https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101266
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |c
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101264
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101262
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|11.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101260
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101266
Bug ID: 101266
Summary: ICE with -g: in loc_list_from_tree_1, at
dwarf2out.c:19421
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101264
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101262
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101262
--- Comment #4 from Hubert Kowalski ---
I tried to generate a reproducer based of off code that in linked reports is
"guaranteed to crash" when compilled with GCC 11. My feel is that since it
doesn't work in isolation there's more moving parts t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367
--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Any progress on this (after two years? :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91085
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bf383c37e6131a8e247e8a0997d55d65c830b6d
commit r12-1924-g6bf383c37e6131a8e247e8a0997d55d65c830b6d
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Mon Jun 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101248
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101248
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed392e9db434898eccec81edd85323d21d555fe9
commit r12-1923-ged392e9db434898eccec81edd85323d21d555fe9
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101256
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 51087
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51087&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101260
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101262
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can't reproduce with -O2 -fopenmp, neither with 10.3.1 20210422, nor current 11
branch, nor current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> It does exactly what the standard says it does. And it's self explanatory.
What is self-explanatory in is_integral_v? It could be "is integral verbo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
It should at least be present on the API page. The standard is not for
developers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101256
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a fix but I don't have a testcase really.
What is happening is value_replacement is happening but since the ssa_name that
is being used for replace_phi_edge_with_variable is not newly defined, we are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101265
Bug ID: 101265
Summary: C2X [[maybe_unused]] ignored when placed after array
declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100823
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a96d8d67d0073a7031c0712bc3fb7759417b2125
commit r12-1916-ga96d8d67d0073a7031c0712bc3fb7759417b2125
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101262
--- Comment #2 from Hubert Kowalski ---
I've tried producing a minimum reproducer in form of code below, however I run
on gcc 10.3. And it depends on optimization type.
According to user reports - it's enough to compile darktable using GCC 11 w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101064
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I have attached a C test case that demonstrates the problem. The C case may be
somewhat worse because I had to use ordinary variables, whereas the Go test
case is used compiler-generated temporary variab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101064
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Created attachment 51086
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51086&action=edit
C test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101064
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101264
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101264
Bug ID: 101264
Summary: ICE in vect_optimize_slp, at tree-vect-slp.c:3880
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Comment on attachment 51084 [details]
> another patch
>
> Except for some consistency (max is in comments lowercase, but MIN is
> uppercase), it looks good t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101064
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:528ed794016472a209d6cfaa921307f30eee58da
commit r11-8663-g528ed794016472a209d6cfaa921307f30eee58da
Author: Ian Lance Ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101064
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a8a7d332d5d01db5aea7336a36d9fd71a679fb1
commit r12-1913-g8a8a7d332d5d01db5aea7336a36d9fd71a679fb1
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101262
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101200
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
FWIW, it might be worth considering using a mode iterator for the shift count
to allow multiple modes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Comment on attachment 51084
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51084
another patch
Except for some consistency (max is in comments lowercase, but MIN is
uppercase), it looks good to me.
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101263
Bug ID: 101263
Summary: non-propagating-cache::emplace-deref missing constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101262
Bug ID: 101262
Summary: GCC11 OpenMP optimization causes sigsegv on aligned
constant array in darktable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c60d9160b4d966dbea5b1bbea4f817c64d0bee2d
commit r12-1912-gc60d9160b4d966dbea5b1bbea4f817c64d0bee2d
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
if (node->definition
&& (node->alias || !tree_versionable_function_p (node->decl)))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51083|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
Luis Machado changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luis.machado at linaro dot org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261
Bug ID: 101261
Summary: clones for target_clones attribute cannot be created
when compilling with -fno-semantic-interposition
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #2 from Jon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It does exactly what the standard says it does. And it's self explanatory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100328
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #6)
> Created attachment 51066 [details]
> aarch64 XPASS failure list
>
> The patch v3 bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-redhat-linux and
> powe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
While reviewing other things, I found that "'alloca' is a preview feature in
PTX ISA version 7.3", and "requires 'sm_52' or higher". That got published
2021-05, so it'll be a while until we can reliably us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod ---
I just never added them... I guess we could fully flesh out the combinations
and results. Note this is also the only non-relational operand that is even
implemented so far.. Haven't gotten to any of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100975
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BTW, rel of NE_EXPR, LE_EXPR or LT_EXPR never appear? I guess one can always
swap the two operands and thus transform LE_EXPR into GE_EXPR and LT_EXPR into
GT_EXPR, but for EQ_EXPR vs. NE_EXPR that doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, from x > y signed -fwrapv you can assume x - y to be ~[0, 0] (from x >= y
nothing).
It is similar to unsigned, though in that case there are no negative values and
so for x >= y x - y [0, max] is the a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51082|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101260
Bug ID: 101260
Summary: Backport 27381e78925 to GCC 11
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Anyway, I think you just can't assume anything for the SIGNED &&
TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS case, the result can be anything (VARYING) both for the
GT_EXPR and GE_EXPR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96306
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Julian Brown :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0f8c22a3e9f8cd45c1cb4be5f83afbebe3bfdc9
commit r12-1911-gc0f8c22a3e9f8cd45c1cb4be5f83afbebe3bfdc9
Author: Julian Brown
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
INT_MAX - INT_MIN with -fwrapv is -1, indeed, and generally if
x > y then x - y < 0 iff x > y + INT_MAX.
Say
x = 1073741839
y = -1073741887
x > y && x - y (== -2147483570) < 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #1)
> (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> > template class>
> > constexpr auto f() {}
>
> That means auto is void, doesn’t it?
Yes, the second auto just means void.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 51082
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51082&action=edit
patch
I *think* this is correct. but wrapv and signed stuff sometimes confuses me
:-)
when -fwrapv is on,
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20210629, and trunk 20210629 of the gm2 repo, configured as a
normal bootstrap build:
/packages/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67300
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|81886 |
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
Bug ID: 101258
Summary: std ::is_integral_v is undocumented
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909
Christopher Yeleighton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67300
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Done: -foffload= and new -foffload-options= are now documented.
To do: Still undocumented:
-foffload-abi=[lp64|ilp32]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67300
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33c4e466243f2d0459d9a4d0cadc1b38a3741f3e
commit r12-1871-g33c4e466243f2d0459d9a4d0cadc1b38a3741f3e
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90742
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:489c5dcf7b063000a5e223535eb425cf9748720a
commit r12-1870-g489c5dcf7b063000a5e223535eb425cf9748720a
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cf8d3fc05737684a16fa080b0c0d24048da782b
commit r11-8662-g2cf8d3fc05737684a16fa080b0c0d24048da782b
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101257
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101256
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101257
Bug ID: 101257
Summary: [11/12 Regression] Maybe wrong code since IPA mod ref
was introduced
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101256
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101256
Bug ID: 101256
Summary: [12 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since
r12-1841-g9fe9c45ae33a2df7
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101255
Bug ID: 101255
Summary: FLUSH statement - error should be negative
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101044
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The compound nabs insn also needs to be handled in the STV pass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 regression] |[9/10/11 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101044
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc head does not comply|[12 Regression] gcc head
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101210
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53fd7544aff6d0a18869017cb9bb921a7f5dcd04
commit r12-1867-g53fd7544aff6d0a18869017cb9bb921a7f5dcd04
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101254
Bug ID: 101254
Summary: gcc head does not comply fully to -fwrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100488
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Can you retry with current trunk? There have been several fixes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #17 from Dave Murphy ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> I don't think the patch is sufficient, I think I had a complete one.
Shall I leave this or submit the patch I made as a starting point for review?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101253
Bug ID: 101253
Summary: Optimize i % C1 == C0 || i % C1*C2 == C0 to i % C1 ==
C0
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101252
Bug ID: 101252
Summary: Optimize (b ? i % C0 : i % C1) into i & (b ? C0-1 :
C1-1) for power of 2 C0 and C1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101251
Bug ID: 101251
Summary: Optimize i % (b ? C0 : C1) into i & (b ? C0-1 : C1-1)
for power of 2 C0 and C1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101250
Bug ID: 101250
Summary: adjust_iv_update_pos update the iv statement
unexpectedly cause memory address offset mismatch
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suochenyao at 163 dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101242
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c01760bc548ba79bc9ac15168b27fe7aabcb19ae
commit r12-1866-gc01760bc548ba79bc9ac15168b27fe7aabcb19ae
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101238
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Kalibera ---
I started writing that email, but on the way I found that one should add
-D__USE_MINGW_ACCESS also BOOT_CXXFLAGS, which I have neither done nor tested.
The problem I debugged required only required adding t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think the patch is sufficient, I think I had a complete one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101249
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101247
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101249
Bug ID: 101249
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault with "-O3 -fno-tree-ch
-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse
-fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv"
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101242
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> Created attachment 51078 [details]
> gzipped C++ source code
>
> I also see this with -O3 with the attached C++ code.
Poor example - too big to reduce easi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101240
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note will require a VRP pass after PRE since only there we'll be able to
CSE the a[2] load.
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo