https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100328
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #6) > Created attachment 51066 [details] > aarch64 XPASS failure list > > The patch v3 bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-redhat-linux and > powerpc64le-linux-gnu, but still have some "XFAIL -> XPASS" regression > failures on aarch64-linux-gnu, I think these remaining failures are expected > (assembly gets improved). Need Richard's help to double check/confirm them. Nice! Yeah, these are all progressions rather than regressions. The scan-assemblers in gcc.target/sve/acle check for the preferred output. We don't always get there yet, so some of them have been XFAILed. But for this part of the testsuite all XFAILs->XPASSes are improvements.
