. I does missed something. Here we could not hold assumption that
> ipcp_decision_stage() only sees raw cgraph node, since sometime in the
> future some new ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104470
Bug ID: 104470
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling
std::variant with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #10 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #9)
> Subnormals might also need to be considered as special cases: "Whether and
> in what cases subnormal numbers are treated as zeros is implementation
> defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #9 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> As I've mentioned, I'm hoping some floating expert can take this across to
> goal line, as my head will start spinning as soon as we start talking about
> NANs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #7)
> Very cool. ANd no, I'm not enough of an expert on the FP side to shepherd
> that though. I would expect it to be exceptionally tricky on the solver
> side.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25689
--- Comment #3 from Zhao Wei Liew ---
Created attachment 52395
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52395&action=edit
Test patch (seeking feedback)
Hi! I wrote a small patch to fix this issue, but I think that it has much room
fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102586
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Shall it treat the fields that partially fall into the range and partially
> don't as padding (ignore them)
In short yes, but...
What a wacky class hierarchy.
s=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7128-20220209090954-gc6bb1db76b3-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220209 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104400
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
Joseph Faulls changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Gcc is not responsible for debug info that is done for the .s file, please
report that issue to binutils: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104432
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104432
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee50b4383a0dca88172c3a821418344bd7391956
commit r12-7134-gee50b4383a0dca88172c3a821418344bd7391956
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103921, which changed state.
Bug 103921 Summary: [modules] ICE dependent expression in explicit-specifier of
instantiation of imported template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103921
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
--- Comment #5 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
*** Bug 103921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103921
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104443
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #21 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #13)
> > > I think there are two code spots whose pitfalls resulted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 102562, which changed state.
Bug 102562 Summary: [12 Regression][modules] Failing
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header tests since r12-4067-gc46ecb0112e91c8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102562
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102562
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
--- Comment #28 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Could somebody benchmark the following patch on zen2 470.lbm.
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
index 9cee17479ba..76619aca8eb 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
+++ b/gcc/lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johelegp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103752, which changed state.
Bug 103752 Summary: [12 Regression][ICE][modules] with import
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo