backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNE
preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying cond
c/cp/pt.c:14798
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
T
se include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warran
declarator
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:21485
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 20
c.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS
compiler error: Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
g++ (GCC) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99478
Bug ID: 99478
Summary: ICE when decltype lambda in template list
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aaron Sawdey :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9433c844c8bcf0166567943b45576ce0b131
commit r11-7570-g9433c844c8bcf0166567943b45576ce0b131
Author: Aaron Sawdey
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99477
Bug ID: 99477
Summary: CONTIGUOUS assumed-shape dummy not working with
associate construct
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99458
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99458
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5d3f15a0e04c30d5dbec09b56c14ad923a3e8da
commit r11-7569-gd5d3f15a0e04c30d5dbec09b56c14ad923a3e8da
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99458
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8e29c81b789db8a49616e0d36d16f869cf442a
commit r10-9424-g3c8e29c81b789db8a49616e0d36d16f869cf442a
Author: Ian Lance Tay
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99458
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a543ca52392b7aea135f47ac244485fcea0d267
commit r9-9275-g1a543ca52392b7aea135f47ac244485fcea0d267
Author: Ian Lance Taylo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99476
Bug ID: 99476
Summary: 'PATH_MAX' was not declared in this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99205
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This fixes the testcase and passes regtesting:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/data.c b/gcc/fortran/data.c
index 25e97930169..71e2552025d 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/data.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/data.c
@@ -595,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475
Bug ID: 99475
Summary: [10/11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an
array element of empty structs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99454
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99460
--- Comment #2 from mexon ---
For completeness, output from change a18ebd6c439:
vagrant@ubuntu-groovy:~$ g++ -v -save-temps -Wall --std=c++2a
builder_simplified.cpp
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/vagrant/install-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334
--- Comment #2 from AJ D ---
The problem seems to have been addressed in gcc-8.x, at least in this
particular function.
I could reproduce this issue in gcc-7.4, but not with gcc-8.2, as can be seen
below.
Will have to check if this issue is sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99474
Bug ID: 99474
Summary: missing warning on an out of bounds VLA access by a
pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99205
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99453
Philippe Blain changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||levraiphilippeblain at gmail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27)
> for Darwin x86
>
> * the test at line 83 fails, and with some more debugging stuff inserted and
> the abort removed, there are 66 cases where the strings do not ag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99433
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|custom friend |[11 Regressio
=+
| 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental) [master revision
0d9a70ea3881c284b7689b691d54d047b55b486d] (sparc-sun-solaris2.11) GCC error:|
| in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670 |
| Error detected around a-ztflau.adb:132:8
Reverting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe ---
for Darwin x86
* the test at line 83 fails, and with some more debugging stuff inserted and
the abort removed, there are 66 cases where the strings do not agree, so a bug
in libc (probably) .. I'm doing seem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd85b4dd2dd7b00b6342ed1e33fb48035a3dcb61
commit r11-7564-gbd85b4dd2dd7b00b6342ed1e33fb48035a3dcb61
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #16 from Khem Raj ---
the kernel build failures still happen. I am re-opened #99454 and #99455
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99434
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Testcase without includes:
> template
> constexpr _To
> bit_cast(const _From& __from) noexcept
> {
> return __builtin_bit_cast(_To, __from);
> }
>
> struct u64x2_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 98266, which changed state.
Bug 98266 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus array subscript is partly outside
array bounds on virtual inheritance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3daa6c0fd8d79ae45eac2dd0f274da1aa71c958
commit r11-7563-gf3daa6c0fd8d79ae45eac2dd0f274da1aa71c958
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97631
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|11.0|
Summary|[10/11 Regression] bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97631
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f5ff78ff3f971c11ec67f422b2fd34281db9123
commit r11-7562-g7f5ff78ff3f971c11ec67f422b2fd34281db9123
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b64551af5159ea30b5941ddd430001b13936822c
commit r11-7561-gb64551af5159ea30b5941ddd430001b13936822c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
ze g3, .-g3
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 11.0.1 20210308 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96268
--- Comment #4 from Will Wray ---
This now appears fixed on 11 trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99436
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99436
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc56d27de97ecea813279ce5ba45b278dcccfe21
commit r11-7560-gbc56d27de97ecea813279ce5ba45b278dcccfe21
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Further reduced:
DO iq = 1, nq
CALL calc_upper_fan (iq)
ENDDO
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE calc_upper_fan (iq)
INTEGER :: iq
INTEGER :: recl
INQUIRE(IOLENGTH=recl) iq
END
END
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
indeed, also enabling modules test in 2b mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #15 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99438 still happens,
i.e. i586-unknown-freebsd11.2.
Is anyone able to successfully build any 32-bit x86 target?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
--- Comment #26 from David Edelsohn ---
By default, long double on AIX is the same as double (64 bits). One optionally
can specify 128 bit long double and link with libc128.a to provide long double
stdio.
AIX float.h:
#define DECIMAL_DIG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99455
--- Comment #3 from Khem Raj ---
Created attachment 50333
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50333&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99455
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99469
--- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan ---
FWIW this is easy to reproduce with either csmith or yarpgen, so should be
straightforward to procure a new testcase if the above goes latent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99454
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov ---
*** Bug 99467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99467
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99467
Bug 99467 depends on bug 99461, which changed state.
Bug 99461 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at
recog.c:2670 since r11-7526-g9105757a59b89019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99461
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
*** Bug 99461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99461
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99437
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99468
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99468
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
504450c708c 2021-03-08 | c++: Poor diagnostic in header-unit [PR 99468]
Failed to deliver to '1918199...@qq.com'
SMTP module(domain qq.com) reports:
host mx3.qq.com says:
550 Mailbox unavailable or access denied
[MLhHVHLXRmXTTUI3rSVMccYp7fj8wY1a3idftwzU/qu+syDwCgBm3oaSBHI0sB6T7g== IP:
8.19.118.54]
Reporting-MTA: dns; stsh501.appriver.com
Original-Recipient: rfc82
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99470
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> The reason why int is not equivalent because signed integer overflow is
> undefined plus doing the math in 64bit or 32bit would cause a huge
> difference in some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb25dea3ef2c7768007bffc56f0e31e1c42b44e2
commit r11-7558-gcb25dea3ef2c7768007bffc56f0e31e1c42b44e2
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99470
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99418
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98834
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99472
Bug ID: 99472
Summary: [modules] std=c++2b flag appears incompatible with
C++20 module code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99285, which changed state.
Bug 99285 Summary: [modules] ICE canonical types differ for identical types
‘std::common_type...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99285
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99285
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99285
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ded6a1953dd7f43229c44e5d0d17c264338a3f4c
commit r11-7557-gded6a1953dd7f43229c44e5d0d17c264338a3f4c
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99470
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
these two code are not equivalent at all due to overflows and such.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #4)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > Confirmed, reduced test-case:
> >
> just curious, how did you reduce the testing case with -fprofile-use? (I
Sure. I used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
--- Comment #25 from Andreas Schwab ---
I don't think this is wrong, as long as DECIMAL_DIG <= 37.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
--- Comment #24 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #23)
> The AIX failure is:
>
> printf_buffer=
> 1.
> 4426950408889633870046509400708600880
> 000
>
> to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99471
Bug ID: 99471
Summary: Allow conversion from array of unknown bound to actual
known bound
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99420
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
The false positive is caused by the local redeclaration of f1() in h() below
not having had the type attributes added to it describing the form of the
array. This happens because instead of merging the type a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99467
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99465
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
Here is the minimal reduced example:
f() requires [
godbolt: https://godbolt.org/z/eMWxPj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99470
Bug ID: 99470
Summary: Convert fixed index addition to array address offset
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99434
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase without includes:
template
constexpr _To
bit_cast(const _From& __from) noexcept
{
return __builtin_bit_cast(_To, __from);
}
struct u64x2_t
{
#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
unsigned l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99434
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Test from PR99429:
namespace std {
struct strong_ordering {
int _v;
constexpr strong_ordering (int v) :_v(v) {}
constexpr operator int (void) const { return _v; }
static const strong_ordering less;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msharov at users dot
sourceforge.n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99429
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99469
Bug ID: 99469
Summary: ICE: qsort checking failed with selective scheduling
on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target|powerpc64*-linux-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99468
Bug ID: 99468
Summary: [modules] awkward diagnostic for named-module inside
header unit
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99462
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
(for context, the above patch was for PR 98856, but it's based on incorrect
latency analysis, see bug 98856 comment #38 )
Right now schedulers cannot easily split instructions for that purpose, it
would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
gcc11-pr99456.patch looks good, can we add a scan-not for the _ZGV guard
variables too? If the optimizer's turned on, I think __static_init... gets
inlined into the global constructor, might be good to mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99309
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |ipa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421
--- Comment #4 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Confirmed, reduced test-case:
>
just curious, how did you reduce the testing case with -fprofile-use? (I tried
Creduce, but failed)
another question, h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99467
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08
Ever confirmed|0
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
