https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #7 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
A similar issue also reported on X86 before,
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-April/677996.html
While when I bootstrap -O3 on one x86, it passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #6 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
cut..
> 0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a means the location has been GC'ed already; either from
> ggc_free or from a previous ggc_collect.
> What you can try is run with the following options:
> --param ggc-min-expand=1 --par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
build command is:
configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go --with-cpu=native
--disable-multilib --with-long-double-128 --prefix=$HOME/xx
--with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
make -j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #4 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Created attachment 50787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50787&action=edit
t.ii
/home/guojiufu/gcc/build/gcc-mainline-test/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home/guojiufu/gcc/build/gcc-mainline-test/./pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100511
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jiangning Liu from comment #2)
> Then why gcc can't optimize this case either? sizeof (XX) <> sizeof(g) here.
The second case is a VRP issue which really should be filed seperately.
-O3 case i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64949
YumeYao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yumeyao at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100506
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100511
--- Comment #2 from Jiangning Liu ---
Then why gcc can't optimize this case either? sizeof (XX) <> sizeof(g) here.
#include
int a;
typedef struct {
int b;
int count;
} XX;
int g;
__attribute__((noinline)) void f(XX *x)
{
int c1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100514
Bug ID: 100514
Summary: [12 regression] Error in Ada build in bootstrap after
r12-648
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #1)
> The error is raised after ipa “inlining” pass, when doing ggc_collect at
> stage 2.
>
> At code:
> xlimit = ((*xlimit).next);
>
> The value of xlimit becomes 0xa5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100511
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100512
--- Comment #1 from Haoxin Tu ---
(In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #0)
> $gcc -w -O2
Sorry, it's an incomplete command here. It should be "gcc -w -O2 small.c".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #2 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
There is a similar bug fixed for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447. it may be a different
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #1 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
The error is raised after ipa “inlining” pass, when doing ggc_collect at stage
2.
At code:
xlimit = ((*xlimit).next);
The value of xlimit becomes 0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5 before crash. 0xa5 may comes
from poison_pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
Bug ID: 100513
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in lookup_page_table_entry)
for bootstrap-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
u/12.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/home/tuhaoxin/compilers/gcc/build/
--enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++
-disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 202
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100511
Bug ID: 100511
Summary: Fail to remove dead code in loop
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ab1176667734bd6de20833f8d263c03a418c452
commit r12-702-g6ab1176667734bd6de20833f8d263c03a418c452
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100138
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7a9f085ffd34b0d7bc4b803c182b41494f609aa
commit r12-701-ge7a9f085ffd34b0d7bc4b803c182b41494f609aa
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100506
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100506
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c54d25a7686406a11f44f58261a9e63821022b7
commit r12-699-g0c54d25a7686406a11f44f58261a9e63821022b7
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100477
--- Comment #7 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6)
> In C/C++ the size of the largest object is PTRDIFF_MAX - 1 bytes. This is
> necessary so that the difference between the address of its first byte and
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f665c1ca452673e9812cd92b07bd31441c0ac5b
commit r10-9814-g5f665c1ca452673e9812cd92b07bd31441c0ac5b
Author: Segher Bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100477
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
In C/C++ the size of the largest object is PTRDIFF_MAX - 1 bytes. This is
necessary so that the difference between the address of its first byte and that
just past its last byte fits in ptrdiff_t. A number
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100417
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jochen447 at concept dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 100496, which changed state.
Bug 100496 Summary: False positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100496
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100496
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100509
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #0)
> Not sure whether this is a dup of PR96131.
It is unrelated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100446
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
ofv at wanadoo dot es changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ofv at wanadoo dot es
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100444
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We could use a different function for AMD, rather than __x86_rdrand. If it
reads a -1 value it could try again a few more times, and if it gets -1 every
time assume it's broken (and throw?), maybe after b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100425
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100510
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100510
Bug 100510 depends on bug 100425, which changed state.
Bug 100425 Summary: missing -Walloca-larger-than with -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100425
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100425
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100425
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f974b54b8a0c330e9dd2b43ebc940100d601df0f
commit r12-690-gf974b54b8a0c330e9dd2b43ebc940100d601df0f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100510
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f974b54b8a0c330e9dd2b43ebc940100d601df0f
commit r12-690-gf974b54b8a0c330e9dd2b43ebc940100d601df0f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus ---
I am wondering whether it has something to do with shfl now requiring .sync,
especially for sm_70. (Non-sync version was deprecated in ISA 6.0 and for sm_70
removed in ISA 6.4.)
Cross ref: PR96005.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100510
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100510
Bug ID: 100510
Summary: bogus -Wvla-large-than with -Walloca
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210510 (experimental) [master revision
:fb3a8fb4a:25f9f35a85ffee808fc1482b14d91176df59751b] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
struct X {
int a;
};
const a = 0;
static struct X A __attribute__((alias("a")));
foo() { struct X b = A; }
$ gcc-trunk -O3 mutant.c
mu
algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210510 (experimental) [master revision
:fb3a8fb4a:25f9f35a85ffee808fc1482b14d91176df59751b] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
typedef __attribute__((__vector_size__(32))) V;
V j;
__attribute__((simd)) foo() { V m = j; }
$ gcc-trunk -g -O3 mutant.c
mutant.c:1:46: warning: typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100506
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||100417
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100507
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on invalid: tree check |[10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100477
--- Comment #5 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> The case of _size being very large and n very small may be handled correctly
> by the original code thanks to the check for _capacity but because its valu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100299
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100503
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> Does it pass with GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0 ?
This does not seem to help either way.
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4)
> Can anything be deduced from driver v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100507
Bug ID: 100507
Summary: ICE on invalid: tree check expects tree that contains
'decl common'
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100506
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100506
Bug ID: 100506
Summary: bootstrap error: No rule to make target
'gcc/version.c', needed by 'ada/stamp-sdefault'.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100477
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||88443
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Does it pass with GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> See below, fails with 4 systems, works with 3 others.
Can anything be deduced from driver versions?
Or card architecture?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
Doesn't fail for me unfortunately.
I've tried with GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0..-O4, no luck.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100485
--- Comment #7 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
Thanks for the outline! We'll turn off -Wmismatched-new-delete with GCC 11 and
try to switch to the selective opt-out with pragmas in 12. That's a good
workaround for now.
On a random related note,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100471
--- Comment #5 from Tom Vander Aa ---
This seems also to fix the original code, which I used to derive the test case.
(patch applied on master)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100485
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
That does sound frustrating, sorry. The #pragma has a limitation that can make
it difficult to use in inlining contexts. I submitted a patch for it for GCC
11 but it got pushed to GCC 12 (see pr98465 commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100505
--- Comment #2 from Chengnian Sun ---
Should I avoid reporting test programs with __GIMPLE or __RTL?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100503
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /tmp/tmp.FRQzt2wMfl-gcc-builder/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-checking-yes --enable-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210510
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210510 (experimental) [master revision
:fb3a8fb4a:25f9f35a85ffee808fc1482b14d91176df59751b] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
__attribute__((target_clones(0))) foo() {}
$ gcc-trunk mutant.c
mutant.c:1:35: warning: return type defaults to ‘int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100503
Bug ID: 100503
Summary: A possible divide by zero problem in function
do_rpo_vn
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100495
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Can you post a minimal version?
See below, fails with 4 systems, works with 3 others.
#define N 1024
int
main ()
{
_Complex float orfc = 0;
// _Complex int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100502
Bug ID: 100502
Summary: ICE in enforce_access at cp/semantics.c:368
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100487
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97792
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100413
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-10
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96915
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42587
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100393
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42587
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f94ed3b4c308c9da7baf59ecbc0f953e994f9c4
commit r12-664-g1f94ed3b4c308c9da7baf59ecbc0f953e994f9c4
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat May 8 07:2
-linux-gnu
Configured with: /tmp/tmp.FRQzt2wMfl-gcc-builder/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-checking-yes --enable-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210510
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100500
Bug ID: 100500
Summary: ICE with local label in OpenACC 'loop' region
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91193
Chengnian Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cnsun at uwaterloo dot ca
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64763
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100471
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50785
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50785&action=edit
gcc12-pr100471.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Tor from comment #6)
> Built with -j 256 on aarch64 Cavium Tx2 CN9980 nodes. Worked like a charm.
>
> Not sure why "dash" is ok, while "bash" is not!? Do you?
>
> I will set default shell to das
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100452
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cce4471bb45f72820eb6c15b4a75e67f704b209e
commit r12-662-gcce4471bb45f72820eb6c15b4a75e67f704b209e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100492
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60af2db18013a0339302928ba98fee893ccc1957
commit r12-661-g60af2db18013a0339302928ba98fee893ccc1957
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Can you post a minimal version?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100471
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
Bug ID: 100499
Summary: Different results with -fpeel-loops
-ftree-loop-vectorize options
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94695
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80542
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wolfgang.roe...@gi-de.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100498
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|11.0|11.1.0
Summary|[11/12 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44462
Bug 44462 depends on bug 100434, which changed state.
Bug 100434 Summary: DSE fails to DSE aggregate LHS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100434
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100434
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
