[Bug lto/100692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of, at tree.c:5452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-20 Summary|[11 Regr

[Bug c++/100686] attribute optimize ("O2") doesn't inline lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100686 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c++ --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/100685] #pragma GCC push_options ineffective for optimize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100685 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/91859] Using destroying delete should not clobber stores to the object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91859 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, but those optimizations are just doing what they are designed to do. I suspect that the bug is due to the front end inserting a CLOBBER that says it's ok for those optimizations to do that.

[Bug target/97205] arm: Compiler fails with an ICE for -O0 on Trunk and GCC-10 for _Generic feature.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 19 May 2021, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 > > --- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger --- > Hi Srinath, > > when we add new

[Bug lto/100692] [11 Regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of, at tree.c:5452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692 --- Comment #1 from Luke Street --- Preprocessed source was too large to attach, so here's a GitHub gist: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/encounter/03ecf9a70a225970f8485d3e89dff432/raw/bac21e49cb0f6be88cb7cf5fa80664a0f62b7748/ice_fld_incompl

[Bug lto/100692] New: [11 Regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of, at tree.c:5452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692 Bug ID: 100692 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of, at tree.c:5452 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/100379] cyclades.h is removed from linux kernel header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100379 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grgoffe at yahoo dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug bootstrap/100691] Build of gcc fails with "linux/cyclades.h" not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100691 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/100691] New: Build of gcc fails with "linux/cyclades.h" not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100691 Bug ID: 100691 Summary: Build of gcc fails with "linux/cyclades.h" not found Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug libstdc++/100690] New: ranges::iota_view::_Sentinel cannot access _M_current of _Iterator

::views::iota(std::ranges::begin(x), std::ranges::cbegin(x) + 3); r.end() - r.begin(); r.begin() - r.end(); } :7:22: required from here /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20210519/include/c++/12.0.0/ranges:518:22: error: 'int* std::ranges::iota_view::_Iterator::_M_value' is private w

[Bug c++/100659] [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702 since r11-5003-gd50310408f54e380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100634] [11/12 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:7653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100634] [11/12 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:7653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b54e50285c716fabc3980c5383c4898018a60b28 commit r11-8444-gb54e50285c716fabc3980c5383c4898018a60b28 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/100659] [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702 since r11-5003-gd50310408f54e380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b7212ebb80e854c08274228627ce0a3061db6b0 commit r11-8443-g8b7212ebb80e854c08274228627ce0a3061db6b0 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/100634] [11/12 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:7653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75ab8b4829dec8c70470e8225c9add964f71ed74 commit r12-933-g75ab8b4829dec8c70470e8225c9add964f71ed74 Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug c++/100659] [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702 since r11-5003-gd50310408f54e380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe9a6614a16b5ea7f12141c50b6b7de984390ed8 commit r12-932-gfe9a6614a16b5ea7f12141c50b6b7de984390ed8 Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug c++/100689] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using modules and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100689 Bug ID: 100689 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using modules and -g Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, now I am curious why you are using the jit framework rather than doing a normal GCC front-end; like was done for the other rust gcc front-end https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs .

[Bug target/98734] ABI diagnostics emitted despite always_inline attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98734 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- I develop a gcc codegen for the Rust compiler and it's a feature of Rust to be able to set the link section: https://github.com/antoyo/rustc_codegen_gcc/commit/999f768526d72e19e3eafdc963dcb6af8a1afe60#diff-6bbb0145

[Bug c++/91859] Using destroying delete should not clobber stores to the object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91859 --- Comment #5 from Joseph C. Sible --- The real problem mentioned in comment 2 still happens as of GCC 11.1. I've narrowed it down somewhat to the optimization flags "-Og -ftree-dse -ftree-pta". Removing any one of those will make it behave agai

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I am curious what is the use case here?

[Bug jit/100688] Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50847 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50847&action=edit Patch adding support for setting the link section

[Bug c++/100489] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cp/constexpr.c:3556

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug jit/100688] New: Add support for link section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688 Bug ID: 100688 Summary: Add support for link section Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit Ass

[Bug c++/100687] New: [modules, concepts] imported concept gives different result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100687 Bug ID: 100687 Summary: [modules, concepts] imported concept gives different result Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/100619] [11 Regression] ICE on a VLA parameter with too many dimensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|11.1.0 | Summary|[11/12 Regression] I

[Bug c/100619] [11/12 Regression] ICE: in build_attr_access_from_parms, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5038 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb2a917fa0779b689f09ac8d8c41b0456facbe62 commit r12-930-geb2a917fa0779b689f09ac8d8c41b0456facbe62 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug c++/100634] [11/12 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:7653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/100619] [11/12 Regression] ICE: in build_attr_access_from_parms, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5038 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug middle-end/100684] spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/100658] Typos in dg commands and texi files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100658 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- > What's wrong about the $ sign? Nothing, it's about "dollar". I was just surprised that there was no text snippet "dollar in" in all the sources. You can ignore this section "Additionally ...", on x86_64-

[Bug middle-end/99578] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- It's the pointer itself that needs to be volatile to keep GCC from determining its value. This shows the difference: $ cat pr99578-15.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall pr99578-15.c void f (void) { void* ptr = (void

[Bug c++/100659] [11/12 Regression] ICE in supplement_binding_1, at cp/name-lookup.c:2702 since r11-5003-gd50310408f54e380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100205] [11/12 Regression] error: invalid use of non-static data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100644] [11/12 regression] Deleted move constructor prevents templated constructor from being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100644 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100372] [11/12 Regression] ICE with variadic template template, internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100372 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100261] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or type_decl, have error_mark in emit_tinfo_decl, at cp/rtti.c:1643

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100367] [11/12 Regression] Internal compiler error when std::lexicographical_compare_three_way third and fourth argument are reverse iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100367 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100367] [11/12 Regression] Internal compiler error when std::lexicographical_compare_three_way third and fourth argument are reverse iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100367 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bdd3e45955ef94a1f2db51a2af1ded54d41f670 commit r11-8437-g3bdd3e45955ef94a1f2db51a2af1ded54d41f670 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/96299] Defaulted operator <=> implicitly deleted when a member has operator < and operator == and return type is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bdd3e45955ef94a1f2db51a2af1ded54d41f670 commit r11-8437-g3bdd3e45955ef94a1f2db51a2af1ded54d41f670 Author: Jason Merrill D

[Bug c++/100367] [11/12 Regression] Internal compiler error when std::lexicographical_compare_three_way third and fourth argument are reverse iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100367 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd67343703ef4fa61de837f4690eba70d2760825 commit r12-928-gcd67343703ef4fa61de837f4690eba70d2760825 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tu

[Bug c++/96299] Defaulted operator <=> implicitly deleted when a member has operator < and operator == and return type is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd67343703ef4fa61de837f4690eba70d2760825 commit r12-928-gcd67343703ef4fa61de837f4690eba70d2760825 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue

[Bug c++/93769] Slightly wrong diagnostic message for static_asserts with no message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93769 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Gennaro Prota from comment #2) > Well, I thought this would require changing a single string literal in the > compiler source code. No, there are (at least) 38 diagnostics of the same form. Ch

[Bug middle-end/99578] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Cooper --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > For now, I recommend suppressing the warning either by #pragma GCC > diagnostic or by making the pointer volatile. Trying this with the code sample from comment

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Macleod --- > > > > Would this be useful? and would it solve this problem? I'm sure there are > > other details to work out related to the increased precision, but it seems > > like it might work? > > Hmm, so t

[Bug fortran/97046] Bad interaction between lbound/ubound, allocatable arrays and bind(C) subroutine with dimension(..) parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug fortran/93308] bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 --- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html

[Bug middle-end/99578] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 Andrew Cooper changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Amended patch fixes msp430-elf build as well. Thank you!

[Bug pch/14940] PCH largefile test fails on various platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940 --- Comment #52 from Jonathan Wakely --- N.B. patches need to be posted to the gcc-patches mailing list for review, not here. https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

[Bug middle-end/100686] New: attribute optimize ("O2") doesn't inline lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100686 Bug ID: 100686 Summary: attribute optimize ("O2") doesn't inline lambda Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056053.html

[Bug c++/100596] [12 Regression] error: attribute appertains to a friend declaration that is not a definition since r12-786-g149061188c7c6ddf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100596 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100596] [12 Regression] error: attribute appertains to a friend declaration that is not a definition since r12-786-g149061188c7c6ddf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100596 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adcb497bdba499d161d2e5e8de782bdd6f75d62c commit r12-925-gadcb497bdba499d161d2e5e8de782bdd6f75d62c Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug middle-end/100685] New: #pragma GCC push_options ineffective for optimize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100685 Bug ID: 100685 Summary: #pragma GCC push_options ineffective for optimize options Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/96983] [11/12 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 --- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #34 from Tobias Burnus --- > What's actually the status of the PR – I mean on both powerpc64*-linux-gnu, > sparc*-*-*. > > The summary states that there is an ICE – is thi

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #216 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2021-05-17 5:56 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote: > With the working as, I changed gcc to use brl instructions for calls, > including > tail calls: > > --- gcc-11.1.0/gcc/config/ia64

[Bug c++/96501] [C++11] Should warn when classes only have copy constructor defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96501 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 96501, which changed state. Bug 96501 Summary: [C++11] Should warn when classes only have copy constructor defined https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96501 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/89700] Warn if move constructor is not generated and not deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89700 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nunoplopes at sapo dot pt --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/100680] false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 --- Comment #3 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) > The warning is by design: it considers a constant non-null pointer value a > likely result of (invalid) arithmetic on a null pointer, as in the example

[Bug middle-end/98109] Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to James Legg from comment #2) This is a different problem from the one reported in comment 0 so I opened a new bug for it: pr100684.

[Bug middle-end/100684] spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/100682] Outdated manual about the debug mode using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/100684] New: spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684 Bug ID: 100684 Summary: spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mi

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Nice, thanks, Joern. That patch is OK for trunk and gcc-11 (please remember to CC the libstdc++ list when you post it to gcc-patches).

[Bug target/97205] arm: Compiler fails with an ICE for -O0 on Trunk and GCC-10 for _Generic feature.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 --- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger --- Hi Srinath, when we add new assertions to gcc we use always a gcc_checking_assert nowadays, that is also the case here. The assertion is only firing in your compiler because it is a development snapshot 1

[Bug fortran/100683] New: Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 Bug ID: 100683 Summary: Array initialization refuses valid Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:45:12AM +, ripero84 at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #9 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- > Steve, is this a GCC bug or a FreeBSD bug (or if it is something else, what > s

[Bug libstdc++/100682] New: Outdated manual about the debug mode using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682 Bug ID: 100682 Summary: Outdated manual about the debug mode using Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libst

[Bug libstdc++/100361] gcc-11 for msp430-elf fails to build: src/c++17/floating_to_chars.cc:107: d2fixed_full_table.h:1283:23: error: size of array ‘POW10_SPLIT_2’ exceeds maximum object size ‘32767’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361 --- Comment #8 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke --- Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

[Bug middle-end/100680] false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/99578] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug target/97205] arm: Compiler fails with an ICE for -O0 on Trunk and GCC-10 for _Generic feature.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 --- Comment #20 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17) > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 > > > > --- Comment #16 from

[Bug target/100333] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with CMSE nonsecure call and -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100333 --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan --- Fixed on trunk for now.

[Bug target/100333] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with CMSE nonsecure call and -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100333 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b953740da1976d90d974055c6d825c509c6e654 commit r12-923-g5b953740da1976d90d974055c6d825c509c6e654 Author: Alex Coplan Date: Wed Ma

[Bug target/99977] arm: ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap and -mcpu=cortex-m23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99977 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c412100235ba34ae9c133fb7a77cc52c2e93fc87 commit r11-8435-gc412100235ba34ae9c133fb7a77cc52c2e93fc87 Author: Christophe Lyo

[Bug target/99977] arm: ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap and -mcpu=cortex-m23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99977 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:beeb01541ae845b445837b873126a7f968b8f654 commit r12-922-gbeeb01541ae845b445837b873126a7f968b8f654 Author: Christophe Lyon Date:

[Bug c++/100681] New: [[noreturn]] attribute can be applied to parameters of function type with strange results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100681 Bug ID: 100681 Summary: [[noreturn]] attribute can be applied to parameters of function type with strange results Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/100655] 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ #include +// Include this to get the libstdc++ _GLIBCXX_USE_PTHREAD_CO

[Bug libstdc++/100630] Unexpected implicit conversion from volatile bool& to std::filesystem::path in gcc <= 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug target/100678] [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- I ran into this in a different OpenACC context (OpenACC privatization levels), where in testcases we're trying to use 'atomic' on 'private' variables. ... which for nvptx offloading only works for gang-pr

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0| Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/100672] wrong code with vector shift and unary minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100672 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d51039cb7c807ed84ff7df5416a1e3ba07a5e63 commit r12-913-g8d51039cb7c807ed84ff7df5416a1e3ba07a5e63 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c/100680] false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c/100680] New: false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680 Bug ID: 100680 Summary: false positive warning for certain __builtin_memcmp() argument Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100655] 'g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C' FAILs due to 'pthread_cond_clockwait' missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > It's not glibc-specific though, it's going to be in the next POSIX standard > and other C libraries. > > It's a bit of a hack, but you could include any libstd

[Bug testsuite/100658] Typos in dg commands and texi files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100658 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32bd0353db37af2cb023e575ed4ce8c944fd9dba commit r12-912-g32bd0353db37af2cb023e575ed4ce8c944fd9dba Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug testsuite/100658] Typos in dg commands and texi files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100658 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/100678] [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0) > At this point, it's (a) unclear whether the PR83812 restriction indeed is > supposed to be lifted for certain modern GPU hardware/SM levels/CUDA Driver > releas

[Bug c++/100675] std::string_view::find in constexpr function is not constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100675 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > The following code fails in 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3: > > https://godbolt.org/z/soGT9o4GY > > #include > > template > constexpr bool g() { > std::string_view s = " "; > s.find(

[Bug target/100678] New: [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678 Bug ID: 100678 Summary: [OpenACC/nvptx] 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/private-atomic-1.c' FAILs (differently) in certain configurations Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug libstdc++/100630] Unexpected implicit conversion from volatile bool& to std::filesystem::path in gcc <= 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630 --- Comment #5 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, Thanks for providing a fix that quickly ! I backported it in my own copy of gcc 8 and 9 and it fixed my issue on these branches as well. Cheers, Romain

[Bug fortran/96983] [11/12 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/83812] nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not supported on global/shared address space

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1467100fc72562a59f70cdd4e05f6c810d1fadcc commit r12-908-g1467100fc72562a59f70cdd4e05f6c810d1fadcc Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

  1   2   >